Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Gerhold, S. Gasser (2014)
INO80 and SWR complexes: relating structure to function in chromatin remodeling.Trends in cell biology, 24 11
B. Bartholomew (2014)
Regulating the chromatin landscape: structural and mechanistic perspectives.Annual review of biochemistry, 83
Dana Branzei, M. Foiani (2008)
Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycleNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 9
Jérôme Poli, S. Gasser, Manolis Papamichos-Chronakis (2017)
The INO80 remodeller in transcription, replication and repairPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372
Jacob Bonner, Xiaolan Zhao (2016)
Replication-Associated Recombinational Repair: Lessons from Budding YeastGenes, 7
F. Prado (2014)
Homologous recombination maintenance of genome integrity during DNA damage toleranceMolecular & Cellular Oncology, 1
X. Chen, D. Cui, A. Papusha, X. Zhang, CD. Chu, J. Tang, K. Chen, X. Pan, G. Ira (2012)
The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break endsNature, 489
M. Longtine, Amos III, D. Demarini, Nirav Shah, A. Wach, A. Brachat, P. Philippsen, J. Pringle (1998)
Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeYeast, 14
T. Tsukuda, A. Fleming, J. Nickoloff, M. Osley (2005)
Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeNature, 438
A. Carr, S. Lambert (2013)
Replication stress-induced genome instability: the dark side of replication maintenance by homologous recombination.Journal of molecular biology, 425 23
K. Knoll, S. Eustermann, V. Niebauer, Elisa Oberbeckmann, Gabriele Stoehr, Kevin Schall, A. Tosi, Marianne Schwarz, Andrea Buchfellner, Philipp Korber, K. Hopfner (2018)
The nuclear actin-containing Arp8 module is a linker DNA sensor driving INO80 chromatin remodelingNature Structural & Molecular Biology, 25
Simona Negrini, V. Gorgoulis, T. Halazonetis (2010)
Genomic instability — an evolving hallmark of cancerNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 11
Junbiao Dai, Edel Hyland, D. Yuan, Hailiang Huang, J. Bader, J. Boeke (2008)
Probing Nucleosome Function: A Highly Versatile Library of Synthetic Histone H3 and H4 MutantsCell, 134
A. Tong, M. Evangelista, A. Parsons, H. Xu, Gary Bader, N. Pagé, M. Robinson, S. Raghibizadeh, C. Hogue, H. Bussey, B. Andrews, M. Tyers, C. Boone (2001)
Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion MutantsScience, 294
Dana Branzei, M. Foiani (2010)
Maintaining genome stability at the replication forkNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 11
I. Iraqui, Yasmina Chekkal, Nada Jmari, Violena Pietrobon, Karine Fréon, A. Costes, S. Lambert (2012)
Recovery of Arrested Replication Forks by Homologous Recombination Is Error-PronePLoS Genetics, 8
P. Andersen, Fang-fang Xu, W. Xiao (2008)
Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNACell Research, 18
J. Parker, H. Ulrich (2009)
Mechanistic analysis of PCNA poly-ubiquitylation by the ubiquitin protein ligases Rad18 and Rad5The EMBO Journal, 28
Irene Saugar, M. Ortiz-Bazán, J. Tercero (2014)
Tolerating DNA damage during eukaryotic chromosome replication.Experimental cell research, 329 1
Masafumi Hayashi, Kenji Keyamura, T. Hishida (2018)
Cyclin-dependent kinase modulates budding yeast Rad5 stability during cell cyclePLoS ONE, 13
Claudio Lademann, Jörg Renkawitz, B. Pfander, S. Jentsch (2017)
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A.Z to Promote Presynaptic Filament Formation during Homologous Recombination.Cell reports, 19 7
A. Niimi, A. Chambers, J. Downs, A. Lehmann (2012)
A role for chromatin remodellers in replication of damaged DNANucleic Acids Research, 40
K. Falbo, C. Alabert, Y. Katou, Su Wu, Junhong Han, Tammy Wehr, Jing Xiao, Xiangwei He, Zhiguo Zhang, Yang Shi, K. Shirahige, P. Pasero, Xuetong Shen (2009)
Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replicationNature Structural &Molecular Biology, 16
K. Falbo, Xuetong Shen (2012)
Function of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex in DNA replication.Frontiers in bioscience, 17
H. Ulrich (2011)
Timing and spacing of ubiquitin‐dependent DNA damage bypassFEBS Letters, 585
W. Heyer, Kirk Ehmsen, Jie Liu (2010)
Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes.Annual review of genetics, 44
Z. Jónsson, S. Jha, J. Wohlschlegel, Anindya Dutta (2004)
Rvb1p/Rvb2p recruit Arp5p and assemble a functional Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex.Molecular cell, 16 3
C. Lawrence, R. Christensen (1979)
Ultraviolet-induced reversion of cyc1 alleles in radiation-sensitive strains of yeast. III. rev3 mutant strains.Genetics, 92 2
I. Vassileva, I. Yanakieva, Michaela Peycheva, A. Gospodinov, B. Anachkova (2014)
The mammalian INO80 chromatin remodeling complex is required for replication stress recoveryNucleic Acids Research, 42
A. Tosi, C. Haas, Franz Herzog, Andrea Gilmozzi, O. Berninghausen, Charlotte Ungewickell, C. Gerhold, K. Lakomek, R. Aebersold, R. Beckmann, K. Hopfner (2013)
Structure and Subunit Topology of the INO80 Chromatin Remodeler and Its Nucleosome ComplexCell, 154
Xuetong Shen, G. Mizuguchi, A. Hamiche, Carl Wu (2000)
A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processingNature, 406
E. Papouli, Shuhua Chen, A. Davies, D. Huttner, L. Krejci, P. Sung, H. Ulrich (2005)
Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p.Molecular cell, 19 1
M. Zeman, Karlene Cimprich (2013)
Causes and consequences of replication stressNature Cell Biology, 16
S. Kozmin, Y. Pavlov, T. Kunkel, E. Sage (2003)
Roles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerases Poleta and Polzeta in response to irradiation by simulated sunlight.Nucleic acids research, 31 15
T. Hishida, Yoshino Kubota, A. Carr, H. Iwasaki (2009)
RAD6–RAD18–RAD5-pathway-dependent tolerance to chronic low-dose ultraviolet lightNature, 457
R. Wong, Néstor García-Rodríguez, N. Zilio, M. Hanulová, H. Ulrich (2020)
Processing of DNA Polymerase-Blocking Lesions during Genome Replication Is Spatially and Temporally Segregated from Replication Forks.Molecular cell
F. Sherman, G. Fink, J. Hicks (1979)
Methods in yeast genetics
M. Saravanan, J. Wuerges, D. Bose, E. Mccormack, N. Cook, Xiaodong Zhang, D. Wigley (2012)
Interactions between the nucleosome histone core and Arp8 in the INO80 chromatin remodeling complexProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109
Philipp Stelter, H. Ulrich (2003)
Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugationNature, 425
MS. Longtine, A. Mckenzie Iii, DJ. Demarini, NG. Shah, A. Wach, A. Brachat, P. Philippsen, JR. Pringle (1998)
Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeYeast (Chichester, England), 14
N. Haruta, Yoshino Kubota, T. Hishida (2012)
Chronic low-dose ultraviolet-induced mutagenesis in nucleotide excision repair-deficient cellsNucleic Acids Research, 40
M. Sinha, Shinya Watanabe, Aaron Johnson, D. Moazed, C. Peterson (2009)
Recombinational Repair within Heterochromatin Requires ATP-Dependent Chromatin RemodelingCell, 138
Haico Attikum, Olivier Fritsch, S. Gasser (2007)
Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double‐strand breaksThe EMBO Journal, 26
Ashby Morrison (2017)
Genome maintenance functions of the INO80 chromatin remodellerPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372
Dana Branzei, B. Szakal (2016)
DNA damage tolerance by recombination: Molecular pathways and DNA structuresDNA Repair, 44
M. Giannattasio, Katharina Zwicky, Cindy Follonier, M. Foiani, M. Lopes, Dana Branzei (2014)
Visualization of recombination–mediated damage-bypass by template switchingNature structural & molecular biology, 21
A. Chambers, P. Brownlee, Samuel Durley, T. Beacham, N. Kent, J. Downs (2012)
The Two Different Isoforms of the RSC Chromatin Remodeling Complex Play Distinct Roles in DNA Damage ResponsesPLoS ONE, 7
Kenji Shimada, Y. Oma, Thomas Schleker, Kazuto Kugou, K. Ohta, M. Harata, S. Gasser (2008)
Ino80 Chromatin Remodeling Complex Promotes Recovery of Stalled Replication ForksCurrent Biology, 18
H. Attikum, Olivier Fritsch, B. Hohn, S. Gasser (2004)
Recruitment of the INO80 Complex by H2A Phosphorylation Links ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling with DNA Double-Strand Break RepairCell, 119
Ashby Morrison, Jessica Highland, N. Krogan, Ayelet Arbel-Eden, J. Greenblatt, J. Haber, Xuetong Shen (2004)
INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair.Cell, 119 6
