A Comparison of ERBE and AVHRR Longwave Flux Estimates

A Comparison of ERBE and AVHRR Longwave Flux Estimates Comparisons have been made between estimates of the outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) at the top of the atmosphere derived from narrowband Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) and broadband Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) scanning instruments. Four months of measurements are considered: April, July, and October 1985 and January 1986. Instantaneous comparisons (i.e., collocated in space and time) are considered.In the former, regional, zonal, and global analyses are performed using collocated and coincident OLR estimates on a 2.5 latitude-longitude scale. In general, the two datasets are found to be in reasonably good agreement, with the mean state and fundamental variability in time and space captured by the two sets of measurements. However, systematic biases are observed between the two datasets, particularly over the subtropical oceans, the daytime deserts, and over snow-covered surfaces at the high latitudes. The monthly global bias between the two datasets (ERBE minus AVHRR) is between 1 and 2 Wm2 during daytime, and between 4 and 7 Wm2 during nighttime, while the rms differences range between 12 (June) and 15 (January) Wm2.Radiative transfer simulations show that these systematic errors may be attributed to limitations in the single-channel narrowband to broadband algorithm. Even though the results may be globally unbiased, regional biases result where particularly persistent conditions (e.g., trade wind inversion, subsidence over deserts) prevail. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society American Meteorological Society

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ams/a-comparison-of-erbe-and-avhrr-longwave-flux-estimates-R0twdsi8Y3
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0477
D.O.I.
10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<2115:ACOEAA>2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Comparisons have been made between estimates of the outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) at the top of the atmosphere derived from narrowband Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) and broadband Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) scanning instruments. Four months of measurements are considered: April, July, and October 1985 and January 1986. Instantaneous comparisons (i.e., collocated in space and time) are considered.In the former, regional, zonal, and global analyses are performed using collocated and coincident OLR estimates on a 2.5 latitude-longitude scale. In general, the two datasets are found to be in reasonably good agreement, with the mean state and fundamental variability in time and space captured by the two sets of measurements. However, systematic biases are observed between the two datasets, particularly over the subtropical oceans, the daytime deserts, and over snow-covered surfaces at the high latitudes. The monthly global bias between the two datasets (ERBE minus AVHRR) is between 1 and 2 Wm2 during daytime, and between 4 and 7 Wm2 during nighttime, while the rms differences range between 12 (June) and 15 (January) Wm2.Radiative transfer simulations show that these systematic errors may be attributed to limitations in the single-channel narrowband to broadband algorithm. Even though the results may be globally unbiased, regional biases result where particularly persistent conditions (e.g., trade wind inversion, subsidence over deserts) prevail.

Journal

Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Nov 14, 1994

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off