Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Winkler, K. Kappus (1979)
Human antirabies treatment in the United States, 1972.Public health reports, 94 2
R. Moore, R. Zehmer, J. Moulthrop, R. Parker (1977)
Surveillance of animal-bite cases in the United States, 1971-1972.Archives of environmental health, 32 6
Martin Rj, Schnurrenberger Pr, Norman Rose (1969)
Epidemiology of rabies vaccinations of persons in Illinois, 1967-68.Public health reports, 84 12
J. Mann, M. Burkhart, O. Rollag (1980)
Anti-rabies treatments in New Mexico: impact of a comprehensive consultation-biologics system.American journal of public health, 70 2
P. Schnurrenberger, R. Martin, G. Meerdink, N. Rose (1969)
Epidemiology of human exposure to rabid animals in Illinois.Public health reports, 84 12
R. Currier, J. Mccroan, D. Dreesen, W. Winkler, R. Parker (1975)
Epidemiology of antirabies treatment in Georgia, 1967-71.Public health reports, 90 5
W. Winkler (1980)
Animal bites--a continuing problem.American journal of public health, 70 2
J. Glosser, L. Hutchinson, A. Rich, R. Huffaker, R. Parker (1970)
Rabies in El Paso, Texas, before and after institution of a new rabies control program.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 157 6
Little is known about the epidemiology of human rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), an important problem whether examined by the cost, the number of persons treated, or the public health resources required. Twenty-one states participated in a surveillance of PEP in 1980-1981. When state health departments were involved, PEP was given correctly to at least 88% of persons. The highest incidence of PEP was in young people up to age 15 years, males, and those in rural areas. Postexposure prophylaxis occurred primarily during the spring, summer, and fall months. The epidemiology of PEP varies depending on the source of exposure and age. Domestic animals and rodents-lagomorphs accounted for PEP far out of proportion to their small role in animal rabies. Postexposure prophylaxis can be prevented for many by not keeping wild animals as pets and reduced by having physicians consult with state or local health departments before starting treatment. (JAMA 1983;250:1990-1996)
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Oct 21, 1983
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.