Design Principles and Remaining Needs For U.S. Federal Climate Policy

Design Principles and Remaining Needs For U.S. Federal Climate Policy Reducing greenhouse gas emissions almost certainly requires adding a price to those activities that cause emissions. Policy makers have largely overlooked the most direct option, which is to set a price on emissions (an emission fee), and therefore may be missing an opportunity to reduce the risks of climate change. The advantages of emission fees are considerable, because they create a clear price signal to discourage emissions, help reveal who wins and loses from climate policy, are easy to administer, avoid nefarious market manipulation, and offer the potential for extremely strong emissions reductions in response to breakthrough opportunities. But emission fees also have notable disadvantages because they do not ensure limits on emissions, can be framed unfavorably in political debates, remain at an immature stage of policy development, and could be undermined by plausible political compromises. As a result, careful policy design is necessary to maximize the advantages of emission fees to society and to minimize their disadvantages. Critically, policy design can strive for favorable distributional effects, ensure a safe level of climate protection, and create the potential for even larger emission reductions if breakthroughs occur. Even then, additional climate policy needs will remain for both emission fee approaches, in particular, and climate change risk management more broadly. Most notably, a family of policies that includes mitigation, adaptation, and possibly geoengineering will be needed for comprehensive management strategies of climate change risks. Nevertheless, emission fees could provide one important component of this larger set of tools for dealing with the threat of climate change. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society

Design Principles and Remaining Needs For U.S. Federal Climate Policy

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/design-principles-and-remaining-needs-for-u-s-federal-climate-policy-dNfnEWkBUX
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0477
D.O.I.
10.1175/2009BAMS2885.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions almost certainly requires adding a price to those activities that cause emissions. Policy makers have largely overlooked the most direct option, which is to set a price on emissions (an emission fee), and therefore may be missing an opportunity to reduce the risks of climate change. The advantages of emission fees are considerable, because they create a clear price signal to discourage emissions, help reveal who wins and loses from climate policy, are easy to administer, avoid nefarious market manipulation, and offer the potential for extremely strong emissions reductions in response to breakthrough opportunities. But emission fees also have notable disadvantages because they do not ensure limits on emissions, can be framed unfavorably in political debates, remain at an immature stage of policy development, and could be undermined by plausible political compromises. As a result, careful policy design is necessary to maximize the advantages of emission fees to society and to minimize their disadvantages. Critically, policy design can strive for favorable distributional effects, ensure a safe level of climate protection, and create the potential for even larger emission reductions if breakthroughs occur. Even then, additional climate policy needs will remain for both emission fee approaches, in particular, and climate change risk management more broadly. Most notably, a family of policies that includes mitigation, adaptation, and possibly geoengineering will be needed for comprehensive management strategies of climate change risks. Nevertheless, emission fees could provide one important component of this larger set of tools for dealing with the threat of climate change.

Journal

Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: May 9, 2010

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off