Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
In this bar graph analysis, six variables were analyzed: horizontal or vertical mode of presentation, coarseness or fineness of the scale units, spacing distance between the bars, width of bars, bar length, and nearness or remoteness from the scale. The factors compared were equated either in identical comparisons or in groups where the factors and degrees were equated (but not in identical combinations of degrees). The probability of an illusory trend holding consistently was expressed in terms of its ratio to the sigma of the difference. Results reveal that the factors which should give the maximum amount of overestimation in combination are short bars, presented with wide spacing distances, coarse scale units, and narrow bars viewed vertically if the most important comparison is a long bar, and horizontally if it is short. The bar positions remote from the scale, also, give greater overestimation.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General – American Psychological Association
Published: Jun 1, 1937
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.