Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
398 Vol. 63, No. 4, April 1982 Th e present analysis plans as represented by the abstracts suit , tw o and one-half years was non e to o long for the plan- ning process of a field program of the scale of CCOPE. divid e more or less evenly among mature storms, early Th e lon g plannin g period als o gav e the major participants storms , and special topics. The Convective Storms Division an opportunit y to start workin g together. This was probably is producin g an occasional communication called the CCOP E Newsletter , of which No. 8, November 1981, reports the a factor promoting what participants felt was a remarkably analysi s planning meeting in som e detail and includes a list of amicabl e and cooperative field effort. The teamwork that the abstracts. In terms of fulfilling the objectives for which developed , coupled with the rarity of major equipment fail- CCOP E was designed, there d o not appear to be any glaring ures and the excellent weather, made it possible to collect a gaps. However, the unusually stormy weather during CCOP E numbe r of high-quality, coordinated data sets
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society – American Meteorological Society
Published: Apr 1, 1982
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.