Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Examination of mixed-phase precipitation forecasts from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model using surface observations and sounding data

Examination of mixed-phase precipitation forecasts from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model... AbstractAccurate prediction of mixed-phase precipitation remains challenging for numerical weather prediction models even with high-resolution and a sophisticated explicit microphysics scheme and diagnostic algorithm to designate surface precipitation type. Since mixed-phase winter weather precipitation can damage infrastructure and produce significant disruptions to air and road travel, incorrect surface precipitation phase forecasts can have major consequences for local and statewide decision-makers as well as the general public. Building upon earlier work, this study examines the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model’s ability to forecast surface precipitation phase with a particular focus on model-predicted vertical temperature profiles associated with mixed-phase precipitation using upper-air sounding observations as well as the Automated Surface Observing Systems (ASOS) and Meteorological Phenomena Identification Near the Ground (mPING) observations.The analyses concentrate on regions of mixed-phase precipitation from two winter season events. The results show that when both the observational and model data indicated mixed-phase precipitation at the surface, the model represents the observed temperature profile well. Overall, cases when the model predicted rain but the observations indicated mixed-phase precipitation generally show a model surface temperature bias of <2°C and a vertical temperature profile similar to the sounding observations. However, the surface temperature bias was ~4°C in weather systems involving cold-air damming in the Eastern United States, resulting in an incorrect surface precipitation phase or the duration (areal coverage) of freezing rain much shorter (smaller) than the observation. Cases with predicted snow in regions of observed mixed-phase precipitation present subtle difference in the elevated layer with temperatures near 0°C and the near-surface layer. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Weather and Forecasting American Meteorological Society

Examination of mixed-phase precipitation forecasts from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh model using surface observations and sounding data

Ikeda, Kyoko; Steiner, Matthias; Thompson, Gregory
Weather and Forecasting , Volume preprint (2017): 1 – Feb 28, 2017
Download PDF
47 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-meteorological-society/examination-of-mixed-phase-precipitation-forecasts-from-the-high-zkM7meT18b

References (39)

Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0434
eISSN
1520-0434
DOI
10.1175/WAF-D-16-0171.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractAccurate prediction of mixed-phase precipitation remains challenging for numerical weather prediction models even with high-resolution and a sophisticated explicit microphysics scheme and diagnostic algorithm to designate surface precipitation type. Since mixed-phase winter weather precipitation can damage infrastructure and produce significant disruptions to air and road travel, incorrect surface precipitation phase forecasts can have major consequences for local and statewide decision-makers as well as the general public. Building upon earlier work, this study examines the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model’s ability to forecast surface precipitation phase with a particular focus on model-predicted vertical temperature profiles associated with mixed-phase precipitation using upper-air sounding observations as well as the Automated Surface Observing Systems (ASOS) and Meteorological Phenomena Identification Near the Ground (mPING) observations.The analyses concentrate on regions of mixed-phase precipitation from two winter season events. The results show that when both the observational and model data indicated mixed-phase precipitation at the surface, the model represents the observed temperature profile well. Overall, cases when the model predicted rain but the observations indicated mixed-phase precipitation generally show a model surface temperature bias of <2°C and a vertical temperature profile similar to the sounding observations. However, the surface temperature bias was ~4°C in weather systems involving cold-air damming in the Eastern United States, resulting in an incorrect surface precipitation phase or the duration (areal coverage) of freezing rain much shorter (smaller) than the observation. Cases with predicted snow in regions of observed mixed-phase precipitation present subtle difference in the elevated layer with temperatures near 0°C and the near-surface layer.

Journal

Weather and Forecasting – American Meteorological Society

Published: Feb 28, 2017

There are no references for this article.