Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE HYPOTHETICAL CASE IN MEDICAL EXPERT TESTIMONY.

THE HYPOTHETICAL CASE IN MEDICAL EXPERT TESTIMONY. The value of the hypothetical case in obtaining medical expert opinion is one of the questions in regard to which both lawyers and doctors appear to disagree. A recent editorial in one of our contemporaries quotes a prominent lawyer as saying that it serves a purpose in showing the utter worthlessness of the opposing testimony, presumably seeing in it no other use or value. It was admitted by him that in this it was a weapon that cuts both ways and he considered that its influence in one direction was counteracted by that in the other, so that its real effect is practically zero. If this notion is correct, no self-respecting expert would really care to go on the stand and answer a hypothetical question, and it would seem that no sensible lawyer would see any necessity for asking one, if the opinion obtained could be really at once counteracted http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

THE HYPOTHETICAL CASE IN MEDICAL EXPERT TESTIMONY.

JAMA , Volume XXVIII (5) – Jan 30, 1897

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/the-hypothetical-case-in-medical-expert-testimony-sGJlrwXKVj
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1897 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1897.02440050037004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The value of the hypothetical case in obtaining medical expert opinion is one of the questions in regard to which both lawyers and doctors appear to disagree. A recent editorial in one of our contemporaries quotes a prominent lawyer as saying that it serves a purpose in showing the utter worthlessness of the opposing testimony, presumably seeing in it no other use or value. It was admitted by him that in this it was a weapon that cuts both ways and he considered that its influence in one direction was counteracted by that in the other, so that its real effect is practically zero. If this notion is correct, no self-respecting expert would really care to go on the stand and answer a hypothetical question, and it would seem that no sensible lawyer would see any necessity for asking one, if the opinion obtained could be really at once counteracted

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jan 30, 1897

There are no references for this article.