CORRIGENDUM

CORRIGENDUM JANUARY 2018 C O R R I G E N D U M 221 DANIEL B. WHITT National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado JOHN R. TAYLOR Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Manuscript received 14 November 2017, in final form 21 November 2017) A bug in the numerical model used by Whitt and Taylor (2017) has been discovered, wherein the vertical molecular viscous momentum flux was set to zero at the top boundary during the calculation of the explicit part of the viscous stress in the Crank–Nicholson time- stepping scheme. The molecular viscosity is everywhere negligible compared to the subgrid-scale viscosity. However, as a result of this bug, the values of the surface stress t and mixed layer buoyancy flux ratio R plotted in Fig. 1 of Whitt and Taylor (2017) were ML incorrect. A corrected version of Fig. 1 is below, where t and R are reduced by a factor of ML 2in Fig. 1b, but Fig. 1a is the same as in Whitt and Taylor (2017). In addition, a new version of the strong buoyancy flux–forced front simulation was con- ducted with an air–sea buoyancy flux B (t) reduced http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Physical Oceanography American Meteorological Society

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/corrigendum-c07WGUK1nS
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0485
D.O.I.
10.1175/JPO-D-17-0242.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

JANUARY 2018 C O R R I G E N D U M 221 DANIEL B. WHITT National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado JOHN R. TAYLOR Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Manuscript received 14 November 2017, in final form 21 November 2017) A bug in the numerical model used by Whitt and Taylor (2017) has been discovered, wherein the vertical molecular viscous momentum flux was set to zero at the top boundary during the calculation of the explicit part of the viscous stress in the Crank–Nicholson time- stepping scheme. The molecular viscosity is everywhere negligible compared to the subgrid-scale viscosity. However, as a result of this bug, the values of the surface stress t and mixed layer buoyancy flux ratio R plotted in Fig. 1 of Whitt and Taylor (2017) were ML incorrect. A corrected version of Fig. 1 is below, where t and R are reduced by a factor of ML 2in Fig. 1b, but Fig. 1a is the same as in Whitt and Taylor (2017). In addition, a new version of the strong buoyancy flux–forced front simulation was con- ducted with an air–sea buoyancy flux B (t) reduced

Journal

Journal of Physical OceanographyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Jan 14, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial