Comparison of Tropospheric Temperatures from Radiosondes and Satellites: 197998

Comparison of Tropospheric Temperatures from Radiosondes and Satellites: 197998 A comprehensive comparison is made between two tropospheric temperature datasets over the period 197998: the most recent and substantially revised (version d) microwave sounding unit (MSU) channel 2 data retrievals, and a gridded radiosonde analysis provided by the Hadley Centre of the U.K. Meteorological Office. The latter is vertically weighted to approximate the deep layer temperatures measured by the satellite data. At individual grid points, there is good overall agreement among monthly anomalies, especially over the Northern Hemisphere continents where the climate signal is large, although monthly root-mean-square (rms) differences typically exceed 0.6C. Over the Tropics, correlations are lower and rms differences can be as large as the standard deviations of monthly anomalies. Differences in the gridpoint variances are significant at many locations, which presumably reflects sources of noise in one or both measurement systems.It is often argued for climate purposes that temperature anomalies are large in scale so that averaging over larger areas better serves to define the anomalies while reducing sampling error. This is the case for the Tropics (20S20N) where the large signal associated with El Nio-Southern Oscillation events is well captured in both datasets. Over the extratropics, however, the results indicate that it is essential to subsample the satellite data with the radiosonde coverage in both space and time in any evaluation. For collocated global average monthly anomalies, correlations are ~0.9 with rms differences ~0.10C for both lower- (MSU2LT) and mid- (MSU2) tropospheric anomalies.The agreement between the satellite and radiosonde data is slightly better for the latest version of MSU2LT than it is for MSU2, in spite of the higher noise levels of the former. This is primarily attributable to a strong warming trend in the MSU2, data relative to the radiosonde data toward the end of the record. Given the global nature of this discrepancy, it is suspected that it primarily reflects problems in the MSU analysis. As radiosonde records almost universally contain temporal inhomogeneities as well, caution is required when interpreting trends, which are not known to within 0.1 C decade1. However, the evidence suggests that global surface air temperatures are indeed warming at a significantly faster rate than tropospheric temperatures over the past 20 yr, and this is primarily attributable to physical differences in these two quantities. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society

Comparison of Tropospheric Temperatures from Radiosondes and Satellites: 197998

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/comparison-of-tropospheric-temperatures-from-radiosondes-and-jWW9HtPNo2
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0477
D.O.I.
10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2165:COTTFR>2.3.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A comprehensive comparison is made between two tropospheric temperature datasets over the period 197998: the most recent and substantially revised (version d) microwave sounding unit (MSU) channel 2 data retrievals, and a gridded radiosonde analysis provided by the Hadley Centre of the U.K. Meteorological Office. The latter is vertically weighted to approximate the deep layer temperatures measured by the satellite data. At individual grid points, there is good overall agreement among monthly anomalies, especially over the Northern Hemisphere continents where the climate signal is large, although monthly root-mean-square (rms) differences typically exceed 0.6C. Over the Tropics, correlations are lower and rms differences can be as large as the standard deviations of monthly anomalies. Differences in the gridpoint variances are significant at many locations, which presumably reflects sources of noise in one or both measurement systems.It is often argued for climate purposes that temperature anomalies are large in scale so that averaging over larger areas better serves to define the anomalies while reducing sampling error. This is the case for the Tropics (20S20N) where the large signal associated with El Nio-Southern Oscillation events is well captured in both datasets. Over the extratropics, however, the results indicate that it is essential to subsample the satellite data with the radiosonde coverage in both space and time in any evaluation. For collocated global average monthly anomalies, correlations are ~0.9 with rms differences ~0.10C for both lower- (MSU2LT) and mid- (MSU2) tropospheric anomalies.The agreement between the satellite and radiosonde data is slightly better for the latest version of MSU2LT than it is for MSU2, in spite of the higher noise levels of the former. This is primarily attributable to a strong warming trend in the MSU2, data relative to the radiosonde data toward the end of the record. Given the global nature of this discrepancy, it is suspected that it primarily reflects problems in the MSU analysis. As radiosonde records almost universally contain temporal inhomogeneities as well, caution is required when interpreting trends, which are not known to within 0.1 C decade1. However, the evidence suggests that global surface air temperatures are indeed warming at a significantly faster rate than tropospheric temperatures over the past 20 yr, and this is primarily attributable to physical differences in these two quantities.

Journal

Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Sep 21, 2000

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial