Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Across a Biological Gradient of Serum Hepatitis B Virus DNA Level

Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Across a Biological Gradient of Serum Hepatitis B Virus DNA Level ContextSerum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level is a marker of viral replication and efficacy of antiviral treatment in individuals with chronic hepatitis B.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between serum HBV DNA level and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective cohort study of 3653 participants (aged 30-65 years), who were seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen and seronegative for antibodies against the hepatitis C virus, recruited to a community-based cancer screening program in Taiwan between 1991 and 1992.Main Outcome MeasureIncidence of hepatocellular carcinoma during follow-up examination and by data linkage with the national cancer registry and the death certification systems.ResultsThere were 164 incident cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and 346 deaths during a mean follow-up of 11.4 years and 41 779 person-years of follow-up. The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma increased with serum HBV DNA level at study entry in a dose-response relationship ranging from 108 per 100 000 person-years for an HBV DNA level of less than 300 copies/mL to 1152 per 100 000 person-years for an HBV DNA level of 1 million copies/mL or greater. The corresponding cumulative incidence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma were 1.3% and 14.9%, respectively. The biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma by serum HBV DNA levels remained significant (P<.001) after adjustment for sex, age, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, serostatus for the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), serum alanine aminotransferase level, and liver cirrhosis at study entry. The dose-response relationship was most prominent for participants who were seronegative for HBeAg with normal serum alanine aminotransferase levels and no liver cirrhosis at study entry. Participants with persistent elevation of serum HBV DNA level during follow-up had the highest hepatocellular carcinoma risk.ConclusionElevated serum HBV DNA level (≥10 000 copies/mL) is a strong risk predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma independent of HBeAg, serum alanine aminotransferase level, and liver cirrhosis.More than 350 million persons in the world are infected with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV).It is particularly endemic in Taiwan, where the infection is usually acquired perinatally or in early childhood.Individuals with chronic hepatitis B infection are at an increased risk of developing liver cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma; 15% to 40% of these individuals will develop these serious sequelae during their lifetime.Hepatitis B virus is not directly cytopathic, and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in individuals with chronic hepatitis B is a multistage, multifactorial process including the interaction between host and environmental factors.Risk factors for chronic HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma include sex, age, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, chemical carcinogens, hormonal factors, and genetic susceptibility.Seropositivity for the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is one of the most important risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma.The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with seropositivity for HBsAg ranges from 5-fold to 98-fold with a population-attributable risk of 8% to 94%.In our previous study, seropositivity for the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) was associated with an increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of developing hepatocellular carcinoma was 9.6 for individuals seropositive for HBsAg and 60.2 for those seropositive for both HBsAg and HBeAg compared with those seronegative for both HBsAg and HBeAg. The increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk in individuals seropositive for HBeAg remained significant regardless of serum level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and status of liver cirrhosis.Highly sensitive testing methods based on polymerase chain reaction have become available for measuring serum level of HBV DNA. In current clinical practice guidelines,serum HBV DNA level is used as a criterion for antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Effective suppression of serum HBV DNA is a marker of efficacy for antiviral therapy.Its implementation as the primary surrogate end point instead of liver histology in assessment of new antiviral therapies remains to be validated.There are no long-term follow-up data on the relationship between serum HBV DNA level and risk of liver complications. In a small nested case-control analysis,we reported a significant association between serum HBV DNA level at study entry and hepatocellular carcinoma risk among individuals seronegative for HBeAg. However, there were only a small number of hepatocellular carcinoma cases and controls included in this study. Neither hepatocellular carcinoma incidence nor change in serum HBV DNA level over time was studied.In this population-based, long-term prospective study, we followed up a total of 3653 individuals who were seropositive for HBsAg and seronegative for antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) at study entry. The goals of this study were to assess the biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by (1) serum HBV DNA levels at study entry and adjusted for other risk factors including age, sex, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated serum ALT level, and presence of liver cirrhosis at study entry; and (2) persistent elevation of serum HBV DNA level at both study entry and follow-up examinations.METHODSCohort Recruitment and Follow-upFigure 1shows the flow of participants through the Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/Cancer-Hepatitis B Virus (REVEAL-HBV) study. A total of 89 293 individuals aged 30 to 65 years, who were living in 7 townships in Taiwan, were invited to participate in the study. From 1991 to 1992, 23 820 individuals agreed to participate and provided written informed consent for interview, health examination, blood collection for serological and biochemical assays, and follow-up of health status through health examination, medical record review, and linkage with national health profiles on the national cancer registry and death certification systems. The health examination at study entry included abdominal ultrasonography and serological tests for HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HCV, and serum levels of ALT and α-fetoprotein. A total of 4155 participants who were seropositive for HBsAg and free of hepatocellular carcinoma at study entry examination were followed up with abdominal ultrasonography and serological tests until June 30, 2004. Serum samples that had been collected and frozen at study entry were adequate for HBV DNA testing in 3851 participants. Among them, 3653 were seronegative for anti-HCV and were included in this study. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the College of Public Health, National Taiwan University in Taipei.Figure 1.Flow of Study Participants in the REVEAL-HBV StudyAnti-HCV indicates antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV); HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; REVEAL-HBV, Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/Cancer-Hepatitis B Virus.Interview and Blood CollectionAll participants were interviewed in person using a structured questionnaire administered by well-trained public health nurses at recruitment. Information was collected on sociodemographic characteristics, dietary habits, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, medical and surgical history, and family history of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis. History of menarche, menopause, pregnancy, delivery, and use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy was also collected from female participants. Using standard sterile techniques, a 10-mL blood sample was collected at study entry and at follow-up examinations.Laboratory ExaminationsSerological testing was performed as follows: HBsAg and HBeAg by radioimmunoassay with commercial kits (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill); anti-HCV by enzyme immunoassay using second-generation commercial kits (Abbott Laboratories); ALT by serum chemistry autoanalyzer (Model 736, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using commercial reagents (Biomérieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France); and serum HBV DNA was measured by polymerase chain reaction using the Cobas Amplicor HBV monitor test kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind), an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for quantifying HBV DNA. It has a certified lower limit of detection of 300 copies/mL. At this level of HBV DNA, the test has a 98.1% positivity rate and a 100% clinical specificity rate. The manufacturer's procedures for sample preparation, storage, and testing were followed. Whole blood was collected with a vacuum blood collection tube without an anticoagulant, the serum was separated by centrifugation at room temperature and was stored in a sterile tube at −70°C. This procedure was accomplished within 6 hours of sample collection. Each sample run for HBV DNA included a replicate of the negative, low-positive, and high-positive controls, and each run was determined to be valid.To examine the impact of changing serum HBV DNA level on hepatocellular carcinoma risk, the subset of participants with a study entry serum level of HBV DNA of 10 000 copies/mL or greater was evaluated. The follow-up serum samples were collected either at the last follow-up examination or at the follow-up examination preceding the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Of the 1619 participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 10 000 copies/mL or greater at study entry, 1330 (82%) had adequate follow-up serum samples for testing.Ascertainment of Newly Developed Hepatocellular CarcinomaAll study participants were without hepatocellular carcinoma at study entry. Newly developed hepatocellular carcinoma cases were detected by follow-up health examination or by computerized data linkage with the profiles on the national cancer registry in Taiwan from January 1, 1991, through June 30, 2004. To ensure complete ascertainment, we also performed data linkage with the profiles on the national death certification system to identify cases not registered in the cancer registry system. The ascertainment of newly developed hepatocellular carcinoma was complete and accurate.In total, 164 incident hepatocellular carcinoma cases occurred during the follow-up period. Medical record verification of all hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses was based on the following criteria: a histopathological examination (66 cases); a positive lesion detected by at least 2 different imaging techniques (abdominal ultrasonography, angiogram, or computed tomography; 87 cases), or by 1 imaging technique and a serum α-fetoprotein level of 400 ng/mL or greater (35 cases). Several cases qualified based on more than 1 criterion.Statistical AnalysisThe person-years of follow-up for each participant were calculated from the date of recruitment to the date of the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, the date at death, or the last date of linked data available from the national cancer registry (June 30, 2004), whichever came first. Participants free of hepatocellular carcinoma at their death or at the end of follow-up were censored. Incidence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma were calculated by dividing the number of incident hepatocellular carcinoma cases by person-years of follow-up. Cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma by follow-up year was derived using the Nelson-Aalen method.STATA software version 7.0 (STATA Corp, College Station, Tex) was used for the statistical analyses.The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the associations between serum HBV DNA level and hepatocellular carcinoma risk adjusted for sex, age, HBeAg status, serum ALT level, liver cirrhosis status, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption. The adjusted HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived to assess the magnitude of the association between various predictors and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Statistical significance levels were determined by 2-tailed tests (P<.05). The dose-response relationship between serum HBV DNA level and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after adjustment for other risk factors was examined for statistical significance with a test for trend. The biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by serum HBV DNA level was further examined in stepwise subgroup analyses by sequentially removing participants seropositive for HBeAg, with an elevated serum ALT level, and with liver cirrhosis at study entry from the analysis.In the analysis of the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by the change of serum level of HBV DNA during follow-up, the HBV DNA levels at baseline and follow-up examinations were combined to categorize study participants. Adjusted HRs were then derived for each category. P<.05 was considered significant.RESULTSThe basic characteristics of the study cohort appear in Table 1. The majority were male (62%); older than 39 years (67%); never smoked (66%); never drank alcohol (87%); had a serum ALT level of less than 45 U/L (94%); were seronegative for HBeAg (85%); and did not have liver cirrhosis (98%). The frequency distribution of serum HBV DNA level at study entry of 3653 study participants appears in Table 2. There were 873 study participants (23.9%) with an undetectable HBV DNA level (<300 copies/mL), while 976 participants (26.7%) had a level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater. Participants seropositive for HBeAg had a significantly higher serum level of HBV DNA than participants who were seronegative for HBeAg (P<.001). Of 565 participants seropositive for HBeAg, 523 (92.6%) had an HBV DNA level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater. Of 3088 participants seronegative for HBeAg, 453 (14.7%) had a HBV DNA level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater.Table 1.Baseline Characteristics of the Study CohortNo. (%) of Participants (N = 3653)*SexFemale1393 (38)Male2260 (62)Age, y30-391216 (33)40-491014 (28)50-591058 (29)≥60365 (10)Cigarette smoking†No2416 (66)Yes1234 (34)Alcohol consumption‡No3195 (87)Yes451 (12)Hepatitis B e antigenSeronegative3088 (85)Seropositive565 (15)Level of ALT, U/L<453435 (94)≥45218 (6)Liver cirrhosis§No3584 (98)Yes69 (2)Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBV, hepatitis B virus.*Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding.†Data were not available for 3 participants.‡Data were not available for 7 participants.