G. Narlikar, R. Sundaramoorthy, T. Owen-Hughes (2013)
Mechanisms and Functions of ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling EnzymesCell, 154
Kenji Keyamura, Kota Arai, T. Hishida (2016)
Srs2 and Mus81–Mms4 Prevent Accumulation of Toxic Inter-Homolog Recombination IntermediatesPLoS Genetics, 12
Amelia Hodges, Isaura Gallegos, Marian Laughery, Rithy Meas, Linh Tran, John Wyrick (2015)
Histone Sprocket Arginine Residues Are Important for Gene Expression, DNA Repair, and Cell Viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeGenetics, 200
Manolis Papamichos-Chronakis, C. Peterson (2008)
The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme regulates replisome function and stabilityNature Structural &Molecular Biology, 15
(2012)
The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 489:576–580
Xuetong Shen, R. Ranallo, E. Choi, Carl Wu (2003)
Involvement of actin-related proteins in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling.Molecular cell, 12 1
T. Halazonetis, V. Gorgoulis, J. Bartek (2008)
An Oncogene-Induced DNA Damage Model for Cancer DevelopmentScience, 319
Sandipan Brahma, Mzwanele Ngubo, Somnath Paul, M. Udugama, B. Bartholomew (2018)
The Arp8 and Arp4 module acts as a DNA sensor controlling INO80 chromatin remodelingNature Communications, 9
I. Unk, Ildikó Hajdú, András Blastyák, L. Haracska (2010)
Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance.DNA repair, 9 3
L. Waters, Brenda Minesinger, Mary Wiltrout, S. D’Souza, Rachel Woodruff, G. Walker (2009)
Eukaryotic Translesion Polymerases and Their Roles and Regulation in DNA Damage ToleranceMicrobiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 73
Jeong-Hyun Park, M. Cosgrove, E. Youngman, C. Wolberger, J. Boeke (2002)
A core nucleosome surface crucial for transcriptional silencingNature Genetics, 32
C. Gerhold, Duane Winkler, K. Lakomek, F. Seifert, S. Fenn, B. Kessler, G. Witte, K. Luger, K. Hopfner (2012)
Structure of Actin-related protein 8 and its contribution to nucleosome bindingNucleic Acids Research, 40
T. Hishida, Takayuki Ohno, H. Iwasaki, H. Shinagawa (2002)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae MGS1 is essential in strains deficient in the RAD6‐dependent DNA damage tolerance pathwayThe EMBO Journal, 21
B. Pfander, George-Lucian Moldovan, M. Sacher, C. Hoege, S. Jentsch (2005)
SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phaseNature, 436
David Álvaro, M. Lisby, R. Rothstein (2007)
Genome-Wide Analysis of Rad52 Foci Reveals Diverse Mechanisms Impacting RecombinationPLoS Genetics, 3
N. House, Melissa Koch, C. Freudenreich (2014)
Chromatin modifications and DNA repair: beyond double-strand breaksFrontiers in Genetics, 5
Robert Reid, M. Lisby, R. Rothstein (2002)
Cloning-free genome alterations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using adaptamer-mediated PCR.Methods in enzymology, 350
A. Gospodinov, T. Vaissiere, Dragomir Krastev, G. Legube, B. Anachkova, Z. Herceg (2011)
Mammalian Ino80 Mediates Double-Strand Break Repair through Its Role in DNA End Strand ResectionMolecular and Cellular Biology, 31
C. Hoege, B. Pfander, George-Lucian Moldovan, George Pyrowolakis, S. Jentsch (2002)
RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMONature, 419
Chihiro Horigome, Y. Oma, Tatsunori Konishi, R. Schmid, Isabella Marcomini, Michael Hauer, Vincent Dion, M. Harata, S. Gasser (2014)
SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodelers contribute to DNA double-strand break perinuclear anchorage site choice.Molecular cell, 55 4
Hailiang Huang, A. Maertens, Edel Hyland, Junbiao Dai, A. Norris, J. Boeke, J. Bader (2009)
HistoneHits: a database for histone mutations and their phenotypes.Genome research, 19 4
R. González-Prieto, Ana Muñoz-Cabello, M. Cabello-Lobato, F. Prado (2013)
Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage toleranceThe EMBO Journal, 32
T. Hishida, T. Ohya, Yoshino Kubota, Yusuke Kamada, H. Shinagawa (2006)
Functional and Physical Interaction of Yeast Mgs1 with PCNA: Impact on RAD6-Dependent DNA Damage ToleranceMolecular and Cellular Biology, 26
Molecular and Cellular Biology – American Society For Microbiology
Published: Mar 24, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.