Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?

Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? In 4 experiments, 144 depressed and 144 nondepressed undergraduates (Beck Depression Inventory) were presented with one of a series of problems varying in the degree of contingency. In each problem, Ss estimated the degree of contingency between their responses (pressing or not pressing a button) and an environmental outcome (onset of a green light). Depressed Ss' judgments of contingency were suprisingly accurate in all 4 experiments. Nondepressed Ss overestimated the degree of contingency between their responses and outcomes when noncontingent outcomes were frequent and/or desired and underestimated the degree of contingency when contingent outcomes were undesired. Thus, predictions derived from social psychology concerning the linkage between subjective and objective contingencies were confirmed for nondepressed but not for depressed Ss. The learned helplessness and self-serving motivational bias hypotheses are evaluated as explanations of the results. (4½ p ref) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Experimental Psychology: General American Psychological Association

Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?

Download PDF
45 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/judgment-of-contingency-in-depressed-and-nondepressed-students-sadder-uxCgZ6tbgl
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0096-3445
eISSN
1939-2222
DOI
10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In 4 experiments, 144 depressed and 144 nondepressed undergraduates (Beck Depression Inventory) were presented with one of a series of problems varying in the degree of contingency. In each problem, Ss estimated the degree of contingency between their responses (pressing or not pressing a button) and an environmental outcome (onset of a green light). Depressed Ss' judgments of contingency were suprisingly accurate in all 4 experiments. Nondepressed Ss overestimated the degree of contingency between their responses and outcomes when noncontingent outcomes were frequent and/or desired and underestimated the degree of contingency when contingent outcomes were undesired. Thus, predictions derived from social psychology concerning the linkage between subjective and objective contingencies were confirmed for nondepressed but not for depressed Ss. The learned helplessness and self-serving motivational bias hypotheses are evaluated as explanations of the results. (4½ p ref)

Journal

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General – American Psychological Association

Published: Dec 1, 1979

There are no references for this article.