§Diagnosed with ultrasonography within 6 months of cohort entry.Table 2.Serum Level of HBV DNA and HBeAg Serostatus at Study Entry*HBeAg SerostatusTotal (N = 3653)Negative (n = 3088)Positive (n = 565)Level of HBV DNA, copies/mL<300 (Undetectable)865 (28.0)8 (1.4)873 (23.9)300-999372 (12.1)0372 (10.2)1000-9999773 (25.0)16 (2.8)789 (21.6)10000-99999625 (20.2)18 (3.2)643 (17.6)100000-999999298 (9.7)51 (9.0)349 (9.6)1 to 9.9 milllion96 (3.1)58 (10.3)154 (4.2)10 to 99.9 million42 (1.4)58 (10.3)100 (2.7)≥100 million17 (0.6)356 (63.0)373 (10.2)Abbreviations: HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus.*Values are expressed as number (percentage).Incidence RatesThere were 41 779 person-years of follow-up with an average follow-up period of 11.4 years (Table 3). Through follow-up health examination and data linkage with the national cancer registry and national death certification systems between January 1, 1991, and June 30, 2004, 164 new hepatocellular carcinoma cases and 346 deaths were identified. The incidence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma by serum HBV DNA level as well as other risk factors at study entry examination appear in Table 3. The incidence rates per 100 000 person-years increased from 108.3 for the undetectable HBV DNA level (<300 copies/mL) to 1152.0 for the HBV DNA level of 1 million copies/mL or greater in a dose-response relationship. The biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by serum level of HBV DNA at study entry examination was significant (P<.001). Compared with participants having serum HBV DNA levels of less than 300 copies/mL, the crude HR was 1.0 (95% CI, 0.5-2.2) for participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 300 to 9999 copies/mL; 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3-5.6), 10 000-99 999 copies/mL; 8.9 (95% CI, 4.6-17.5), 100 000 to 999 999 copies/mL; and 10.7 (95% CI, 5.7-20.1), 1 million copies/mL or greater. Sex, age, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated serum ALT level, and liver cirrhosis at study entry were also significantly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma development and were adjusted for in further multiple regression analyses.Table 3.Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Study EntryNo. (%) of Participants (N = 3653)Person-Years of Follow-upNo. of Hepatocellular Carcinoma CasesIncidence Rate Per 100000 Person-YearsCrude HR (95%CI)*PValueSexFemale1393 (38)16307291781.0Male2260 (62)254721355303.0 (2.0-4.5)<.001Age, y30-391216 (33)14393161111.040-491014 (28)11776473993.6 (2.0-6.4)<.00150-591058 (29)11837675665.1 (3.0-8.9)<.001≥60365 (10)3773349018.3 (4.6-15.0)<.001Cigarette smoking†No2416 (66)28037903211.0Yes1234 (34)13704715181.7 (1.2-2.3)<.001Alcohol consumption‡No3195 (87)367791213291.0Yes451 (12)4928428522.6 (1.8-3.7)<.001Hepatitis B e antigenSeronegative3088 (85)35584942641.0Seropositive565 (15)61957011304.3 (3.2-5.9)<.001Level of ALT, U/L<453435 (94)394691333371.0≥45218 (6)23103113424.1 (2.8-6.0)<.001Liver cirrhosis§No3584 (98)412701313171.0Yes69 (2)50933648221.8 (14.9-32.0)<.001Level of HBV DNA, copies/mL<300 (Undetectable)873 (24)10154111081.0300-99991161 (32)13518151111.0 (0.5-2.2).9610000-99999643 (18)7404222972.7 (1.3-5.6).006100000-999999349 (9)3845379628.9 (4.6-17.5)<.001≥1 million627 (17)685879115210.7 (5.7-20.1)<.001Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HR, hazard ratio.*Cox proportional hazard models were used.†Data were not available for 3 participants.‡Data were not available for 7 participants.§Diagnosed with ultrasonography within 6 months of study entry.Cumulative IncidenceThe cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma during the follow-up period by serum HBV DNA level at study entry examination appears in Figure 2. There was an increasing trend of cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence with increasing serum HBV DNA level at study entry examination for all participants. The cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence was further calculated in the stepwise analyses in which participants with seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated serum ALT level, and liver cirrhosis were removed sequentially. There was a dose-response relationship between cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and serum HBV DNA level for a subcohort of participants who were seronegative for HBeAg, had a normal ALT level, and did not have liver cirrhosis, which included most participants (80%) in this study.Figure 2.Cumulative Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Serum HBV DNA Level at Study EntryAll participants were seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and seronegative for antibodies against the hepatitis C virus. Asterisk indicates these participants were seronegative for the hepatitis B e antigen and had a normal level of serum alanine aminotransferase and did not have liver cirrhosis at study entry. HBV indicates hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.Table 4compares the cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence at the end of the 13th year of follow-up derived from the stepwise analyses. Approximately 15% of all participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 1 million copies/mL or greater at study entry developed hepatocellular carcinoma by the 13th year of follow-up compared with 1.3% of participants with undetectable levels of HBV DNA. The biological gradient of cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence by serum HBV DNA level remained prominent in all stepwise analyses. Among the 2925 participants seronegative for HBeAg with a normal ALT level and no liver cirrhosis, the cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence was 13.5% for HBV DNA levels of 1 million copies/mL or greater and 0.7% for those with undetectable levels of HBV DNA.Table 4.Cumulative Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by HBV DNA Level at Study EntryCumulative Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (N = 3653)*Seronegative for Hepatitis B e Antigen, %Only (n = 3088)Normal ALT Level (n = 2966)Normal ALT Level and No Liver Cirrhosis (n = 2925)Level of HBV DNA, copies/mL<300 (Undetectable)1.301.200.980.74300-99991.371.211.250.8910000-999993.573.683.423.15100000-99999912.179.548.557.96≥1 million14.8917.8819.5113.50Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBV, hepatitis B virus.*At the end of the 13th year of follow-up.Dose-Response RelationshipSeropositivity for HBeAg, elevated level of serum ALT, and presence of liver cirrhosis at study entry were significantly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk (Table 3). After adjustment for sex, age, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption, the HR for seropositivity for HBeAg was 6.9 (95% CI, 4.9-9.5; P<.001); elevated level of serum ALT, 3.8 (95% CI, 2.5-5.7; P<.001); and liver cirrhosis, 14.0 (95% CI, 9.4-21.0; P<.001).Level of HBV DNA was significantly associated with seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated serum ALT level, and liver cirrhosis at study entry. The independent effects of serum HBV DNA level on hepatocellular carcinoma development after adjustment for other hepatocellular carcinoma risk factors also were analyzed. Compared with participants having serum HBV DNA levels of less than 300 copies/mL, the adjusted HR of developing hepatocellular carcinoma was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.5-2.3; P = .86) for participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 300 to 9999 copies/mL; 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1-4.9; P = .02), 10 000 to 99 999 copies/mL; 6.6 (95% CI, 3.3-13.1; P<.001), 100 000 to 999 999 copies/mL; and 6.1 (95% CI, 2.9-12.7; P<.001), 1 million