Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Substrate Specificity of the Citrate Transporter CitP of Lactococcus lactis

Substrate Specificity of the Citrate Transporter CitP of Lactococcus lactis Substrate Specificity of the Citrate Transporter CitP of Lactococcus lactis Agata M. Pudlik a , b , c and Juke S. Lolkema b a Top Institute Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands b Molecular Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands c The Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentations/NCSB, Delft, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The citrate transporter CitP of lactic acid bacteria catalyzes electrogenic precursor-product exchange of citrate versus l -lactate during citrate-glucose cometabolism. In the absence of sugar, l -lactate is replaced by the metabolic intermediates/end products pyruvate, α-acetolactate, and acetate. In this study, the binding and translocation properties of CitP were analyzed systematically for a wide variety of mono- and dicarboxylates of the form X-CR 2 -COO − , where X represents OH (2-hydroxy acid), O (2-keto acid), or H (acid) and R groups differ in size, hydrophobicity, and composition. It follows that CitP is a very promiscuous carboxylate transporter. A carboxylate group is both essential and sufficient for recognition by the transporter. A C-2 atom is not essential, formate is a substrate, and C-2 may be part of a ring structure, as in benzoate. The R group may be as bulky as an indole ring structure. For all monocarboxylates of the form X-CHR-COO − , the hydroxy (X = OH) analogs were the preferred substrates. The preference for keto (X = O) or acid (X = H) analogs was dependent on the bulkiness of the R group, such that the acid was preferred for small R groups and the 2-ketoacid was preferred for more bulky R groups. The C 4 to C 6 dicarboxylates succinate, glutarate, and adipate were also substrates of CitP. The broad substrate specificity is discussed in the context of a model of the binding site of CitP. Many of the substrates of CitP are intermediates or products of amino acid metabolism, suggesting that CitP may have a broader physiological function than its role in citrate fermentation alone. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Bacteriology American Society For Microbiology

Substrate Specificity of the Citrate Transporter CitP of Lactococcus lactis

Journal of Bacteriology , Volume 194 (14): 3627 – Jul 15, 2012

Substrate Specificity of the Citrate Transporter CitP of Lactococcus lactis

Journal of Bacteriology , Volume 194 (14): 3627 – Jul 15, 2012

Abstract

Substrate Specificity of the Citrate Transporter CitP of Lactococcus lactis Agata M. Pudlik a , b , c and Juke S. Lolkema b a Top Institute Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands b Molecular Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands c The Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentations/NCSB, Delft, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The citrate transporter CitP of lactic acid bacteria catalyzes electrogenic precursor-product exchange of citrate versus l -lactate during citrate-glucose cometabolism. In the absence of sugar, l -lactate is replaced by the metabolic intermediates/end products pyruvate, α-acetolactate, and acetate. In this study, the binding and translocation properties of CitP were analyzed systematically for a wide variety of mono- and dicarboxylates of the form X-CR 2 -COO − , where X represents OH (2-hydroxy acid), O (2-keto acid), or H (acid) and R groups differ in size, hydrophobicity, and composition. It follows that CitP is a very promiscuous carboxylate transporter. A carboxylate group is both essential and sufficient for recognition by the transporter. A C-2 atom is not essential, formate is a substrate, and C-2 may be part of a ring structure, as in benzoate. The R group may be as bulky as an indole ring structure. For all monocarboxylates of the form X-CHR-COO − , the hydroxy (X = OH) analogs were the preferred substrates. The preference for keto (X = O) or acid (X = H) analogs was dependent on the bulkiness of the R group, such that the acid was preferred for small R groups and the 2-ketoacid was preferred for more bulky R groups. The C 4 to C 6 dicarboxylates succinate, glutarate, and adipate were also substrates of CitP. The broad substrate specificity is discussed in the context of a model of the binding site of CitP. Many of the substrates of CitP are intermediates or products of amino acid metabolism, suggesting that CitP may have a broader physiological function than its role in citrate fermentation alone.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-society-for-microbiology/substrate-specificity-of-the-citrate-transporter-citp-of-lactococcus-HZJ06Sh03d

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Society For Microbiology
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the American society for Microbiology.
ISSN
0021-9193
eISSN
1098-5530
DOI
10.1128/JB.00196-12
pmid
22563050
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Substrate Specificity of the Citrate Transporter CitP of Lactococcus lactis Agata M. Pudlik a , b , c and Juke S. Lolkema b a Top Institute Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands b Molecular Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands c The Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentations/NCSB, Delft, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The citrate transporter CitP of lactic acid bacteria catalyzes electrogenic precursor-product exchange of citrate versus l -lactate during citrate-glucose cometabolism. In the absence of sugar, l -lactate is replaced by the metabolic intermediates/end products pyruvate, α-acetolactate, and acetate. In this study, the binding and translocation properties of CitP were analyzed systematically for a wide variety of mono- and dicarboxylates of the form X-CR 2 -COO − , where X represents OH (2-hydroxy acid), O (2-keto acid), or H (acid) and R groups differ in size, hydrophobicity, and composition. It follows that CitP is a very promiscuous carboxylate transporter. A carboxylate group is both essential and sufficient for recognition by the transporter. A C-2 atom is not essential, formate is a substrate, and C-2 may be part of a ring structure, as in benzoate. The R group may be as bulky as an indole ring structure. For all monocarboxylates of the form X-CHR-COO − , the hydroxy (X = OH) analogs were the preferred substrates. The preference for keto (X = O) or acid (X = H) analogs was dependent on the bulkiness of the R group, such that the acid was preferred for small R groups and the 2-ketoacid was preferred for more bulky R groups. The C 4 to C 6 dicarboxylates succinate, glutarate, and adipate were also substrates of CitP. The broad substrate specificity is discussed in the context of a model of the binding site of CitP. Many of the substrates of CitP are intermediates or products of amino acid metabolism, suggesting that CitP may have a broader physiological function than its role in citrate fermentation alone.

Journal

Journal of BacteriologyAmerican Society For Microbiology

Published: Jul 15, 2012

References