Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparison of Arctic Climate Simulations by Uncoupled and Coupled Global Models

Comparison of Arctic Climate Simulations by Uncoupled and Coupled Global Models Simulations of present-day Arctic climate are assessed from suites of 1) 13 global atmosphere-only models from the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-II) and 2) 8 coupled atmosphere––ocean––ice models from the Data Distribution Center of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The assessment highlights the impact of coupling on the simulated Arctic climate, and also the improvement of the uncoupled models relative to a previous (early 1990s) phase of the AMIP project. The across-model variance of the simulated air temperature is larger in the coupled models than in the uncoupled models, and the spatial pattern of the variance indicates that differences in the coupled models' simulated sea ice contribute to the larger variance of temperature. The coupled models are also several degrees colder than the uncoupled models during the winter half of the year. As was the case with the earlier AMIP models, the simulated precipitation still exceeds the observational estimates, particularly over the terrestrial watersheds of the Arctic Ocean. The bias is larger in the coupled models and is strongest during the cold season. Both the coupled and the uncoupled models suffer from a bias of Arctic sea level pressure that will adversely impact the simulated sea ice motion and the spatial distribution of ice thickness. The bias appears as a shift of mass from the Beaufort sector of the Arctic Ocean to the Asian coastal seas. Improvements in simulated cloud coverage from AMIP-I to AMIP-II are apparent in a reduction of the across-model scatter of the AMIP-II cloud coverage and also in a more realistic annual cycle of the cloud fraction composited over the AMIP-II models. The Arctic surface radiative fluxes vary widely among the AMIP-II models, especially under cloudy skies. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Climate American Meteorological Society

Comparison of Arctic Climate Simulations by Uncoupled and Coupled Global Models

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-meteorological-society/comparison-of-arctic-climate-simulations-by-uncoupled-and-coupled-t4mdmt0UIz

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 American Meteorological Society
ISSN
1520-0442
DOI
10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1429:COACSB>2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Simulations of present-day Arctic climate are assessed from suites of 1) 13 global atmosphere-only models from the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-II) and 2) 8 coupled atmosphere––ocean––ice models from the Data Distribution Center of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The assessment highlights the impact of coupling on the simulated Arctic climate, and also the improvement of the uncoupled models relative to a previous (early 1990s) phase of the AMIP project. The across-model variance of the simulated air temperature is larger in the coupled models than in the uncoupled models, and the spatial pattern of the variance indicates that differences in the coupled models' simulated sea ice contribute to the larger variance of temperature. The coupled models are also several degrees colder than the uncoupled models during the winter half of the year. As was the case with the earlier AMIP models, the simulated precipitation still exceeds the observational estimates, particularly over the terrestrial watersheds of the Arctic Ocean. The bias is larger in the coupled models and is strongest during the cold season. Both the coupled and the uncoupled models suffer from a bias of Arctic sea level pressure that will adversely impact the simulated sea ice motion and the spatial distribution of ice thickness. The bias appears as a shift of mass from the Beaufort sector of the Arctic Ocean to the Asian coastal seas. Improvements in simulated cloud coverage from AMIP-I to AMIP-II are apparent in a reduction of the across-model scatter of the AMIP-II cloud coverage and also in a more realistic annual cycle of the cloud fraction composited over the AMIP-II models. The Arctic surface radiative fluxes vary widely among the AMIP-II models, especially under cloudy skies.

Journal

Journal of Climate – American Meteorological Society

Published: Jul 20, 2001

There are no references for this article.