Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

TUBERCULOSIS OF THE OS COCCYGIS

TUBERCULOSIS OF THE OS COCCYGIS The pathologic changes in tuberculosis of the spine are well known, and the clinical picture of the disease is recognized without much difficulty. In contrast, tuberculosis of the os coccygis presents a rather characteristic pathologic picture, which has been but seldom described and is generally unrecognized clinically. This has led to failure of diagnosis, years of invalidism in the patients thus affected, and futile operative procedures for the cure of the lesion. The literature of the subject is sparce. Darrah 1 compiled twenty cases in 1893, and in 1904-1905 Caubet 2 reported three cases he had observed and reviewed twenty-five cases compiled from the literature, including Darrah's. With the exception of these reports, only one reference to the subject has been found since 1905. The histories of two patients observed during the past year will be given, as they illustrate well the essential pathology and clinical picture. Case 1. —Mrs. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

TUBERCULOSIS OF THE OS COCCYGIS

JAMA , Volume 82 (1) – Jan 5, 1924

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/tuberculosis-of-the-os-coccygis-0w2rfhDqmm

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1924 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1924.02650270025008
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The pathologic changes in tuberculosis of the spine are well known, and the clinical picture of the disease is recognized without much difficulty. In contrast, tuberculosis of the os coccygis presents a rather characteristic pathologic picture, which has been but seldom described and is generally unrecognized clinically. This has led to failure of diagnosis, years of invalidism in the patients thus affected, and futile operative procedures for the cure of the lesion. The literature of the subject is sparce. Darrah 1 compiled twenty cases in 1893, and in 1904-1905 Caubet 2 reported three cases he had observed and reviewed twenty-five cases compiled from the literature, including Darrah's. With the exception of these reports, only one reference to the subject has been found since 1905. The histories of two patients observed during the past year will be given, as they illustrate well the essential pathology and clinical picture. Case 1. —Mrs.

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jan 5, 1924

There are no references for this article.