Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Review of Procedures for Updating Air Quality Modeling Techniques for Regulatory Programs

A Review of Procedures for Updating Air Quality Modeling Techniques for Regulatory Programs AbstractAir quality models are a key component in determining pollution control requirements. To ensure that the best techniques are used, modeling guidance must be flexible and include better techniques as they become available. Revisions to modeling guidance require an assessment of the scientific basis, a model performance evaluation using observed data, sensitivity analysis for impact on design concentrations and data input requirements, and public review and comment before formal adoption in regulatory programs. The procedures used in reviewing new techniques are examined in this paper, and past actions are discussed. The appropriateness of adopting a new method for modeling area sources characterized by low-level releases with little buoyancy is provided as an example of the revision review process. While this process is lengthy, it ensures that decisions on potentially costly pollution controls are based on full public participation and sound scientific developments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Review of Procedures for Updating Air Quality Modeling Techniques for Regulatory Programs

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/a-review-of-procedures-for-updating-air-quality-modeling-techniques-a2YU0kn1Zl

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
0894-8763
DOI
10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<0731:AROPFU>2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractAir quality models are a key component in determining pollution control requirements. To ensure that the best techniques are used, modeling guidance must be flexible and include better techniques as they become available. Revisions to modeling guidance require an assessment of the scientific basis, a model performance evaluation using observed data, sensitivity analysis for impact on design concentrations and data input requirements, and public review and comment before formal adoption in regulatory programs. The procedures used in reviewing new techniques are examined in this paper, and past actions are discussed. The appropriateness of adopting a new method for modeling area sources characterized by low-level releases with little buoyancy is provided as an example of the revision review process. While this process is lengthy, it ensures that decisions on potentially costly pollution controls are based on full public participation and sound scientific developments.

There are no references for this article.