Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Variation of magnetic properties of a carbon steel and a chrome steel with per cent carbon, for annealed and quenched samples. —Two series of small steel bars were prepared with carbon varying from.01 to 1.17 per cent, one from Armco iron (total impurity.1 per cent or less), the other from chrome magnet steel with composition in per cent: Cr 2.23, Mn.24, Si.25, Ni.12, Cu.08, S.03, P.03. The carbon content was obtained and controlled by maintaining the bars along with steel of different carbide content until equilibrium was attained in hydrogen at 950°C. Magnetization curves are given for the different bars. The minimum reluctivity R (reciprocal of the maximum permeability ) is found to be a linear function of the carbon content for hardened steels, to 0.8 per cent C. For annealed carbon steels, R increases somewhat faster than the per cent C and for annealed chrome steels R shows a maximum at about.5 per cent and a minimum at about 0.8 per cent C. The magnetic intensity necessary for saturation varies in the same way as R . Magnetic potentiometer method of determining normal magnetization curves for short bars. —The bar and yoke apparatus used is arranged so that the small bar forms part of a closed magnetic circuit, and the magnetomotive force is distributed so as to be proportional to the reluctances of the bar and the yoke, respectively, by use of a magnetic potentiometer which consists of a solenoid of several thousand turns, with soft iron end plates which make contact with two points of the circuit. The magnetic flux was measured with a test coil connected to a dead beat ballistic galvanometer, by noting the deflection produced by reversing the flux. A special reversing rheostat was used to vary the current by 120 definite steps so as to give a definite magnetic cycle. Tested with samples of annealed Armco iron, this apparatus gave the same curve as the standard ring method.
Physical Review – American Physical Society (APS)
Published: Mar 1, 1924
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.