Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Pearl (1988)
Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems
J. Heckman (1979)
Sample selection bias as a specification errorApplied Econometrics, 31
A. Dempster, N. Laird, D. Rubin (1977)
Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper
(1989)
LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications
J. Pearl (2000)
Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference
J. Steiger, A. Shapiro, M. Browne (1985)
On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential Chi-square statisticsPsychometrika, 50
T. Anderson (1989)
Linear latent variable models and covariance structuresJournal of Econometrics, 41
R. Mcdonald, P. Parker, Tomoichi Ishizuka (1993)
A scale-invariant treatment for recursive path modelsPsychometrika, 58
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1988)
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACHPsychological Bulletin, 103
J. Steiger (1988)
Aspects of Person-Machine Communication in Structural Modeling of Correlations and Covariances.Multivariate behavioral research, 23 2
R. Scheines, P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, Christopher Meek, T. Richardson (1998)
The TETRAD Project: Constraint Based Aids to Causal Model Specification.Multivariate behavioral research, 33 1
P. Bekker, T. Wansbeek, Arjen Merckens (1994)
Identification, Equivalent Models, and Computer Algebra
K. Mardia (1970)
Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applicationsBiometrika, 57
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1992)
Assumptions and Comparative Strengths of the Two-Step ApproachSociological Methods & Research, 20
J. Mcardle (1994)
Structural Factor Analysis Experiments with Incomplete Data.Multivariate behavioral research, 29 4
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler, Y. Kano (1992)
Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?Psychological bulletin, 112 2
Y. Kano (1992)
Robust statistics for test-of-independence and related structural modelsStatistics & Probability Letters, 15
L. Hayduk, D. Glaser (2000)
Jiving the Four-Step, Waltzing Around Factor Analysis, and Other Serious FunStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7
R. Mcdonald (1996)
Path Analysis with Composite Variables.Multivariate behavioral research, 31 2
J. Loehlin (1986)
Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis, 12
B. Muthén, D. Kaplan (1992)
A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the modelBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45
Thomas Verma, J. Pearl (1990)
Equivalence and Synthesis of Causal ModelsProbabilistic and Causal Inference
F. Fisher (1970)
A Correspondence Principle for Simultaneous Equation ModelsEconometrica, 38
B. Muthén, D. Kaplan, M. Hollis (1987)
On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at randomPsychometrika, 52
P. Bentler, D. Bonett (1980)
Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance StructuresPsychological Bulletin, 88
R. Mcdonald (1999)
Test Theory: A Unified Treatment
M. Browne, R. Cudeck (1992)
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitSociological Methods & Research, 21
A. Satorra, P. Bentler (1994)
Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis.
James Arbuckle (1995)
Amos User''s Guide
R. Mcdonald, H. Marsh (1990)
Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit.Psychological Bulletin, 107
D. Rubin (1975)
INFERENCE AND MISSING DATAPsychometrika, 1975
S. Mulaik, R. Millsap (2000)
Doing the Four-Step RightStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7
J. Mcardle (1980)
Causal modeling applied to psychonomic systems simulationBehavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12
(1992)
Users’ reference guide.Chicago: Scientific Software International
J. Long (1983)
Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Preface to Lisrel
P. Bentler, Paul Dudgeon (1996)
Covariance structure analysis: statistical practice, theory, and directions.Annual review of psychology, 47
(1992)
The CALIS procedure: Extended user's guide
(1987)
1987).Multiple imputation for nonresponse
Figure 3. Path diagram, Convention 3: Disturbances distinguished from latent variables. REPORTING STRUCTURAL EQUATION ANALYSES
Allison (1987)
71
R. Maccallum, James Austin (2000)
Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.Annual review of psychology, 51
S. Breckler (1990)
Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern?Psychological bulletin, 107 2
Craig Enders, D. Bandalos (2001)
The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation ModelsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8
P. Curran, S. West, J. Finch (1996)
The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis.Psychological Methods, 1
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling, 6
J. Herting, H. Costner (2000)
Another Perspective on "The Proper Number of Factors" and the Appropriate Number of StepsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7
I. Stelzl (1986)
Changing a Causal Hypothesis without Changing the Fit: some Rules for Generating Equivalent Path Models.Multivariate behavioral research, 21 3
L. Taylor, A. Goldberger, O. Duncan (1974)
Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69
C. Fraser, R. Mcdonald (1988)
COSAN: Convariance Structure Analysis.Multivariate behavioral research, 23 2
P. Spirtes, T. Richardson, Christopher Meek, R. Scheines, C. Glymour (1998)
Using Path Diagrams as a Structural Equation Modeling ToolSociological Methods & Research, 27
J. Long (1983)
Covariance Structure Models: An Introduction to LISREL
R. Maccallum, D. Wegener, B. Uchino, L. Fabrigar (1993)
The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis.Psychological bulletin, 114 1
J. Sidowski (1968)
Behavior research methods and instrumentationBehavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1
L. Tucker, C. Lewis (1973)
A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysisPsychometrika, 38
(1994)
Path analysis: RAMONA: SYSTAT for DOS advanced applications (Version 6
K. Yuan, W. Chan, P. Bentler (2000)
Robust transformation with applications to structural equation modelling.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 53 ( Pt 1)
C. Montfort (1999)
A review of structural equation models with non-normal variablesPsychometrika, 64
M. Browne, A. Shapiro (1988)
Robustness of normal theory methods in the analysis of linear latent variate models.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41
D. Rubin (1991)
EM and beyondPsychometrika, 56
P. Bentler (2000)
Rites, Wrongs, and Gold in Model TestingStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7
(1995)
1995).EQS structural equations programs manual.Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc
P. Bentler (1989)
EQS : structural equations program manual
K. Jöreskog (1970)
A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System.Psychometrika, 1970
T. Raykov, Adrian Tomer, J. Nesselroade (1991)
Reporting structural equation modeling results in Psychology and Aging: some proposed guidelines.Psychology and aging, 6 4
P. Bentler (1990)
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological bulletin, 107 2
J. Mcardle, R. Mcdonald (1984)
Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model for moment structures.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 37 ( Pt 2)
What can we learn from the path equations ?