copies/mL or greater (Table 5). The adjusted HR was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.6-4.2; P<.001) for seropositivity for HBeAg; 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-1.7; P = .64) for elevated serum ALT level; and 9.1 (95% CI, 5.9-13.9; P<.001) for liver cirrhosis. In addition, male sex, increasing age, and habitual alcohol consumption were significantly associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in this long-term follow-up study.Table 5.Regression Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With Hepatocellular CarcinomaAll Participants (N = 3653)Hepatitis B e Antigen SeronegativeOnly (n = 3088)Normal ALT Level (n = 2966)Normal ALT Level and No Liver Cirrhosis (n = 2925)Multivariable-Adjusted HR (95% CI)*PValueMultivariable-Adjusted HR (95% CI)*PValueMultivariable-Adjusted HR (95% CI)*PValueMultivariable-Adjusted HR (95% CI)*PValueSexMale2.1 (1.3-3.3).0012.0 (1.1-3.6).031.6 (0.8-2.9).161.5 (0.8-2.9).24Age in 1-y increment1.09 (1.07-1.11)<.0011.08 (1.06-1.11)<.0011.09 (1.06-1.12)<.0011.11 (1.07-1.14)<.001Cigarette smokingYes1.0 (0.7-1.4).840.9 (0.6-1.4).691.1 (0.7-1.8).761.3 (0.7-2.3).35Alcohol consumptionYes1.6 (1.1-2.4).0091.7 (1.0-2.8).051.8 (1.1-3.1).031.7 (0.9-3.1).08Hepatitis B e antigenSeropositive2.6 (1.6-4.2)<.001Level of ALT, U/L≥451.1 (0.7-1.7).640.8 (0.4-1.7).62Liver cirrhosis†Yes9.1 (5.9-13.9)<.0017.9 (4.5-13.9)<.00111.7 (6.6-20.6)<.001Level of HBV DNA, copies/mL‡<300 (Undetectable)1.0<.001§1.0<.001§1.0<.001§1.0<.001§300-99991.1 (0.5-2.3).861.0 (0.5-2.4).941.3 (0.5-3.2).551.4 (0.5-3.8).5610000-999992.3 (1.1-4.9).022.6 (1.2-5.6).012.7 (1.2-6.3).024.5 (1.8-11.4).001100000-9999996.6 (3.3-13.1)<.0016.1 (2.9-12.8)<.0017.2 (3.2-16.6)<.00111.3 (4.5-28.4)<.001≥1 million6.1 (2.9-12.7)<.00110.6 (4.9-22.8)<.00114.3 (6.2-32.8)<.00117.7 (6.8-46.3)<.001Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HR, hazard ratio.*Cox proportional hazard models were used.†Diagnosed with ultrasonography within 6 months of study entry.‡At study entry.§For trend.In the stepwise analyses removing participants with study entry status of seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated ALT level, and liver cirrhosis sequentially, the dose-response relationship (P<.001 for trend) between hepatocellular carcinoma risk and serum HBV DNA level at study entry became increasingly stronger (Table 5). Among the 2925 participants seronegative for HBeAg who had a normal ALT level and no liver cirrhosis and compared with participants with serum HBV DNA levels of less than 300 copies/mL, the adjusted HR for participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 300 to 9999 copies/mL was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.5-3.8; P = .56); 10 000-99 999 copies/mL, 4.5 (95% CI, 1.8-11.4; P = .001); 100 000-999 999 copies/mL, 11.3 (95% CI, 4.5-28.4; P<.001); and 1 million copies/mL or greater, 17.7 (95% CI, 6.8-46.3; P<.001).Multivariable-Adjusted HRsWe further examined the association between hepatocellular carcinoma risk and persistently elevated serum HBV DNA levels at study entry and follow-up examinations. For participants who had a serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL or greater at study entry, we retrieved their serum samples collected at the follow-up examination just preceding the hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses or at the last follow-up examination for participants who had not developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Follow-up serum samples were inadequate for 289 (18%) participants with a serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL or greater at study entry examination. The median time between the study entry and follow-up serum samples was approximately 10 years (Table 6).Table 6.Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Serum HBV DNA Levels at Study Entry and at Last Follow-upLevel of HBV DNA, copies/mLNo. of Participants (N = 3653)*No. of Hepatocellular Carcinoma CasesMedian Time Between the Baseline and Last Follow-up Examination, yAdjusted HR (95% CI)†At Study EntryAt Follow-upSex, Age, Cigarette Smoking, and Alcohol ConsumptionPlus Seropositivity for HBeAg, Liver Cirrhosis,and ALT Level&numsp;<10000Not tested2034261.01.010000-99999&numsp;<10000256610.71.6 (0.7-3.9)1.3 (0.5-3.1)10000-9999910000-9999916119.20.5 (0.1-3.6)0.4 (0.1-3.2)10000-99999≥10000011059.93.5 (1.4-9.2)2.9 (1.0-9.8)≥100000&numsp;<10000146811.13.8 (1.7-8.4)1.9 (0.8-4.4)≥10000010000-999991201010.57.3 (3.5-15.3)4.3 (2.0-9.3)≥100000≥100000537559.910.1 (6.3-16.2)5.3 (2.9-9.7)Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HR, hazard ratio.*There were 289 participants whose last follow-up serum samples were not available.†Cox proportional hazard model was used.Among those who had serum HBV DNA levels at study entry of 10 000-99 999 copies/mL, a statistically significant increase in hepatocellular carcinoma risk (adjusted HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-9.2; P = .01) was observed for a follow-up level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater after adjustment for sex, age, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption. Among those with serum HBV DNA levels at study entry of 100 000 copies/mL or greater, a significant biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by follow-up HBV DNA level was observed (P<.01). The results remained unchanged after additional adjustment was performed for study entry HBeAg serostatus, serum ALT level, and presence of liver cirrhosis.Changes in HBV DNA level may be due to HBeAg seroconversion, treatment effect, or fluctuations in viral HBV DNA between tests. Because HBeAg seroconversion is likely to have had the greatest impact on change in HBV DNA level in this cohort, this relationship was explored in additional analyses. Of the participants seropositive for HBeAg, approximately 42% were seronegative for HBeAg according to the last serum sample available for testing. Of those who were now seronegative for HBeAg, the HBV DNA level in a greater proportion (18.5% compared with 1.1% in the group remaining seropositive for HBeAg) went from 100 000 copies/mL or greater to less than 10 000 copies/mL. Of the group remaining seropositive for HBeAg, 95.2% (compared with 55.4% in the group now seronegative for HBeAg) had an HBV DNA level remaining at 100 000 copies/mL or greater.COMMENTIn Taiwan, HBV infection is mostly acquired perinatally. Many individuals infected with HBV are seropositive for HBeAg and have extremely high-level viremia, normal serum ALT levels, and minimal liver disease.These individuals are considered to be in their immune-tolerant phase. Some of them develop chronic hepatitis B with an elevated serum ALT level later in life.Because treatment for HBV was not reimbursed by the universal national health insurance in Taiwan until 2003, the participants in this study have not received any antiviral treatment with interferon alfa or nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. The cohort in this study therefore represents a natural history cohort. To ensure that participants received treatment that is the standard of care, individuals with abnormal α-fetoprotein, ALT, or ultrasound tests were informed in a letter of the results and instructed to see their physician for follow-up evaluation. Individuals were free to discontinue participation at anytime for any reason. Additionally, all participants with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma were referred to a medical center of their choice for further evaluation. Based on the availability of reimbursement for HBV therapy in October 2003, individuals meeting the established treatment guidelines were referred to the