Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE CURD AND THE BUFFER IN INFANT FEEDING

THE CURD AND THE BUFFER IN INFANT FEEDING Acid milk of one kind or another has long held first place in the therapeutic armamentarium in the artificial feeding of infants with diarrheal disorders. Buttermilk, a by-product of the dairy industry and for generations a standard food for babies in Holland, found its way into scientific pediatric circles at about the beginning of the present century, chiefly through the efforts of Teixeira de Mattos.1 For many years it held its place as the ne plus ultra of artificial foods in the feeding of pathologic infants. Its evident superiority over fat free sweet milk was never seriously questioned, authoritatively, except by Czerny and Keller,2 in 1906, with whom it followed as a logical corollary to the view that in the fat lay the essential difficulty in artificial feeding. In the latter part of the second volume of the same edition2 (1917), and in the second edition, they, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

THE CURD AND THE BUFFER IN INFANT FEEDING

BRENNEMANN, JOSEPH
JAMA , Volume 92 (5) – Feb 2, 1929
Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/the-curd-and-the-buffer-in-infant-feeding-CjqBTO0VX9

References (7)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1929 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1929.02700310010004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Acid milk of one kind or another has long held first place in the therapeutic armamentarium in the artificial feeding of infants with diarrheal disorders. Buttermilk, a by-product of the dairy industry and for generations a standard food for babies in Holland, found its way into scientific pediatric circles at about the beginning of the present century, chiefly through the efforts of Teixeira de Mattos.1 For many years it held its place as the ne plus ultra of artificial foods in the feeding of pathologic infants. Its evident superiority over fat free sweet milk was never seriously questioned, authoritatively, except by Czerny and Keller,2 in 1906, with whom it followed as a logical corollary to the view that in the fat lay the essential difficulty in artificial feeding. In the latter part of the second volume of the same edition2 (1917), and in the second edition, they,

Journal

JAMA – American Medical Association

Published: Feb 2, 1929

There are no references for this article.