L. Hayduk, D. Glaser (2000)
Doing the Four-Step, Right-2-3, Wrong-2-3: A Brief Reply to Mulaik and Millsap; Bollen; Bentler; and Herting and CostnerStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7
C. Fornell, Youjae Yi (1992)
Assumptions of the Two-Step Approach to Latent Variable ModelingSociological Methods & Research, 20
B. Muthén (1989)
Multiple-group structural modelling with non-normal continuous variables.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42
J. Pearl (1998)
Graphs, Causality, and Structural Equation ModelsSociological Methods & Research, 27
R. Maccallum, M. Roznowski, Lawrence Necowitz (1992)
Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance.Psychological bulletin, 111 3
B. Muthén (1984)
A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicatorsPsychometrika, 49
C. Chou, P. Bentler, A. Satorra (1991)
Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: a Monte Carlo study.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 44 ( Pt 2)
R. Mcdonald (1978)
A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structuresBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31
W. Meredith (1964)
Notes on factorial invariancePsychometrika, 29
T. Little, Kai Schnabel, J. Baumert (2000)
Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples.
K. Bollen, J. Long (1993)
Testing Structural Equation Models
A. Shapiro, M. Browne (1987)
Analysis of Covariance Structures under Elliptical DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 82
P. Allison (1987)
Estimation of Linear Models with Incomplete DataSociological Methodology, 17
P. Bentler, D. Weeks (1980)
Linear structural equations with latent variablesPsychometrika, 45
R. Hoyle, A. Panter (1995)
Writing about structural equation models.
R. Mcdonald (1989)
An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentralityJournal of Classification, 6
M. Browne (1984)
Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 37 ( Pt 1)
J. Graham, S. Hofer (2000)
Multiple imputation in multivariate research.
(1995)
1995).SEPATH: STATISTICA version 5. Tulsa: StatSoft, Inc
(1997)
Mx: Statistical modeling
M. Browne, S. Toit (1992)
Automated Fitting of Nonstandard Models.Multivariate behavioral research, 27 2
H. Gollob, C. Reichardt (1987)
Taking account of time lags in causal models.Child development, 58 1
J. Heckman, Richard Robb (1986)
Alternative methods for solving the problem of selection bias in evaluating the impact of treatments
(1981)
1981).LVPLS 1.6 program manual: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation.Munich, Germany: Hochschule der Bundeswehr
K. Bollen (2000)
Modeling Strategies: In Search of the Holy GrailStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7
R. Mcdonald (1997)
Haldane's Lungs: A Case Study in Path Analysis.Multivariate behavioral research, 32 1
K. Bollen, Gerhard Armingert (1991)
OBSERVATIONAL RESIDUALS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELSSociological Methodology, 21
Yasuo Amemiya, T. Anderson (1990)
Asymptotic Chi-Square Tests for a Large Class of Factor Analysis ModelsAnnals of Statistics, 18
(1985)
Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program
A. Boomsma (2000)
Reporting Analyses of Covariance StructuresStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7
R. Hoyle (1997)
Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applicationsJournal of Marketing Research, 34
T. Micceri (1989)
The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures.Psychological Bulletin, 105
Principles for reporting analyses using structural equation modeling arereviewed, with the goal of supplying readers with complete and accurateinformation. It is recommended that every report give a detailedjustification of the model used, along with plausible alternatives andan account of identifiability. Nonnormality and missing data problemsshould also be addressed. A complete set of parameters and theirstandard errors is desirable, and it will often be convenient to supplythe correlation matrix and discrepancies, as well asgoodness-of-fit indices, so that readers can exerciseindependent critical judgment. A survey of fairly representativestudies compares recent practice with the principles of reporting recommendedhere.
Psychological Methods – American Psychological Association
Published: Mar 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.