National Taiwan University Hospital for evaluation.There are few other examples of a population-based cohort with prospectively collected data on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma with detailed information on serostatus for HBeAg and serum levels of HBV DNA and ALT. To the best of our knowledge, this study is one of the largest and longest follow-up studies on the association between hepatocellular carcinoma risk and serum HBV DNA level at study entry and follow-up examinations.Consistent with the findings we previously reported,there were significant associations between increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk and seropositivity for HBeAg, elevation of serum ALT level, and ultrasonographically detected liver cirrhosis within 6 months of entry in this study. Hepatitis B e antigen is a biomarker for the active replication of HBV in chronic hepatitis B patients. In this study, using a highly sensitive testing method based on polymerase chain reaction with a detection limit of 300 copies/mL for serum HBV DNA level, most participants with seropositivity for HBeAg (92.6%) had a highly elevated serum HBV DNA level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater. However, most participants seronegative for HBeAg (72.0%) still had a detectable serum HBV DNA level.A significant biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by serum HBV DNA level from 300 copies/mL (undetectable) to 1 million copies/mL or greater was observed in this study. The hepatocellular carcinoma risk started to increase significantly at a serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL, which is lower than the level (100 000 copies/mL) suggested by current clinical practice guidelines for making management decisions in the care of chronic hepatitis B patients.In this study, the majority of individuals with chronic hepatitis B (80%) were seronegative for HBeAg and had a normal serum ALT level at study entry and did not develop liver cirrhosis within 6 months of study entry. In this study, we found that serum level of HBV DNA was a prominent risk predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma independent of HBeAg status, serum ALT level, and the presence of liver cirrhosis. We also observed a significant dose-response relationship between serum HBV DNA level and hepatocellular carcinoma risk (P<.001). This biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by serum HBV DNA level remained significant in all stepwise analyses using the Cox proportional hazards models. The consistency of a dose-response relationship between serum HBV DNA level at study entry and hepatocellular carcinoma risk during follow-up suggests the importance of closer clinical monitoring and even antiviral treatment for those who have an elevated serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL or greater. The development of new antiviral agents capable of effectively lowering serum HBV DNA level regardless of HBeAg serostatus and serum ALT level may be important to lower the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients.Serum level of HBV DNA is a dynamic parameter in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The importance of persistently elevated serum HBV DNA levels has seldom been elucidated. In this study, we analyzed the serum level of HBV DNA at last follow-up examination among those who had a serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL or greater at study entry examination. For this analysis we used data from participants with a baseline HBV DNA level of less than 10 000 copies/mL as the reference group and we did not retest their follow-up serum samples. Making these participants the reference group serves to bias the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with persistent elevation of HBV DNA toward the null. This represents a conservative decision because some of these participants may have had elevated HBV DNA at follow-up examination. Among those who had a serum HBV DNA level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater, a significant reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma risk was observed with a decreasing serum HBV DNA level at follow-up examination in a reverse dose-response relationship (P<.01). Because most clinical trials of antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B are limited by their short period of follow-up, virological, histological, and biochemical markers are used to assess the efficacy of the therapy.It has been argued that serum HBV DNA level is a useful tool for comparing the antiviral potency of different antiviral drugs and strategies,but it is not the primary surrogate for clinical end points such as liver cirrhosis, liver decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma.The findings of this study provide strong longitudinal evidence of an increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk associated with the persistent elevation of serum HBV DNA level. This suggests that effective control of HBV replication indicated by the decrease in serum HBV DNA level following antiviral therapy can be expected to lower the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the long run.Important consideration should be given to the impact of HBV genotype on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in this population. In Taiwan, the HBV genotypes B and C are the predominant genotypes, and genotype C has been shown to be associated with higher HBV DNA levels and a greater risk of hepatocellular carcinoma than genotype B.In unpublished data from our cohort, among participants with HBV DNA levels of 100 000 copies/mL or greater, the frequencies of genotypes B and C were 79.3% and 20.7% in participants who were seronegative for HBeAg and 41.7% and 58.3% in participants who were seropositive for HBeAg, respectively. Also, the rates of the precore stop codon (G1896A) mutation were 63.7% for those who were seronegative for HBeAg and 7.2% for those who were seropositive for HBeAg. The complete ascertainment of the different genotypes and mutation rates in this cohort as well as their impact on hepatocellular carcinoma risk is the subject of an ongoing study.CONCLUSIONSerum level of HBV DNA may be used as a major risk predictor for hepatocellular carcinoma, independent of HBeAg serostatus, serum ALT level, and the presence of liver cirrhosis. Monitoring the change in serum HBV DNA level is recommended for the management of chronic hepatitis B patients. Randomized controlled trials comparing different therapeutic strategies in patients with elevated serum HBV DNA level but a normal ALT level may further contribute to the development of appropriate treatment guidelines in these patients. These patients, especially those seronegative for HBeAg, account for an increasing majority of chronically infected individuals and are at an increased risk of future hepatocellular carcinoma.Corresponding Author:Chien-Jen Chen, ScD, National Taiwan University, Room 1547, No. 1, Jen-Ai Rd Sec. 1, Taipei 10018, Taiwan ([email protected]).Author Contributions:Dr Chen had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.Study concept and design: Chen, Yang, Su, Huang, Iloeje.Acquisition of data: Chen, Yang, Jen, You, Lu, Huang.Analysis and interpretation of data: Chen, Yang, Su, Iloeje.Drafting of the manuscript: Chen, Iloeje.Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Chen, Yang, Su, Jen, You, Lu, Huang, Iloeje.Statistical analysis: Yang, Su, Iloeje.Obtained funding: Chen, Su, Iloeje.Administrative, technical, or material support: Chen, Yang, Jen, You, Lu, Huang.Study supervision: Chen.Financial Disclosures:None reported.Funding/Support:Dr Chen received a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb to conduct the laboratory tests for this study. This study also was supported by the Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Republic of China.Role of the Sponsor:Drs Iloeje and Su (employed by Bristol-Myers Squibb) were involved in the study design, development of the analysis plan, and interpretation of the data and writing of the manuscript. All data handling and statistical analyses were done by the staff at the National Taiwan University. At no time did the funding sources have access to the data.Other Members of the REVEAL-HBV Study Group:National Taiwan University Hospital: C. Y. Hsieh, H. S. Lee, P. M. Yang, C. H. Chen, J. D. Chen, S. P. Huang, C. F. Jan. National Taiwan University: T. H. H. Chen. National Defense Medical Center: C. A. Sun. Taipei City Psychiatric Center: M. H. Wu. Tzu Chi University: L. Y. Wang, S. Y. Chen. Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital: K. E. Chu. Huhsi Health Center, Penghu County: S. C. Ho, T. G. Lu. Provincial Penghu Hospital: W. P. Wu, T. Y. Ou. Sanchi Health Center, Taipei County: C. G. Lin. Provincial Chutung Hospital: K. C. Shih. Provincial Potzu Hospital: W. S. Chung, C. Li. Kaohsu Health Center, Pingtung County: C. C. Chen. Paihsa Health Center, Penghu County: W. C. How.Acknowledgment:We thank Yun-Fan Liaw, MD, of the Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital and University (Taipei, Taiwan) for his very helpful comments and suggestions.REFERENCESWMLeeHepatitis B virus infection.N Engl J Med1997337173317459392700CJChenLYWangMWYuEpidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in the Asia-Pacific region.J Gastroenterol Hepatol200015(suppl)E3E610921373RPBeasleyHepatitis B virus: the major etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer198861194219562834034BJMcMahonHepatocellular carcinoma and viral hepatitis.In: Wilson RA, ed. Viral Hepatitis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention.New York, NY: Marcel Deckker; 1997:315-330CJChenDSChenInteraction of hepatitis B virus, chemical carcinogen, and genetic susceptibility: multistage hepatocarcinogenesis with multifactorial etiology.Hepatology2002361046104912395312CJChenMWYuYFLiawEpidemiological characteristics and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Gastroenterol Hepatol199712S294S3089407350HIYangSNLuYFLiawHepatitis B e antigen and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.N Engl J Med200234716817412124405SLYouHIYangCJChenSeropositivity of hepatitis B e antigen and hepatocellular carcinoma.Ann Med20043621522415181977CJChenHIYangSLYouHepatitis B e antigen and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma [reply].N Engl J Med2002347172212444194AGeierCGDietrichCGartungAntiviral therapy in HBe-Ag-positive hepatitis B with normal aminotransferase levels.Hepatology20033771271312601370YFLiawNLeungRGuanGKLauIMericanAsian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: an update.J Gastroenterol Hepatol20031823924512603522ASLokBJMcMahonChronic hepatitis B.Hepatology2001341225124111732013ASFLokCGDietrichCGartungAntiviral therapy in HBe-Ag-positive hepatitis B with normal aminotransferase levels [reply].Hepatology20033771312601370HMommeja-MarinEMondouMRBlumFRousseauSerum HBV DNA as a marker of efficacy during therapy for chronic HBV infection: analysis and review of the literature.Hepatology2003371309131912774009AAlbertiCan serum HBV-DNA be used as a primary end point to assess efficacy of new treatments for chronic hepatitis B?Hepatology200338182012829981EPenaVKRohatgiSmall sample and efficiency results for the Nelson-Aalen estimator.J Stat Plann Inference199337192202NBreslowJCrowleyA large sample study of the life table and product limit estimates under random censorship.Ann Stat19742437453OAalenNonparametric inference for a family of counting processes.Ann Stat19786701726MHChangHYHsuHCHsuYHNiJSChenDSChenThe significance of spontaneous hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in childhood: with special emphasis on the clearance of hepatitis B e antigen before 3 years of age.Hepatology199522138713927590652CJChuMHussainASLokQuantitative serum HBV DNA levels during different stages of chronic hepatitis B infection.Hepatology2002361408141512447866PILeeMHChangCYLeeChanges of serum hepatitis B virus DNA and aminotransferase levels during the course of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in children.Hepatology1990126576602210669MWYuSHYehPJChenHepatitis B virus genotype and DNA level and hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study in men.J Natl Cancer Inst20059726527215713961 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Across a Biological Gradient of Serum Hepatitis B Virus DNA Level

Download PDF
9 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/risk-of-hepatocellular-carcinoma-across-a-biological-gradient-of-serum-FXhYZ3elmB

References (22)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.295.1.65
pmid
16391218
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ContextSerum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level is a marker of viral replication and efficacy of antiviral treatment in individuals with chronic hepatitis B.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between serum HBV DNA level and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective cohort study of 3653 participants (aged 30-65 years), who were seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen and seronegative for antibodies against the hepatitis C virus, recruited to a community-based cancer screening program in Taiwan between 1991 and 1992.Main Outcome MeasureIncidence of hepatocellular carcinoma during follow-up examination and by data linkage with the national cancer registry and the death certification systems.ResultsThere were 164 incident cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and 346 deaths during a mean follow-up of 11.4 years and 41 779 person-years of follow-up. The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma increased with serum HBV DNA level at study entry in a dose-response relationship ranging from 108 per 100 000 person-years for an HBV DNA level of less than 300 copies/mL to 1152 per 100 000 person-years for an HBV DNA level of 1 million copies/mL or greater. The corresponding cumulative incidence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma were 1.3% and 14.9%, respectively. The biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma by serum HBV DNA levels remained significant (P<.001) after adjustment for sex, age, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, serostatus for the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), serum alanine aminotransferase level, and liver cirrhosis at study entry. The dose-response relationship was most prominent for participants who were seronegative for HBeAg with normal serum alanine aminotransferase levels and no liver cirrhosis at study entry. Participants with persistent elevation of serum HBV DNA level during follow-up had the highest hepatocellular carcinoma risk.ConclusionElevated serum HBV DNA level (≥10 000 copies/mL) is a strong risk predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma independent of HBeAg, serum alanine aminotransferase level, and liver cirrhosis.More than 350 million persons in the world are infected with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV).It is particularly endemic in Taiwan, where the infection is usually acquired perinatally or in early childhood.Individuals with chronic hepatitis B infection are at an increased risk of developing liver cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma; 15% to 40% of these individuals will develop these serious sequelae during their lifetime.Hepatitis B virus is not directly cytopathic, and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in individuals with chronic hepatitis B is a multistage, multifactorial process including the interaction between host and environmental factors.Risk factors for chronic HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma include sex, age, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, chemical carcinogens, hormonal factors, and genetic susceptibility.Seropositivity for the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is one of the most important risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma.The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with seropositivity for HBsAg ranges from 5-fold to 98-fold with a population-attributable risk of 8% to 94%.In our previous study, seropositivity for the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) was associated with an increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of developing hepatocellular carcinoma was 9.6 for individuals seropositive for HBsAg and 60.2 for those seropositive for both HBsAg and HBeAg compared with those seronegative for both HBsAg and HBeAg. The increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk in individuals seropositive for HBeAg remained significant regardless of serum level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and status of liver cirrhosis.Highly sensitive testing methods based on polymerase chain reaction have become available for measuring serum level of HBV DNA. In current clinical practice guidelines,serum HBV DNA level is used as a criterion for antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Effective suppression of serum HBV DNA is a marker of efficacy for antiviral therapy.Its implementation as the primary surrogate end point instead of liver histology in assessment of new antiviral therapies remains to be validated.There are no long-term follow-up data on the relationship between serum HBV DNA level and risk of liver complications. In a small nested case-control analysis,we reported a significant association between serum HBV DNA level at study entry and hepatocellular carcinoma risk among individuals seronegative for HBeAg. However, there were only a small number of hepatocellular carcinoma cases and controls included in this study. Neither hepatocellular carcinoma incidence nor change in serum HBV DNA level over time was studied.In this population-based, long-term prospective study, we followed up a total of 3653 individuals who were seropositive for HBsAg and seronegative for antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) at study entry. The goals of this study were to assess the biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by (1) serum HBV DNA levels at study entry and adjusted for other risk factors including age, sex, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated serum ALT level, and presence of liver cirrhosis at study entry; and (2) persistent elevation of serum HBV DNA level at both study entry and follow-up examinations.METHODSCohort Recruitment and Follow-upFigure 1shows the flow of participants through the Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/Cancer-Hepatitis B Virus (REVEAL-HBV) study. A total of 89 293 individuals aged 30 to 65 years, who were living in 7 townships in Taiwan, were invited to participate in the study. From 1991 to 1992, 23 820 individuals agreed to participate and provided written informed consent for interview, health examination, blood collection for serological and biochemical assays, and follow-up of health status through health examination, medical record review, and linkage with national health profiles on the national cancer registry and death certification systems. The health examination at study entry included abdominal ultrasonography and serological tests for HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HCV, and serum levels of ALT and α-fetoprotein. A total of 4155 participants who were seropositive for HBsAg and free of hepatocellular carcinoma at study entry examination were followed up with abdominal ultrasonography and serological tests until June 30, 2004. Serum samples that had been collected and frozen at study entry were adequate for HBV DNA testing in 3851 participants. Among them, 3653 were seronegative for anti-HCV and were included in this study. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the College of Public Health, National Taiwan University in Taipei.Figure 1.Flow of Study Participants in the REVEAL-HBV StudyAnti-HCV indicates antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV); HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; REVEAL-HBV, Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/Cancer-Hepatitis B Virus.Interview and Blood CollectionAll participants were interviewed in person using a structured questionnaire administered by well-trained public health nurses at recruitment. Information was collected on sociodemographic characteristics, dietary habits, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, medical and surgical history, and family history of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis. History of menarche, menopause, pregnancy, delivery, and use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy was also collected from female participants. Using standard sterile techniques, a 10-mL blood sample was collected at study entry and at follow-up examinations.Laboratory ExaminationsSerological testing was performed as follows: HBsAg and HBeAg by radioimmunoassay with commercial kits (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill); anti-HCV by enzyme immunoassay using second-generation commercial kits (Abbott Laboratories); ALT by serum chemistry autoanalyzer (Model 736, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using commercial reagents (Biomérieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France); and serum HBV DNA was measured by polymerase chain reaction using the Cobas Amplicor HBV monitor test kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind), an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for quantifying HBV DNA. It has a certified lower limit of detection of 300 copies/mL. At this level of HBV DNA, the test has a 98.1% positivity rate and a 100% clinical specificity rate. The manufacturer's procedures for sample preparation, storage, and testing were followed. Whole blood was collected with a vacuum blood collection tube without an anticoagulant, the serum was separated by centrifugation at room temperature and was stored in a sterile tube at −70°C. This procedure was accomplished within 6 hours of sample collection. Each sample run for HBV DNA included a replicate of the negative, low-positive, and high-positive controls, and each run was determined to be valid.To examine the impact of changing serum HBV DNA level on hepatocellular carcinoma risk, the subset of participants with a study entry serum level of HBV DNA of 10 000 copies/mL or greater was evaluated. The follow-up serum samples were collected either at the last follow-up examination or at the follow-up examination preceding the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Of the 1619 participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 10 000 copies/mL or greater at study entry, 1330 (82%) had adequate follow-up serum samples for testing.Ascertainment of Newly Developed Hepatocellular CarcinomaAll study participants were without hepatocellular carcinoma at study entry. Newly developed hepatocellular carcinoma cases were detected by follow-up health examination or by computerized data linkage with the profiles on the national