Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research

Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research Despite the widespread use of exploratory factor analysis inpsychological research, researchers often make questionable decisionswhen conducting these analyses. This article reviews the major designand analytical decisions that must be made when conducting a factor analysisand notes that each of these decisions has important consequences for theobtained results. Recommendations that have been made in themethodological literature are discussed. Analyses of 3 existingempirical data sets are used to illustrate how questionable decisions inconducting factor analyses can yield problematic results. The articlepresents a survey of 2 prominent journals that suggests that researchersroutinely conduct analyses using such questionable methods. Theimplications of these practices for psychological research arediscussed, and the reasons for current practices arereviewed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychological Methods American Psychological Association

Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/evaluating-the-use-of-exploratory-factor-analysis-in-psychological-lfb07QhvhJ

References (130)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 American Psychological Association
ISSN
1082-989x
eISSN
1939-1463
DOI
10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of exploratory factor analysis inpsychological research, researchers often make questionable decisionswhen conducting these analyses. This article reviews the major designand analytical decisions that must be made when conducting a factor analysisand notes that each of these decisions has important consequences for theobtained results. Recommendations that have been made in themethodological literature are discussed. Analyses of 3 existingempirical data sets are used to illustrate how questionable decisions inconducting factor analyses can yield problematic results. The articlepresents a survey of 2 prominent journals that suggests that researchersroutinely conduct analyses using such questionable methods. Theimplications of these practices for psychological research arediscussed, and the reasons for current practices arereviewed.

Journal

Psychological MethodsAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Sep 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.