Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comment on the Equivalence of Various Theories of Gravitation

Comment on the Equivalence of Various Theories of Gravitation We may take the view that either the many scalar-tensor formalisms (of Jordan, Brans and Dicke, Hoyle, etc.) are all new and distinctly different theories of gravitation, or they are implicit within the theory of general relativity and therefore do not qualify as new theories of gravitation. There are cogent and persuasive reasons for adopting the latter view. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Physical Review D American Physical Society (APS)

Comment on the Equivalence of Various Theories of Gravitation

Physical Review D , Volume 8 (6) – Sep 15, 1973

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-physical-society-aps/comment-on-the-equivalence-of-various-theories-of-gravitation-FHkKGXzj2U

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 The American Physical Society
ISSN
1089-4918
DOI
10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1916
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We may take the view that either the many scalar-tensor formalisms (of Jordan, Brans and Dicke, Hoyle, etc.) are all new and distinctly different theories of gravitation, or they are implicit within the theory of general relativity and therefore do not qualify as new theories of gravitation. There are cogent and persuasive reasons for adopting the latter view.

Journal

Physical Review DAmerican Physical Society (APS)

Published: Sep 15, 1973

There are no references for this article.