Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
In humble gratitude I make a metaphorical genuflex for the distinction bestowed on me by election to preside over one of the oldest and most important sections of the greatest medical organization in the world. Truly it is an honor to be classed with the illustrious predecessors in this office—men who have been honored and revered by their colleagues not only in this country but all over the world where progressive ophthalmology is known. We are living in an advanced age. Progress is so rapid that it seems wise to pause for a moment in this mad rush to indulge in a bit of introspection. Are we adhering to the principles long established by our predecessors? Are we not inclined to indulge somewhat in commercialism in the wild rush for things which are supposed to be progressive? Is not the multiplicity of apparatus a temptation to indulge in commercialism? While
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Sep 7, 1929
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.