Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Illusory trends in the observations of bar graphs

Illusory trends in the observations of bar graphs In this bar graph analysis, six variables were analyzed: horizontal or vertical mode of presentation, coarseness or fineness of the scale units, spacing distance between the bars, width of bars, bar length, and nearness or remoteness from the scale. The factors compared were equated either in identical comparisons or in groups where the factors and degrees were equated (but not in identical combinations of degrees). The probability of an illusory trend holding consistently was expressed in terms of its ratio to the sigma of the difference. Results reveal that the factors which should give the maximum amount of overestimation in combination are short bars, presented with wide spacing distances, coarse scale units, and narrow bars viewed vertically if the most important comparison is a long bar, and horizontally if it is short. The bar positions remote from the scale, also, give greater overestimation. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Experimental Psychology: General American Psychological Association

Illusory trends in the observations of bar graphs

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , Volume 20 (6): 12 – Jun 1, 1937

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/illusory-trends-in-the-observations-of-bar-graphs-2UkKj2bqrA

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1937 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0096-3445
eISSN
1939-2222
DOI
10.1037/h0060831
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this bar graph analysis, six variables were analyzed: horizontal or vertical mode of presentation, coarseness or fineness of the scale units, spacing distance between the bars, width of bars, bar length, and nearness or remoteness from the scale. The factors compared were equated either in identical comparisons or in groups where the factors and degrees were equated (but not in identical combinations of degrees). The probability of an illusory trend holding consistently was expressed in terms of its ratio to the sigma of the difference. Results reveal that the factors which should give the maximum amount of overestimation in combination are short bars, presented with wide spacing distances, coarse scale units, and narrow bars viewed vertically if the most important comparison is a long bar, and horizontally if it is short. The bar positions remote from the scale, also, give greater overestimation.

Journal

Journal of Experimental Psychology: GeneralAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Jun 1, 1937

There are no references for this article.