An assessment of high-resolution gridded temperature datasets over California

An assessment of high-resolution gridded temperature datasets over California AbstractHigh-resolution gridded datasets are in high demand because they are spatially complete and include important fine-scale details. Previous assessments have been limited to 2-3 gridded datasets or analyzed the datasets only at the station locations. Here, eight high-resolution gridded temperature datasets are assessed two ways: at the stations, by comparing with Global Historical Climatology Network – Daily data; and away from stations, using physical principles. This assessment includes six station-based datasets, one interpolated reanalysis, and one dynamically downscaled reanalysis. California is used as a test domain because of its complex terrain and coastlines, features known to differentiate gridded datasets. As expected, climatologies of station-based datasets agree closely with station data. However, away from stations, spread in climatologies can exceed 6 °C. Some station-based datasets are very likely biased near the coast and in complex terrain, due to inaccurate lapse rates. Many station-based datasets have large unphysical trends (> 1 °C decade−1) due to unhomogenized or missing station data—an issue that has been fixed in some datasets by using existing homogenization algorithms. Meanwhile, reanalysis-based gridded datasets have systematic biases relative to station data. Dynamically downscaled reanalysis is less biased than interpolated reanalysis, and has more realistic variability and trends. Dynamical downscaling also captures snow-albedo feedback, which station-based datasets miss. Overall, these results indicate that (1) gridded dataset choice can be a substantial source of uncertainty, and (2) some datasets are better suited for certain applications. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society

An assessment of high-resolution gridded temperature datasets over California

Journal of Climate , Volume preprint (2018): 1 – Feb 19, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/an-assessment-of-high-resolution-gridded-temperature-datasets-over-ZkQGEfB10S
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0442
D.O.I.
10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0410.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractHigh-resolution gridded datasets are in high demand because they are spatially complete and include important fine-scale details. Previous assessments have been limited to 2-3 gridded datasets or analyzed the datasets only at the station locations. Here, eight high-resolution gridded temperature datasets are assessed two ways: at the stations, by comparing with Global Historical Climatology Network – Daily data; and away from stations, using physical principles. This assessment includes six station-based datasets, one interpolated reanalysis, and one dynamically downscaled reanalysis. California is used as a test domain because of its complex terrain and coastlines, features known to differentiate gridded datasets. As expected, climatologies of station-based datasets agree closely with station data. However, away from stations, spread in climatologies can exceed 6 °C. Some station-based datasets are very likely biased near the coast and in complex terrain, due to inaccurate lapse rates. Many station-based datasets have large unphysical trends (> 1 °C decade−1) due to unhomogenized or missing station data—an issue that has been fixed in some datasets by using existing homogenization algorithms. Meanwhile, reanalysis-based gridded datasets have systematic biases relative to station data. Dynamically downscaled reanalysis is less biased than interpolated reanalysis, and has more realistic variability and trends. Dynamical downscaling also captures snow-albedo feedback, which station-based datasets miss. Overall, these results indicate that (1) gridded dataset choice can be a substantial source of uncertainty, and (2) some datasets are better suited for certain applications.

Journal

Journal of ClimateAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Feb 19, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial