Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Isopycnal Averaging at Constant Height. Part II: Relating to the Residual Streamfunction in Eulerian Space

Isopycnal Averaging at Constant Height. Part II: Relating to the Residual Streamfunction in... In Part I , the ““vertical”” transport streamfunction was defined as resulting from isopycnic averaging at constant height in the same way that the meridional streamfunction results from averaging at constant latitude. Part II here discusses the relationship between these two isopycnic streamfunctions and the Eulerian residual streamfunction that arises from the transformed Eulerian mean (TEM). It is known that the meridional isopycnic streamfunction can be approximated by a Taylor expansion to give an Eulerian residual streamfunction involving the horizontal eddy flux. This Taylor expansion approximation works well in the interior, removing the spurious mixing associated with the simple Eulerian-averaged streamfunction. However, it fails near the surface where isopycnals outcrop to the surface. It can be shown in a similar way that the vertical isopycnic streamfunction can formally be approximated by a residual streamfunction involving the vertical eddy flux. However, if horizontal isopycnal displacements are large, this approximation fails even in the ocean interior. Inspired by the two different residual streamfunctions, a more general form of TEM formulation is explored. It is shown that the different TEM residual streamfunctions arise from decomposing the eddy flux into a component along isopycnals, which leads to advective flow, and a remaining diffusive component, which is oriented either vertically or horizontally. In theory the diffusive flux can be oriented in any direction, although in practice the orientation should be such that neither the advective flow nor the diffusive flux cross any boundary (surface, sidewalls, and bottom). However, it is not clear how to merge the continuously changing orientation in a physically meaningful way. A variety of approaches are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Physical Oceanography American Meteorological Society

Isopycnal Averaging at Constant Height. Part II: Relating to the Residual Streamfunction in Eulerian Space

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-meteorological-society/isopycnal-averaging-at-constant-height-part-ii-relating-to-the-fwmcEe4V5h
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0485
DOI
10.1175/JPO2650.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In Part I , the ““vertical”” transport streamfunction was defined as resulting from isopycnic averaging at constant height in the same way that the meridional streamfunction results from averaging at constant latitude. Part II here discusses the relationship between these two isopycnic streamfunctions and the Eulerian residual streamfunction that arises from the transformed Eulerian mean (TEM). It is known that the meridional isopycnic streamfunction can be approximated by a Taylor expansion to give an Eulerian residual streamfunction involving the horizontal eddy flux. This Taylor expansion approximation works well in the interior, removing the spurious mixing associated with the simple Eulerian-averaged streamfunction. However, it fails near the surface where isopycnals outcrop to the surface. It can be shown in a similar way that the vertical isopycnic streamfunction can formally be approximated by a residual streamfunction involving the vertical eddy flux. However, if horizontal isopycnal displacements are large, this approximation fails even in the ocean interior. Inspired by the two different residual streamfunctions, a more general form of TEM formulation is explored. It is shown that the different TEM residual streamfunctions arise from decomposing the eddy flux into a component along isopycnals, which leads to advective flow, and a remaining diffusive component, which is oriented either vertically or horizontally. In theory the diffusive flux can be oriented in any direction, although in practice the orientation should be such that neither the advective flow nor the diffusive flux cross any boundary (surface, sidewalls, and bottom). However, it is not clear how to merge the continuously changing orientation in a physically meaningful way. A variety of approaches are discussed.

Journal

Journal of Physical OceanographyAmerican Meteorological Society

Published: Mar 11, 2003

References