Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparison of in vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli.

Comparison of in vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against... Comparison of in vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli. L Verbist ABSTRACT In vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, moxalactam, SCE-1365, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, and cefsulodin, were compared against selected cephalothin-resistant or beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli or both. SCE-1365, cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime had very similar activities against Enterobacteriaceae; SCE-1365 displayed the highest activity, and ceftazidime displayed the lowest activity. These four antibiotics were about 20 times more active than cefoperazone and 50 to 100 times more active than cefoxitin and cefuroxime. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the other Pseudomonas species, ceftazidime showed the highest activity by far, followed by cefsulodin and cefoperazone. A close parallel resistance against P. aeruginosa isolates was observed between piperacillin on the one hand and cefoperazone and cefsulodin on the other. CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit StumbleUpon Twitter What's this? « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article doi: 10.1128/​AAC.19.3.407 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. March 1981 vol. 19 no. 3 407-413 » Abstract PDF Classifications Research Article Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in ASM journals Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of AAC Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Verbist, L. Search for related content PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Verbist, L. Related Content Load related web page information Social Bookmarking CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit StumbleUpon Twitter What's this? current issue December 2011, volume 55, issue 12 Alert me to new issues of AAC About AAC Subscribers Authors Reviewers Advertisers Inquiries from the Press Permissions & Commercial Reprints ASM Journals Public Access Policy AAC RSS Feeds 1752 N Street N.W. • Washington DC 20036 202.737.3600 • 202.942.9355 fax • journals@asmusa.org Print ISSN: 0066-4804 Online ISSN: 1098-6596 Copyright © 2011 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to AAC .asm.org, visit: http://intl- AAC .asm.org | More Info» var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-5821458-3"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy American Society For Microbiology

Comparison of in vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli.

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy , Volume 19 (3): 407 – Mar 1, 1981

Comparison of in vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli.

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy , Volume 19 (3): 407 – Mar 1, 1981

Abstract

Comparison of in vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli. L Verbist ABSTRACT In vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, moxalactam, SCE-1365, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, and cefsulodin, were compared against selected cephalothin-resistant or beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli or both. SCE-1365, cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime had very similar activities against Enterobacteriaceae; SCE-1365 displayed the highest activity, and ceftazidime displayed the lowest activity. These four antibiotics were about 20 times more active than cefoperazone and 50 to 100 times more active than cefoxitin and cefuroxime. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the other Pseudomonas species, ceftazidime showed the highest activity by far, followed by cefsulodin and cefoperazone. A close parallel resistance against P. aeruginosa isolates was observed between piperacillin on the one hand and cefoperazone and cefsulodin on the other. CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit StumbleUpon Twitter What's this? « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article doi: 10.1128/​AAC.19.3.407 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. March 1981 vol. 19 no. 3 407-413 » Abstract PDF Classifications Research Article Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in ASM journals Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of AAC Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Verbist, L. Search for related content PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Verbist, L. Related Content Load related web page information Social Bookmarking CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit StumbleUpon Twitter What's this? current issue December 2011, volume 55, issue 12 Alert me to new issues of AAC About AAC Subscribers Authors Reviewers Advertisers Inquiries from the Press Permissions & Commercial Reprints ASM Journals Public Access Policy AAC RSS Feeds 1752 N Street N.W. • Washington DC 20036 202.737.3600 • 202.942.9355 fax • journals@asmusa.org Print ISSN: 0066-4804 Online ISSN: 1098-6596 Copyright © 2011 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to AAC .asm.org, visit: http://intl- AAC .asm.org | More Info» var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-5821458-3"); pageTracker._trackPageview();

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-society-for-microbiology/comparison-of-in-vitro-activities-of-eight-beta-lactamase-stable-wnO7quhNYc

References (16)

Publisher
American Society For Microbiology
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the American society for Microbiology.
ISSN
0066-4804
eISSN
1098-6596
DOI
10.1128/AAC.19.3.407
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Comparison of in vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli. L Verbist ABSTRACT In vitro activities of eight beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporins, cefoxitin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, moxalactam, SCE-1365, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, and cefsulodin, were compared against selected cephalothin-resistant or beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli or both. SCE-1365, cefotaxime, moxalactam, and ceftazidime had very similar activities against Enterobacteriaceae; SCE-1365 displayed the highest activity, and ceftazidime displayed the lowest activity. These four antibiotics were about 20 times more active than cefoperazone and 50 to 100 times more active than cefoxitin and cefuroxime. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the other Pseudomonas species, ceftazidime showed the highest activity by far, followed by cefsulodin and cefoperazone. A close parallel resistance against P. aeruginosa isolates was observed between piperacillin on the one hand and cefoperazone and cefsulodin on the other. CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit StumbleUpon Twitter What's this? « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article doi: 10.1128/​AAC.19.3.407 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. March 1981 vol. 19 no. 3 407-413 » Abstract PDF Classifications Research Article Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in ASM journals Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of AAC Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Verbist, L. Search for related content PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Verbist, L. Related Content Load related web page information Social Bookmarking CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Google+ Mendeley Reddit StumbleUpon Twitter What's this? current issue December 2011, volume 55, issue 12 Alert me to new issues of AAC About AAC Subscribers Authors Reviewers Advertisers Inquiries from the Press Permissions & Commercial Reprints ASM Journals Public Access Policy AAC RSS Feeds 1752 N Street N.W. • Washington DC 20036 202.737.3600 • 202.942.9355 fax • journals@asmusa.org Print ISSN: 0066-4804 Online ISSN: 1098-6596 Copyright © 2011 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to AAC .asm.org, visit: http://intl- AAC .asm.org | More Info» var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-5821458-3"); pageTracker._trackPageview();

Journal

Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyAmerican Society For Microbiology

Published: Mar 1, 1981

There are no references for this article.