Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
There have been a few studies that have examined howdifferent pilot configurations affect aviation consumer perceptions about trust,comfort, and willingness to fly (e.g., Rice et al., 2014, Int JAviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 1, 1–12; Winter et al., in press,J Air Transp Management); however, to date, no study wasfound that has examined how the relationship between pilot configuration andwillingness to fly might be mediated by different emotions. The purpose of thisstudy was to fill this gap by examining how affect (emotion) mediates thisrelationship, and more specifically, which emotion(s) mediate. In two studies,participants were presented with different pilot configurations and asked torate how they felt about them and how willing they would be to fly under thosecircumstances. Both studies revealed strong evidence that affect was a mediatorin this relationship, and that anger, fear, and happiness were the significantemotions in play. The findings from this study provide information on howconsumers view modifying the number of pilots that may be on board the aircraftcompared with controlling the aircraft remotely. It also identifies thatemotions play a significant role in these relationships.
Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors – American Psychological Association
Published: Jan 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.