Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Production of Autoinducer 2 in Salmonella enterica Serovar Thompson Contributes to Its Fitness in Chickens but Not on Cilantro Leaf Surfaces

Production of Autoinducer 2 in Salmonella enterica Serovar Thompson Contributes to Its Fitness in... Production of Autoinducer 2 in Salmonella enterica Serovar Thompson Contributes to Its Fitness in Chickens but Not on Cilantro Leaf Surfaces M. T. Brandl * , W. G. Miller , A. H. Bates and R. E. Mandrell Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California 94710 ABSTRACT Food-borne illness caused by Salmonella enterica has been linked traditionally to poultry products but is associated increasingly with fresh fruits and vegetables. We have investigated the role of the production of autoinducer 2 (AI-2) in the ability of S. enterica serovar Thompson to colonize the chicken intestine and the cilantro phyllosphere. A mutant of S. enterica serovar Thompson that is defective in AI-2 production was constructed by insertional mutagenesis of luxS . The population size of the S. enterica serovar Thompson parental strain was significantly higher than that of its LuxS − mutant in the intestine, spleen, and droppings of chicks 12 days after their oral inoculation with the strains in a ratio of 1:1. In contrast, no significant difference in the population dynamics of the parental and LuxS − strain was observed after their inoculation singly or in mixtures onto cilantro plants. Digital image analysis revealed that 54% of S. enterica serovar Thompson cells were present in large aggregates on cilantro leaves but that the frequency distributions of the size of aggregates formed by the parental strain and the LuxS − mutant were not significantly different. Carbon utilization profiles indicated that the AI-2-producing strain utilized a variety of amino and organic acids more efficiently than its LuxS − mutant but that most sugars were utilized similarly in both strains. Thus, inherent differences in the nutrients available to S. enterica in the phyllosphere and in the chicken intestine may underlie the differential contribution of AI-2 synthesis to the fitness of S. enterica in these environments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Applied and Environmental Microbiology American Society For Microbiology

Production of Autoinducer 2 in Salmonella enterica Serovar Thompson Contributes to Its Fitness in Chickens but Not on Cilantro Leaf Surfaces

Production of Autoinducer 2 in Salmonella enterica Serovar Thompson Contributes to Its Fitness in Chickens but Not on Cilantro Leaf Surfaces

Applied and Environmental Microbiology , Volume 71 (5): 2653 – May 1, 2005

Abstract

Production of Autoinducer 2 in Salmonella enterica Serovar Thompson Contributes to Its Fitness in Chickens but Not on Cilantro Leaf Surfaces M. T. Brandl * , W. G. Miller , A. H. Bates and R. E. Mandrell Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California 94710 ABSTRACT Food-borne illness caused by Salmonella enterica has been linked traditionally to poultry products but is associated increasingly with fresh fruits and vegetables. We have investigated the role of the production of autoinducer 2 (AI-2) in the ability of S. enterica serovar Thompson to colonize the chicken intestine and the cilantro phyllosphere. A mutant of S. enterica serovar Thompson that is defective in AI-2 production was constructed by insertional mutagenesis of luxS . The population size of the S. enterica serovar Thompson parental strain was significantly higher than that of its LuxS − mutant in the intestine, spleen, and droppings of chicks 12 days after their oral inoculation with the strains in a ratio of 1:1. In contrast, no significant difference in the population dynamics of the parental and LuxS − strain was observed after their inoculation singly or in mixtures onto cilantro plants. Digital image analysis revealed that 54% of S. enterica serovar Thompson cells were present in large aggregates on cilantro leaves but that the frequency distributions of the size of aggregates formed by the parental strain and the LuxS − mutant were not significantly different. Carbon utilization profiles indicated that the AI-2-producing strain utilized a variety of amino and organic acids more efficiently than its LuxS − mutant but that most sugars were utilized similarly in both strains. Thus, inherent differences in the nutrients available to S. enterica in the phyllosphere and in the chicken intestine may underlie the differential contribution of AI-2 synthesis to the fitness of S. enterica in these environments.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-society-for-microbiology/production-of-autoinducer-2-in-salmonella-enterica-serovar-thompson-fQT1uFpkiI

References (35)

Publisher
American Society For Microbiology
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the American society for Microbiology.
ISSN
0099-2240
eISSN
1098-5336
DOI
10.1128/AEM.71.5.2653-2662.2005
pmid
15870357
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Production of Autoinducer 2 in Salmonella enterica Serovar Thompson Contributes to Its Fitness in Chickens but Not on Cilantro Leaf Surfaces M. T. Brandl * , W. G. Miller , A. H. Bates and R. E. Mandrell Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California 94710 ABSTRACT Food-borne illness caused by Salmonella enterica has been linked traditionally to poultry products but is associated increasingly with fresh fruits and vegetables. We have investigated the role of the production of autoinducer 2 (AI-2) in the ability of S. enterica serovar Thompson to colonize the chicken intestine and the cilantro phyllosphere. A mutant of S. enterica serovar Thompson that is defective in AI-2 production was constructed by insertional mutagenesis of luxS . The population size of the S. enterica serovar Thompson parental strain was significantly higher than that of its LuxS − mutant in the intestine, spleen, and droppings of chicks 12 days after their oral inoculation with the strains in a ratio of 1:1. In contrast, no significant difference in the population dynamics of the parental and LuxS − strain was observed after their inoculation singly or in mixtures onto cilantro plants. Digital image analysis revealed that 54% of S. enterica serovar Thompson cells were present in large aggregates on cilantro leaves but that the frequency distributions of the size of aggregates formed by the parental strain and the LuxS − mutant were not significantly different. Carbon utilization profiles indicated that the AI-2-producing strain utilized a variety of amino and organic acids more efficiently than its LuxS − mutant but that most sugars were utilized similarly in both strains. Thus, inherent differences in the nutrients available to S. enterica in the phyllosphere and in the chicken intestine may underlie the differential contribution of AI-2 synthesis to the fitness of S. enterica in these environments.

Journal

Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyAmerican Society For Microbiology

Published: May 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.