Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE ANTIVIVISECTION BILL.

THE ANTIVIVISECTION BILL. So many resolutions have been formulated and adopted by medical men as members of local, State and National associations, and so much has been printed in the lay as well as in the medical press, concerning the " Antivivisection Bill," now before the United States Senate, that it seems almost needless to refer in these columns to the arguments against it. The bill, S. 1552, entitled " A bill for the further prevention of cruelty to animals in the District of Columbia," was favorably reported to the Senate by Mr. Gallinger, May 26, 1896, from the Committee on the District, although the American Medical Association had entered an earnest protest against its passage " unless it shall first be shown by an impartial investigation that cruel and unnecessary experiments are being performed in the District of Columbia and that existing laws do not provide suitable punishment for cruelty to the domestic animals." From http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

THE ANTIVIVISECTION BILL.

JAMA , Volume XXVIII (4) – Jan 23, 1897

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/the-antivivisection-bill-xfVMRO0GXA
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1897 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1897.02440040033005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

So many resolutions have been formulated and adopted by medical men as members of local, State and National associations, and so much has been printed in the lay as well as in the medical press, concerning the " Antivivisection Bill," now before the United States Senate, that it seems almost needless to refer in these columns to the arguments against it. The bill, S. 1552, entitled " A bill for the further prevention of cruelty to animals in the District of Columbia," was favorably reported to the Senate by Mr. Gallinger, May 26, 1896, from the Committee on the District, although the American Medical Association had entered an earnest protest against its passage " unless it shall first be shown by an impartial investigation that cruel and unnecessary experiments are being performed in the District of Columbia and that existing laws do not provide suitable punishment for cruelty to the domestic animals." From

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jan 23, 1897

There are no references for this article.