Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Cronbach (1960)
Essentials of psychological testing
J. Taylor (1953)
A personality scale of manifest anxiety.Journal of abnormal psychology, 48 2
G. Bergmann, P. Frank, C. Hempel (1960)
Sense and Nonsense in OperationismThe Scientific monthly, 79
G. Bergmann (1951)
The Logic of Psychological ConceptsPhilosophy of Science, 18
K. Spence (1957)
The Empirical Basis and Theoretical Structure of PsychologyPhilosophy of Science, 24
D. Campbell, D. Fiske (1959)
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological bulletin, 56 2
Wilfrid Sellars (1948)
Concepts as Involving Laws and Inconceivable without ThemPhilosophy of Science, 15
Kausler Dh, Trapp Ep (1959)
Methodological considerations in the construct validation of drive-oriented scales.Psychological Bulletin, 56
K. Spence (1948)
The postulates and methods of behaviorism.Psychological review, 55 2
C. Spiker, B. Mccandless (1954)
The concept of intelligence and the philosophy of science.Psychological review, 61 4
J. Taylor (1951)
The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response.Journal of experimental psychology, 41 2
R. Carnap (1937)
Foundations of Logic and Mathematics
L. Beck (1950)
Constructions and Inferred EntitiesPhilosophy of Science, 17
M. Brodbeck (1957)
The Philosophy of Science and Educational ResearchReview of Educational Research, 27
R. Russell (1958)
Report of testimony at a congressional hearing.American Psychologist, 13
K. Spence (1958)
A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations.American Psychologist, 13
A. Anastasi (1950)
The Concept of Validity in the Interpretation of Test ScoresEducational and Psychological Measurement, 10
L. Mead, S. Stevens (1951)
Handbook of experimental psychology
K. Spence, L. Ross (1959)
A methodological study of the form and latency of eyelid responses in conditioning.Journal of experimental psychology, 58
J. Loevinger (1957)
Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological TheoryPsychological Reports, 3
H. Johnson (1954)
On verifying hypotheses by verifying their implicates.The American journal of psychology, 67 4
G. Bergmann, K. Spence (1941)
Operationism and Theory in PsychologyPsychological Review, 48
P. Meehl (1956)
Wanted—a good cook-book.American Psychologist, 11
K. Spence (1944)
The nature of theory construction in contemporary psychology.Psychological Review, 51
Arthur Pap, A. Caracciolo, V. Somenzi (1955)
Reduction-Sentences and Open Concepts
C. Hempel (1952)
Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science
J. Tukey, L. Thurstone (1947)
Multiple-Factor Analysis
M. Brodbeck (1958)
Methodological Individualisms: Definition and ReductionPhilosophy of Science, 25
M. Brodbeck (1960)
Models, Meaning and Theories*
L. Cronbach (1957)
The two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 12
G. Bergmann, E. Frenkel-Brunswik (1955)
Psychoanalysis and the Unity of ScienceThe Journal of Philosophy, 52
R. Jessor, K. Hammond (1957)
Construct validity and the Taylor anxiety scale.Psychological bulletin, 54 3
L. Cronbach, P. Meehl (1955)
Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological bulletin, 52 4
W. Garner, H. Hake, C. Eriksen (1956)
Operationism and the concept of perception.Psychological review, 63 3
G. Bergmann (1943)
Outline of an Empiricist Philosophy of PhysicsAmerican Journal of Physics, 11
"The renaming of the process of building a theory of behavior by the new term "construct validity' contributes nothing to the understanding of the process nor to the usefulness of the concepts. The introduction into discussion of psychological theorizing of the aspects of construct validity discussed . . . creates, at best, unnecessary confusion and at worst, a nonempirical, nonscientific approach to the study of behavior." Terminology of logical behaviorism and techniques of an "operational methodology" are preferred. "It is . . . recommended that the formulation of construct validity, as presented in the several papers noted in this critique, be eliminated from further consideration as a way of speaking about psychological concepts, laws, and theories."
American Psychologist – American Psychological Association
Published: Oct 1, 1959
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.