AbstractVerification of localized events such as precipitation has become even more challenging with the advent of high-resolution mesoscale numerical weather prediction (NWP). The realism of a forecast suggests that it should compare well against precipitation radar imagery with similar resolution, both spatially and temporally. Spatial verification methods solve some of the representativity issues that point verification gives rise to. In this paper, a verification strategy based on model output statistics (MOS) is applied that aims to address both double-penalty and resolution effects that are inherent to comparisons of NWP models with different resolutions. Using predictors based on spatial precipitation patterns around a set of stations, an extended logistic regression (ELR) equation is deduced, leading to a probability forecast distribution of precipitation for each NWP model, analysis, and lead time. The ELR equations are derived for predictands based on areal-calibrated radar precipitation and SYNOP observations. The aim is to extract maximum information from a series of precipitation forecasts, like a trained forecaster would. The method is applied to the nonhydrostatic model Harmonie-AROME (2.5-km resolution), HIRLAM (11-km resolution), and the ECMWF model (16-km resolution), overall yielding similar Brier skill scores for the three postprocessed models, but somewhat larger differences for individual lead times. In addition, the fractions skill score is computed using the three deterministic forecasts, showing slightly higher skill for the Harmonie-AROME model. In other words, despite the realism of Harmonie-AROME precipitation forecasts, they only perform similarly or somewhat better than precipitation forecasts from the two lower-resolution models, at least in the Netherlands.
Monthly Weather Review – American Meteorological Society
Published: Oct 6, 2017
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera