Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Large-Scale Vegetation Feedbacks on a Doubled CO 2 Climate

Large-Scale Vegetation Feedbacks on a Doubled CO 2 Climate Changes in vegetation cover are known to influence the climate system by modifying the radiative, momentum, and hydrologic balance of the land surface. To explore the interactions between terrestrial vegetation and the atmosphere for doubled atmospheric CO 2 concentrations, the newly developed fully coupled GENESIS––IBIS climate––vegetation model is used. The simulated climatic response to the radiative and physiological effects of elevated CO 2 concentrations, as well as to ensuing simulated shifts in global vegetation patterns is investigated. The radiative effects of elevated CO 2 concentrations raise temperatures and intensify the hydrologic cycle on the global scale. In response, soil moisture increases in the mid- and high latitudes by 4%% and 5%%, respectively. Tropical soil moisture, however, decreases by 5%% due to a decrease in precipitation minus evapotranspiration. The direct, physiological response of plants to elevated CO 2 generally acts to weaken the earth’’s hydrologic cycle by lowering transpiration rates across the globe. Lowering transpiration alone would tend to enhance soil moisture. However, reduced recirculation of water in the atmosphere, which lowers precipitation, leads to more arid conditions overall (simulated global soil moisture decreases by 1%%), particularly in the Tropics and midlatitudes. Allowing structural changes in the vegetation cover (in response to changes in climate and CO 2 concentrations) overrides the direct physiological effects of CO 2 on vegetation in many regions. For example, increased simulated forest cover in the Tropics enhances canopy evapotranspiration overall, offsetting the decreased transpiration due to lower leaf conductance. As a result of increased circulation of moisture through the hydrologic cycle, precipitation increases and soil moisture returns to the value simulated with just the radiative effects of elevated CO 2 . However, in the highly continental midlatitudes, changes in vegetation cover cause soil moisture to decline by an additional 2%%. Here, precipitation does not respond sufficiently to increased plant-water uptake, due to a limited source of external moisture into the region. These results illustrate that vegetation feedbacks may operate differently according to regional characteristics of the climate and vegetation cover. In particular, it is found that CO 2 fertilization can cause either an increase or a decrease in available soil moisture, depending on the associated changes in vegetation cover and the ability of the regional climate to recirculate water vapor. This is in direct contrast to the view that CO 2 fertilization will enhance soil moisture and runoff across the globe: a view that neglects changes in vegetation structure and local climatic feedbacks. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society

Large-Scale Vegetation Feedbacks on a Doubled CO 2 Climate

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-meteorological-society/large-scale-vegetation-feedbacks-on-a-doubled-co-2-climate-oaNqJies9I
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0442
DOI
10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1313:LSVFOA>2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Changes in vegetation cover are known to influence the climate system by modifying the radiative, momentum, and hydrologic balance of the land surface. To explore the interactions between terrestrial vegetation and the atmosphere for doubled atmospheric CO 2 concentrations, the newly developed fully coupled GENESIS––IBIS climate––vegetation model is used. The simulated climatic response to the radiative and physiological effects of elevated CO 2 concentrations, as well as to ensuing simulated shifts in global vegetation patterns is investigated. The radiative effects of elevated CO 2 concentrations raise temperatures and intensify the hydrologic cycle on the global scale. In response, soil moisture increases in the mid- and high latitudes by 4%% and 5%%, respectively. Tropical soil moisture, however, decreases by 5%% due to a decrease in precipitation minus evapotranspiration. The direct, physiological response of plants to elevated CO 2 generally acts to weaken the earth’’s hydrologic cycle by lowering transpiration rates across the globe. Lowering transpiration alone would tend to enhance soil moisture. However, reduced recirculation of water in the atmosphere, which lowers precipitation, leads to more arid conditions overall (simulated global soil moisture decreases by 1%%), particularly in the Tropics and midlatitudes. Allowing structural changes in the vegetation cover (in response to changes in climate and CO 2 concentrations) overrides the direct physiological effects of CO 2 on vegetation in many regions. For example, increased simulated forest cover in the Tropics enhances canopy evapotranspiration overall, offsetting the decreased transpiration due to lower leaf conductance. As a result of increased circulation of moisture through the hydrologic cycle, precipitation increases and soil moisture returns to the value simulated with just the radiative effects of elevated CO 2 . However, in the highly continental midlatitudes, changes in vegetation cover cause soil moisture to decline by an additional 2%%. Here, precipitation does not respond sufficiently to increased plant-water uptake, due to a limited source of external moisture into the region. These results illustrate that vegetation feedbacks may operate differently according to regional characteristics of the climate and vegetation cover. In particular, it is found that CO 2 fertilization can cause either an increase or a decrease in available soil moisture, depending on the associated changes in vegetation cover and the ability of the regional climate to recirculate water vapor. This is in direct contrast to the view that CO 2 fertilization will enhance soil moisture and runoff across the globe: a view that neglects changes in vegetation structure and local climatic feedbacks.

Journal

Journal of ClimateAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Feb 22, 1999

There are no references for this article.