Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Polar Radiation Budgets of the NCAR CCM3 ** , ++

Polar Radiation Budgets of the NCAR CCM3 ** , ++ Present-day Arctic and Antarctic radiation budgets of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 3 (CCM3) are presented. The CCM3 simulation is from a prescribed and interannually varying sea surface temperature integration from January 1979 through August 1993. Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) data from 1985 through 1989 are used for validation of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) absorbed shortwave radiation (ASR) and outgoing longwave radiation (OLR). Summer ASR in both polar regions is less than the observations by about 20 W m −−2 . While the annual mean OLR in both polar regions is only 2––3 W m −−2 less than the ERBE data, the seasonal amplitude in OLR of 40 W m −−2 is smaller than the observed of 55––60 W m −−2 . The annual polar TOA radiation balance is smaller than observations by 5––10 W m −−2 . Compared to selected model and observational surface data, downward shortwave (SW) is too small by 50––70 W m −−2 and downward longwave (LW) too large by 10––30 W m −−2 . Surface downward LW in clear atmospheres is too small by 10––20 W m −−2 . The absence of sea-ice melt ponds results in 10––20 W m −−2 too much SW absorption during early summer and from 20 to 40 W m −−2 too little during late summer. Summer cloud covers are reasonably well simulated, but winter low cloud cover is too high by 0.5––0.7 compared to surface cloud observations. Comparison with limited satellite and in situ observations indicates cloud water path (CWP) is too high by about a factor of 2. While cloud particle sizes are approximately in the range of observed values, regional variation between maritime and continental droplet sizes is too strong over coastlines. Despite several improvements in CCM3 radiation physics, the accuracy of polar TOA annual radiation balance is degraded against the ERBE data compared to CCM2. Improvement in CCM3 polar radiation budgets will require improved simulation of CWP, clear sky LW, and sea ice albedo. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society

Polar Radiation Budgets of the NCAR CCM3 ** , ++

Journal of Climate , Volume 11 (6) – Jun 18, 1997

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-meteorological-society/polar-radiation-budgets-of-the-ncar-ccm3-mfB0m0VeEo
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0442
DOI
10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1246:PRBOTN>2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Present-day Arctic and Antarctic radiation budgets of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 3 (CCM3) are presented. The CCM3 simulation is from a prescribed and interannually varying sea surface temperature integration from January 1979 through August 1993. Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) data from 1985 through 1989 are used for validation of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) absorbed shortwave radiation (ASR) and outgoing longwave radiation (OLR). Summer ASR in both polar regions is less than the observations by about 20 W m −−2 . While the annual mean OLR in both polar regions is only 2––3 W m −−2 less than the ERBE data, the seasonal amplitude in OLR of 40 W m −−2 is smaller than the observed of 55––60 W m −−2 . The annual polar TOA radiation balance is smaller than observations by 5––10 W m −−2 . Compared to selected model and observational surface data, downward shortwave (SW) is too small by 50––70 W m −−2 and downward longwave (LW) too large by 10––30 W m −−2 . Surface downward LW in clear atmospheres is too small by 10––20 W m −−2 . The absence of sea-ice melt ponds results in 10––20 W m −−2 too much SW absorption during early summer and from 20 to 40 W m −−2 too little during late summer. Summer cloud covers are reasonably well simulated, but winter low cloud cover is too high by 0.5––0.7 compared to surface cloud observations. Comparison with limited satellite and in situ observations indicates cloud water path (CWP) is too high by about a factor of 2. While cloud particle sizes are approximately in the range of observed values, regional variation between maritime and continental droplet sizes is too strong over coastlines. Despite several improvements in CCM3 radiation physics, the accuracy of polar TOA annual radiation balance is degraded against the ERBE data compared to CCM2. Improvement in CCM3 polar radiation budgets will require improved simulation of CWP, clear sky LW, and sea ice albedo.

Journal

Journal of ClimateAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Jun 18, 1997

There are no references for this article.