Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
It is so common for men to dislike what is or seems absolutely new that we are not surprised that the Italian school of criminal anthropology—the so-called positivist school—should have so many enemies. For the teaching is so novel, so sweeping, so unpleasantly tinctured with fatalism, that it is naturally very obnoxious to the optimists of religion and science. But we imagine that much that is felt by excellent men on this subject is prejudice (if the word be not too severe) springing from a superficial knowledge of the works of the Italians themselves and their coadjutors in France and Germany. It will doubtless surprise those who have no other notion of this science than what an acquaintance with the least discreet of authors1 affords, to be told that among those who have studied it with conviction are not only many of the most elegant of contemporary writers, but
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Feb 15, 1896
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.