Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Updraft and Downdraft Statistics of Simulated Tropical and Midlatitude Cumulus Convection

Updraft and Downdraft Statistics of Simulated Tropical and Midlatitude Cumulus Convection This paper presents a detailed analysis of updraft and downdraft statistics of simulated tropical oceanic and midlatitude continental cumulus convection, with an emphasis on the individual terms in the vertical momentum budget. Strong convective cores with absolute vertical velocities over 1 m s −1 and total condensate mixing ratios over 0.1 g kg −1 are sampled from several long-term simulations, driven by the observed large-scale advective forcings over the eastern Atlantic and Oklahoma regions. The median updraft and downdraft velocities are weakly dependent upon height, but the 90th percentile of the updraft velocity varies strongly with height, with a maximum in the middle troposphere. The median updraft thermal buoyancies are only about 0.5 K higher than those of downdrafts. As in aircraft measurements, positive thermal buoyancies exist for more than half of downdraft cores, and negative thermal buoyancies exist for a significant number of updrafts. The existence of the nonhydrostatic pressure gradients can explain such a surprising result first obtained from aircraft measurements. On the other hand, the largest differences between tropical and midlatitude convection occur in the strongest 10% of the drafts, not in the median drafts. For updrafts, the difference is related to the larger thermal buoyancy and relatively smaller condensate mixing ratio in midlatitudes, in addition to the larger dynamic triggering in the subcloud layer. The larger dynamic effects of the nonhydrostatic pressure gradient forces are responsible for the larger downdraft velocities in midlatitudes, in addition to the drier environments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences American Meteorological Society

Updraft and Downdraft Statistics of Simulated Tropical and Midlatitude Cumulus Convection

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-meteorological-society/updraft-and-downdraft-statistics-of-simulated-tropical-and-midlatitude-lDXOOEiCas

References (54)

Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0469
DOI
10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<1630:UADSOS>2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed analysis of updraft and downdraft statistics of simulated tropical oceanic and midlatitude continental cumulus convection, with an emphasis on the individual terms in the vertical momentum budget. Strong convective cores with absolute vertical velocities over 1 m s −1 and total condensate mixing ratios over 0.1 g kg −1 are sampled from several long-term simulations, driven by the observed large-scale advective forcings over the eastern Atlantic and Oklahoma regions. The median updraft and downdraft velocities are weakly dependent upon height, but the 90th percentile of the updraft velocity varies strongly with height, with a maximum in the middle troposphere. The median updraft thermal buoyancies are only about 0.5 K higher than those of downdrafts. As in aircraft measurements, positive thermal buoyancies exist for more than half of downdraft cores, and negative thermal buoyancies exist for a significant number of updrafts. The existence of the nonhydrostatic pressure gradients can explain such a surprising result first obtained from aircraft measurements. On the other hand, the largest differences between tropical and midlatitude convection occur in the strongest 10% of the drafts, not in the median drafts. For updrafts, the difference is related to the larger thermal buoyancy and relatively smaller condensate mixing ratio in midlatitudes, in addition to the larger dynamic triggering in the subcloud layer. The larger dynamic effects of the nonhydrostatic pressure gradient forces are responsible for the larger downdraft velocities in midlatitudes, in addition to the drier environments.

Journal

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences – American Meteorological Society

Published: Aug 6, 1999

There are no references for this article.