Corrigendum

Corrigendum 1NOVEMBER 2017 C O R R I G E N D U M 8841 ROBERT C. WILLS AND TAPIO SCHNEIDER California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (Manuscript received and in final form 4 August 2017) Our published paper (Wills and Schneider 2015) contains errors in Fig. 9a. The drainage boundaries shown are incorrect in several places, most notably in the Nile River basin. These errors result from a bug in the code used to compute the drainage boundaries and are not inherent to the river topology dataset used (Fekete et al. 2001; Vörösmarty et al. 2000). This bug does not affect the computation of the river runoff fluxes. Therefore, the numerical values in Tables 3 and 4 of Wills and Schneider (2015) are correct as published. All con- clusions of Wills and Schneider (2015) are unaffected. We include here an updated Fig. 9. Acknowledgments. Thanks to Philip Craig for pointing out the incorrect drainage boundaries in our published manuscript. REFERENCES Dee, D., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, doi:10.1002/qj.828. Fekete, B. M., C. J. Vörösmarty, and R. B. Lammers, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/corrigendum-XrHUophSf0
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0442
D.O.I.
10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0524.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

1NOVEMBER 2017 C O R R I G E N D U M 8841 ROBERT C. WILLS AND TAPIO SCHNEIDER California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (Manuscript received and in final form 4 August 2017) Our published paper (Wills and Schneider 2015) contains errors in Fig. 9a. The drainage boundaries shown are incorrect in several places, most notably in the Nile River basin. These errors result from a bug in the code used to compute the drainage boundaries and are not inherent to the river topology dataset used (Fekete et al. 2001; Vörösmarty et al. 2000). This bug does not affect the computation of the river runoff fluxes. Therefore, the numerical values in Tables 3 and 4 of Wills and Schneider (2015) are correct as published. All con- clusions of Wills and Schneider (2015) are unaffected. We include here an updated Fig. 9. Acknowledgments. Thanks to Philip Craig for pointing out the incorrect drainage boundaries in our published manuscript. REFERENCES Dee, D., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, doi:10.1002/qj.828. Fekete, B. M., C. J. Vörösmarty, and R. B. Lammers,

Journal

Journal of ClimateAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Nov 4, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial