Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Round-Ligament Operation

The Round-Ligament Operation To the Editor: —A good way to settle the Baldy-Webster priority controversy, in my humble opinion, would be for the disputants to shake hands and agree that they have discovered something that wasn't worth finding. Their operation practically sacrifices the inner strong ends of the round ligament, and puts all the weight and strain on the outer attenuated and weakened ends of the ligament. Their operation has no advantage over Alexander's or one of its modifications in uncomplicated cases, and certainly is not so good as Montgomery's or the old ventral suspension in those cases requiring laparotomy—ventral suspension to be used in postclimacteric cases only of course. The Baldy-Webster proposition's greatest weakness is the fact that it does not raise the uterus up unless the broad ligament is perforated low enough down to invite postoperative flexion. It simply draws the organ forward and in that respect is not so effective http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

The Round-Ligament Operation

JAMA , Volume LVI (20) – May 20, 1911

The Round-Ligament Operation

Abstract



To the Editor:
—A good way to settle the Baldy-Webster priority controversy, in my humble opinion, would be for the disputants to shake hands and agree that they have discovered something that wasn't worth finding.
Their operation practically sacrifices the inner strong ends of the round ligament, and puts all the weight and strain on the outer attenuated and weakened ends of the ligament. Their operation has no advantage over...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/the-round-ligament-operation-iIW0oH0WNK
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1911 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1911.02560200064029
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To the Editor: —A good way to settle the Baldy-Webster priority controversy, in my humble opinion, would be for the disputants to shake hands and agree that they have discovered something that wasn't worth finding. Their operation practically sacrifices the inner strong ends of the round ligament, and puts all the weight and strain on the outer attenuated and weakened ends of the ligament. Their operation has no advantage over Alexander's or one of its modifications in uncomplicated cases, and certainly is not so good as Montgomery's or the old ventral suspension in those cases requiring laparotomy—ventral suspension to be used in postclimacteric cases only of course. The Baldy-Webster proposition's greatest weakness is the fact that it does not raise the uterus up unless the broad ligament is perforated low enough down to invite postoperative flexion. It simply draws the organ forward and in that respect is not so effective

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: May 20, 1911

There are no references for this article.