Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
a., Phillips, G., Danabasoglu, P., KushnEr, K., linDsay, E., Munoz, l., Polvani (2015)
The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variabilityBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96
J. Stroeve, V. Kattsov, A. Barrett, M. Serreze, Tatiana Pavlova, M. Holland, W. Meier (2012)
Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observationsGeophysical Research Letters, 39
R. Lindsay, M. Wensnahan, A. Schweiger, Jinlun Zhang (2014)
Evaluation of Seven Different Atmospheric Reanalysis Products in the ArcticJournal of Climate, 27
(2013)
NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of PassiveMicrowave Sea Ice Concentration, version 2. National Snow and Ice Data
E. Hawkins, R. Sutton (2011)
The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation changeClimate Dynamics, 37
E. Hawkins, R. Sutton (2009)
The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate PredictionsBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90
D. Thompson, E. Barnes, C. Deser, W. Foust, A. Phillips (2015)
Quantifying the Role of Internal Climate Variability in Future Climate TrendsJournal of Climate, 28
S. Laxon, K. Giles, A. Ridout, D. Wingham, R. Willatt, R. Cullen, R. Kwok, A. Schweiger, Jinlun Zhang, C. Haas, S. Hendricks, R. Krishfield, N. Kurtz, S. Farrell, M. Davidson (2013)
CryoSat‐2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volumeGeophysical Research Letters, 40
J. Marotzke, P. Forster (2015)
Forcing, feedback and internal variability in global temperature trendsNature, 517
G. Meehl, R. Moss, K. Taylor, V. Eyring, R. Stouffer, S. Bony, B. Stevens (2014)
Climate model intercomparisons: Preparing for the next phaseEos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 95
J. Gregory, P. Stott, D. Cresswell, N. Rayner, C. Gordon, D. Sexton (2002)
Recent and future changes in Arctic sea ice simulated by the HadCM3 AOGCMGeophysical Research Letters, 29
J. Screen (2014)
Arctic amplification decreases temperature variance in northern mid- to high-latitudesNature Climate Change, 4
P. Gleckler, K. Taylor, C. Doutriaux (2008)
Performance metrics for climate modelsJournal of Geophysical Research, 113
H. Goosse, O. Arzel, C. Bitz, A. Montety, M. Vancoppenolle (2009)
Increased variability of the Arctic summer ice extent in a warmer climateGeophysical Research Letters, 36
E. Rosenblum, I. Eisenman (2016)
Faster Arctic Sea Ice Retreat in CMIP5 than in CMIP3 due to VolcanoesJournal of Climate, 29
D. Notz (2015)
How well must climate models agree with observations?Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 373
K. Trenberth (2011)
Attribution of climate variations and trends to human influences and natural variabilityWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2
(2012)
Rahmstorf, 2012: A decade of weather
A. Schindler, A. Toreti, M. Zampieri, E. Scoccimarro, S. Gualdi, S. Fukutome, E. Xoplaki, J. Luterbacher (2015)
On the Internal Variability of Simulated Daily PrecipitationJournal of Climate, 28
D. Rapp (2014)
Long-term climate change
V. Zunz, H. Goosse, F. Massonnet (2012)
How does internal variability influence the ability of CMIP5 models to reproduce the recent trend in Southern Ocean sea ice extentThe Cryosphere, 7
L. Resplandy, R. Séférian, L. Bopp (2015)
Natural variability of CO2 and O2 fluxes: What can we learn from centuries‐long climate models simulations?Journal of Geophysical Research, 120
M. Holland, C. Bitz, L. Tremblay, D. Bailey (2013)
The Role of Natural Versus Forced Change in Future Rapid Summer Arctic Ice LossGeophysical monograph, 180
C. Roberts, M. Palmer, D. McNeall, M. Collins (2015)
Quantifying the likelihood of a continued hiatus in global warmingNature Climate Change, 5
C. Holmes, T. Woollings, E. Hawkins, H. Vries (2016)
Robust Future Changes in Temperature Variability under Greenhouse Gas Forcing and the Relationship with Thermal AdvectionJournal of Climate, 29
F. Haumann, D. Notz, H. Schmidt (2014)
Anthropogenic influence on recent circulation‐driven Antarctic sea ice changesGeophysical Research Letters, 41
N. Swart, J. Fyfe, E. Hawkins, J. Kay, A. Jahn (2015)
Influence of internal variability on Arctic sea-ice trendsNature Climate Change, 5
