Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Briggs (2007)
Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric SciencesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 102
Adam Scaife, Carlo Buontempo, Mark Ringer, Mike Sanderson, Chris Gordon, John Mitchell (2009)
I Toward Seamless Prediction: Calibration of Climate Change Projections Using Seasonal Forecasts
F. Lott, P. Stott (2016)
Evaluating Simulated Fraction of Attributable Risk Using Climate ObservationsJournal of Climate, 29
P. Stott, N. Christidis, F. Otto, Ying Sun, J. Vanderlinden, G. Oldenborgh, R. Vautard, H. Storch, P. Walton, P. Yiou, F. Zwiers (2015)
Attribution of extreme weather and climate‐related eventsWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Climate Change, 7
A. Weisheimer, N. Schaller, C. O’Reilly, D. MacLeod, T. Palmer (2017)
Atmospheric seasonal forecasts of the twentieth century: multi‐decadal variability in predictive skill of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and their potential value for extreme event attributionQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Royal Meteorological Society (Great Britain), 143
P. Webster, V. Magaña, T. Palmer, J. Shukla, R. Tomas, M. Yanai, T. Yasunari (1998)
Monsoons: Processes, predictability, and the prospects for predictionJournal of Geophysical Research, 103
R. Buizza, T. Palmer (1995)
The Singular-Vector Structure of the Atmospheric Global CirculationJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 52
(2008)
Reliability of climate change projections of precipitation : Towards “ seamless ” climate predictions
J. Wettstein, C. Deser (2014)
Internal Variability in Projections of Twenty-First-Century Arctic Sea Ice Loss: Role of the Large-Scale Atmospheric CirculationJournal of Climate, 27
O. Bellprat, F. Doblas-Reyes (2016)
Attribution of extreme weather and climate events overestimated by unreliable climate simulationsGeophysical Research Letters, 43
E. Barnes, J. Screen (2015)
The impact of Arctic warming on the midlatitude jet‐stream: Can it? Has it? Will it?Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6
A. Turner, H. Annamalai (2012)
Climate change and the South Asian summer monsoonNature Climate Change, 2
Francis (2015)
Evidence linking rapid Arctic warming to mid-latitude weather patternsPhilos. Trans. Roy. Soc., A373
M. Matsueda, R. Mizuta, S. Kusunoki (2009)
Future change in wintertime atmospheric blocking simulated using a 20‐km‐mesh atmospheric global circulation modelJournal of Geophysical Research, 114
(2008)
Reliability of climate change projections of precipitation
(1995)
Towards a unified approach to climate and weather prediction
J. Anstey, P. Davini, L. Gray, T. Woollings, N. Butchart, C. Cagnazzo, B. Christiansen, S. Hardiman, S. Osprey, Shuting Yang (2013)
Multi‐model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolutionJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118
R. Schiemann, M. Demory, L. Shaffrey, J. Strachan, P. Vidale, M. Mizielinski, M. Roberts, M. Matsueda, M. Wehner, T. Jung (2017)
The resolution sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere blocking in four 25-km atmospheric global circulation models.Journal of Climate, 30
M. Matsueda, A. Weisheimer, T. Palmer (2016)
Calibrating Climate Change Time-Slice Projections with Estimates of Seasonal Forecast ReliabilityJournal of Climate, 29
A. Weisheimer, T. Palmer (2013)
On the reliability of seasonal climate forecastsJournal of the Royal Society Interface, 11
K. Ramesh, P. Goswami (2014)
Assessing reliability of regional climate projections: the case of Indian monsoonScientific Reports, 4
G. Masato, B. Hoskins, T. Woollings (2013)
Winter and Summer Northern Hemisphere Blocking in CMIP5 ModelsJournal of Climate, 26
B. Legras, M. Ghil (1985)
Persistent Anomalies, Blocking and Variations in Atmospheric PredictabilityJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 42
T. Palmer (1999)
A Nonlinear Dynamical Perspective on Climate PredictionJournal of Climate, 12
J. Francis, N. Skific (2015)
Evidence linking rapid Arctic warming to mid-latitude weather patternsPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 373
AbstractAlthough the development of seamless prediction systems is becoming increasingly common, there is still confusion regarding the relevance of information from initial-value forecasts for assessing the trustworthiness of the climate system’s response to forcing. A simple system that mimics the real climate system through its regime structure is used to illustrate this potential relevance. The more complex version of this model defines “reality” and a simplified version of the system represents the “model.” The model’s response to forcing is profoundly incorrect. However, the untrustworthiness of the model’s response to forcing can be deduced from the model’s initial-value unreliability. The nonlinearity of the system is crucial in accounting for this result.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society – American Meteorological Society
Published: Mar 3, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.