Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Siegel, L. Fouraker, D. Ellsberg (1960)
Bargaining And Group Decision Making
J. Hodgson, C. Osgood (1963)
An alternative to war or surrenderThe Russian Review, 22
THE EXPERIMENT WAS ALLEGEDLY A SIMULATED BARGAINING SESSION BETWEEN A BUYER AND A SELLER, WHO COMMUNICATED VIA WRITTEN OFFERS. ACTUALLY, THE E SUBSTITUTED STANDARDIZED BARGAINING PATTERNS FOR THE OFFERS OF BOTH OPPONENTS, AND CONDUCTED SIMULTANEOUS BARGAINING SESSIONS WITH EACH OF THE SS. IN A FACTORIAL DESIGN, THE TYPE OF INITIAL OFFER, EXTREME OR MODERATE, THE FREQUENCY OF CONCESSION, MODERATE OR INFREQUENT, AND THE S'S ROLE, BUYER OR SELLER, WERE VARIED. THE MAJOR FINDINGS WERE: (1) SELLERS DID BETTER THAN BUYERS, BECAUSE SELLERS OPENED WITH A MORE EXTREME INITIAL OFFER; (2) FOR BARGAINING SUCCESS, AN EXTREME OPENING OFFER, PROBABLY COUPLED WITH INFREQUENT CONCESSIONS, WAS BEST; AND (3) MORE FREQUENT CONCESSIONS ELICITED MORE FREQUENT CONCESSIONS, BUT NOT GREATER MOVEMENT.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – American Psychological Association
Published: Oct 1, 1967
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.