T. Schneider, T. Bischoff, H. Płotka (2015)
Physics of Changes in Synoptic Midlatitude Temperature VariabilityJournal of Climate, 28
Jianhua Lu, A. Hu, Z. Zeng (2014)
On the possible interaction between internal climate variability and forced climate changeGeophysical Research Letters, 41
B. Santer, C. Bonfils, J. Painter, M. Zelinka, C. Mears, S. Solomon, G. Schmidt, J. Fyfe, J. Cole, L. Nazarenko, K. Taylor, F. Wentz (2014)
Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperatureNature Geoscience, 7
R. Moss, J. Edmonds, K. Hibbard, M. Manning, S. Rose, D. Vuuren, T. Carter, S. Emori, M. Kainuma, T. Kram, G. Meehl, J. Mitchell, N. Nakicenovic, K. Riahi, Steven Smith, R. Stouffer, A. Thomson, J. Weyant, T. Wilbanks (2010)
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessmentNature, 463
I. Esau, Richard Davy, S. Outten (2012)
Complementary explanation of temperature response in the lower atmosphereEnvironmental Research Letters, 7
D. Coumou, S. Rahmstorf (2012)
A decade of weather extremesNature Climate Change, 2
S. Bathiany, Bregje Bolt, M. Williamson, T. Lenton, M. Scheffer, E. Nes, D. Notz (2016)
Statistical indicators of Arctic sea-ice stability - prospects and limitationsThe Cryosphere, 10
G. Flato, J. Marotzke, B. Abiodun, P. Braconnot, S. Chou, W. Collins, P. Cox, F. Driouech, S. Emori, V. Eyring, C. Forest, P. Gleckler, E. Guilyardi, C. Jakob, V. Kattsov, C. Reason, M. Rummukainen (2013)
Evaluation of climate models
K. Taylor, R. Stouffer, G. Meehl (2012)
An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment designBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93
F. Massonnet, T. Fichefet, H. Goosse, P. Hezel, C. Bitz, G. Philippon, M. Holland, P. Barriat (2012)
Constraining projections of summer Arctic sea iceThe EGU General Assembly, 15
C. Deser, A. Phillips, Vincent Bourdette, H. Teng (2012)
Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variabilityClimate Dynamics, 38
H. Titchner, N. Rayner (2014)
The Met Office Hadley Centre sea ice and sea surface temperature data set, version 2: 1. Sea ice concentrationsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119
(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/joc.1756
A. Schweiger, R. Lindsay, Jinlun Zhang, M. Steele, H. Stern, R. Kwok (2011)
Uncertainty in modeled Arctic sea ice volumeJournal of Geophysical Research, 116
C. Deser, A. Phillips, M. Alexander, B. Smoliak (2014)
Projecting North American Climate over the Next 50 Years: Uncertainty due to Internal Variability*Journal of Climate, 27
E. Hawkins, Robin Smith, J. Gregory, D. Stainforth (2016)
Irreducible uncertainty in near-term climate projectionsClimate Dynamics, 46
K. Swanson, G. Sugihara, A. Tsonis (2009)
Long-term natural variability and 20th century climate changeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106
J. Wettstein, C. Deser (2014)
Internal Variability in Projections of Twenty-First-Century Arctic Sea Ice Loss: Role of the Large-Scale Atmospheric CirculationJournal of Climate, 27
J. Neumann (1932)
Proof of the Quasi-Ergodic Hypothesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 18 1
B. Hingray, M. Saïd (2014)
Partitioning Internal Variability and Model Uncertainty Components in a Multimember Multimodel Ensemble of Climate ProjectionsJournal of Climate, 27
I. Eisenman, T. Schneider, D. Battisti, C. Bitz (2011)
Consistent Changes in the Sea Ice Seasonal Cycle in Response to Global WarmingJournal of Climate, 24
J. Stroeve, A. Barrett, M. Serreze, A. Schweiger (2014)
Using records from submarine, aircraft and satellites to evaluate climate model simulations of Arctic sea ice thicknessThe Cryosphere, 8
C. Huntingford, P. Jones, V. Livina, T. Lenton, P. Cox (2013)
No increase in global temperature variability despite changing regional patternsNature, 500
C. Bitz, G. Roe (2004)
A Mechanism for the High Rate of Sea Ice Thinning in the Arctic OceanJournal of Climate, 17
K. Briffa, P. Jones, F. Schweingruber, T. Osborn (1998)
Influence of volcanic eruptions on Northern Hemisphere summer temperature over the past 600 yearsNature, 393
R. Bradley, P. Jones (1992)
Records of explosive volcanic eruptions over the last 500 years
E. Schneider, J. Kinter (1994)
An examination of internally generated variability in long climate simulationsClimate Dynamics, 10
Irina Mahlstein, R. Knutti (2011)
September Arctic sea ice predicted to disappear near 2°C global warming above presentJournal of Geophysical Research, 117
Irina Mahlstein, P. Gent, S. Solomon (2013)
Historical Antarctic mean sea ice area, sea ice trends, and winds in CMIP5 simulationsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118
D. Notz (2014)
Sea-ice extent and its trend provide limited metrics of model performanceThe Cryosphere, 8
M. Huber, R. Knutti (2014)
Natural variability, radiative forcing and climate response in the recent hiatus reconciledNature Geoscience, 7
Einar Ólason, D. Notz (2014)
Drivers of variability in Arctic sea-ice drift speedJournal of Geophysical Research, 119
Jinlun Zhang, D. Rothrock (2003)
Modeling Global Sea Ice with a Thickness and Enthalpy Distribution Model in Generalized Curvilinear CoordinatesMonthly Weather Review, 131
C. Deser, J. Walsh, M. Timlin (2000)
Arctic Sea Ice Variability in the Context of Recent Atmospheric Circulation TrendsJournal of Climate, 13
L. Frankcombe, M. England, M. Mann, B. Steinman (2015)
Separating Internal Variability from the Externally Forced Climate ResponseJournal of Climate, 28
Qi Shu, Zhenya Song, F. Qiao (2014)
Assessment of sea ice simulations in the CMIP5 modelsThe Cryosphere, 9
T. Knutson, F. Zeng, A. Wittenberg (2013)
Multimodel Assessment of Regional Surface Temperature Trends: CMIP3 and CMIP5 Twentieth-Century SimulationsJournal of Climate, 26
M. Palmer, D. McNeall (2014)
Internal variability of Earth’s energy budget simulated by CMIP5 climate modelsEnvironmental Research Letters, 9
D. Notz (2009)
The future of ice sheets and sea ice: Between reversible retreat and unstoppable lossProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106
R. Sutton, E. Suckling, E. Hawkins (2015)
What does global mean temperature tell us about local climate?Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 373
M. Collins, R. Knutti, J. Arblaster, J. Dufresne, T. Fichefet, P. Friedlingstein, Xuejie Gao, Bill Gutowski, T. Johns, G. Krinner, M. Shongwe, C. Tebaldi, A. Weaver, M. Wehner (2013)
Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility
R. Kwok, D. Rothrock (2009)
Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958–2008Geophysical Research Letters, 36
AbstractThis paper introduces and applies a new method to consistently estimate internal climate variability for all models within a multimodel ensemble. The method regresses each model’s estimate of internal variability from the preindustrial control simulation on the variability derived from a model’s ensemble simulations, thus providing practical evidence of the quasi-ergodic assumption. The method allows one to test in a multimodel consensus view how the internal variability of a variable changes for different forcing scenarios. Applying the method to the CMIP5 model ensemble shows that the internal variability of global-mean surface air temperature remains largely unchanged for historical simulations and might decrease for future simulations with a large CO2 forcing. Regionally, the projected changes reveal likely increases in temperature variability in the tropics, subtropics, and polar regions, and extremely likely decreases in midlatitudes. Applying the method to sea ice volume and area shows that their respective internal variability likely or extremely likely decreases proportionally to their mean state, except for Arctic sea ice area, which shows no consistent change across models. For the evaluation of CMIP5 simulations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice, the method confirms that internal variability can explain most of the models’ deviation from observed trends but often not the models’ deviation from the observed mean states. The new method benefits from a large number of models and long preindustrial control simulations, but it requires only a small number of ensemble simulations. The method allows for consistent consideration of internal variability in multimodel studies and thus fosters understanding of the role of internal variability in a changing climate.
Journal of Climate – American Meteorological Society
Published: Dec 2, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.