cancer registry in Taiwan from January 1, 1991, through June 30, 2004. To ensure complete ascertainment, we also performed data linkage with the profiles on the national death certification system to identify cases not registered in the cancer registry system. The ascertainment of newly developed hepatocellular carcinoma was complete and accurate.In total, 164 incident hepatocellular carcinoma cases occurred during the follow-up period. Medical record verification of all hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses was based on the following criteria: a histopathological examination (66 cases); a positive lesion detected by at least 2 different imaging techniques (abdominal ultrasonography, angiogram, or computed tomography; 87 cases), or by 1 imaging technique and a serum α-fetoprotein level of 400 ng/mL or greater (35 cases). Several cases qualified based on more than 1 criterion.Statistical AnalysisThe person-years of follow-up for each participant were calculated from the date of recruitment to the date of the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, the date at death, or the last date of linked data available from the national cancer registry (June 30, 2004), whichever came first. Participants free of hepatocellular carcinoma at their death or at the end of follow-up were censored. Incidence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma were calculated by dividing the number of incident hepatocellular carcinoma cases by person-years of follow-up. Cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma by follow-up year was derived using the Nelson-Aalen method.STATA software version 7.0 (STATA Corp, College Station, Tex) was used for the statistical analyses.The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the associations between serum HBV DNA level and hepatocellular carcinoma risk adjusted for sex, age, HBeAg status, serum ALT level, liver cirrhosis status, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption. The adjusted HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived to assess the magnitude of the association between various predictors and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Statistical significance levels were determined by 2-tailed tests (P<.05). The dose-response relationship between serum HBV DNA level and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after adjustment for other risk factors was examined for statistical significance with a test for trend. The biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by serum HBV DNA level was further examined in stepwise subgroup analyses by sequentially removing participants seropositive for HBeAg, with an elevated serum ALT level, and with liver cirrhosis at study entry from the analysis.In the analysis of the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by the change of serum level of HBV DNA during follow-up, the HBV DNA levels at baseline and follow-up examinations were combined to categorize study participants. Adjusted HRs were then derived for each category. P<.05 was considered significant.RESULTSThe basic characteristics of the study cohort appear in Table 1. The majority were male (62%); older than 39 years (67%); never smoked (66%); never drank alcohol (87%); had a serum ALT level of less than 45 U/L (94%); were seronegative for HBeAg (85%); and did not have liver cirrhosis (98%). The frequency distribution of serum HBV DNA level at study entry of 3653 study participants appears in Table 2. There were 873 study participants (23.9%) with an undetectable HBV DNA level (<300 copies/mL), while 976 participants (26.7%) had a level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater. Participants seropositive for HBeAg had a significantly higher serum level of HBV DNA than participants who were seronegative for HBeAg (P<.001). Of 565 participants seropositive for HBeAg, 523 (92.6%) had an HBV DNA level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater. Of 3088 participants seronegative for HBeAg, 453 (14.7%) had a HBV DNA level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater.Table 1.Baseline Characteristics of the Study CohortNo. (%) of Participants (N = 3653)*SexFemale1393 (38)Male2260 (62)Age, y30-391216 (33)40-491014 (28)50-591058 (29)≥60365 (10)Cigarette smoking†No2416 (66)Yes1234 (34)Alcohol consumption‡No3195 (87)Yes451 (12)Hepatitis B e antigenSeronegative3088 (85)Seropositive565 (15)Level of ALT, U/L<453435 (94)≥45218 (6)Liver cirrhosis§No3584 (98)Yes69 (2)Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBV, hepatitis B virus.*Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding.†Data were not available for 3 participants.‡Data were not available for 7 participants.§Diagnosed with ultrasonography within 6 months of cohort entry.Table 2.Serum Level of HBV DNA and HBeAg Serostatus at Study Entry*HBeAg SerostatusTotal (N = 3653)Negative (n = 3088)Positive (n = 565)Level of HBV DNA, copies/mL<300 (Undetectable)865 (28.0)8 (1.4)873 (23.9)300-999372 (12.1)0372 (10.2)1000-9999773 (25.0)16 (2.8)789 (21.6)10000-99999625 (20.2)18 (3.2)643 (17.6)100000-999999298 (9.7)51 (9.0)349 (9.6)1 to 9.9 milllion96 (3.1)58 (10.3)154 (4.2)10 to 99.9 million42 (1.4)58 (10.3)100 (2.7)≥100 million17 (0.6)356 (63.0)373 (10.2)Abbreviations: HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus.*Values are expressed as number (percentage).Incidence RatesThere were 41 779 person-years of follow-up with an average follow-up period of 11.4 years (Table 3). Through follow-up health examination and data linkage with the national cancer registry and national death certification systems between January 1, 1991, and June 30, 2004, 164 new hepatocellular carcinoma cases and 346 deaths were identified. The incidence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma by serum HBV DNA level as well as other risk factors at study entry examination appear in Table 3. The incidence rates per 100 000 person-years increased from 108.3 for the undetectable HBV DNA level (<300 copies/mL) to 1152.0 for the HBV DNA level of 1 million copies/mL or greater in a dose-response relationship. The biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by serum level of HBV DNA at study entry examination was significant (P<.001). Compared with participants having serum HBV DNA levels of less than 300 copies/mL, the crude HR was 1.0 (95% CI, 0.5-2.2) for participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 300 to 9999 copies/mL; 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3-5.6), 10 000-99 999 copies/mL; 8.9 (95% CI, 4.6-17.5), 100 000 to 999 999 copies/mL; and 10.7 (95% CI, 5.7-20.1), 1 million copies/mL or greater. Sex, age, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated serum ALT level, and liver cirrhosis at study entry were also significantly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma development and were adjusted for in further multiple regression analyses.Table 3.Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Study EntryNo. (%) of Participants (N = 3653)Person-Years of Follow-upNo. of Hepatocellular Carcinoma CasesIncidence Rate Per 100000 Person-YearsCrude HR (95%CI)*PValueSexFemale1393 (38)16307291781.0Male2260 (62)254721355303.0 (2.0-4.5)<.001Age, y30-391216 (33)14393161111.040-491014 (28)11776473993.6 (2.0-6.4)<.00150-591058 (29)11837675665.1 (3.0-8.9)<.001≥60365 (10)3773349018.3 (4.6-15.0)<.001Cigarette smoking†No2416 (66)28037903211.0Yes1234 (34)13704715181.7 (1.2-2.3)<.001Alcohol consumption‡No3195 (87)367791213291.0Yes451 (12)4928428522.6 (1.8-3.7)<.001Hepatitis B e antigenSeronegative3088 (85)35584942641.0Seropositive565 (15)61957011304.3 (3.2-5.9)<.001Level of ALT, U/L<453435 (94)394691333371.0≥45218 (6)23103113424.1 (2.8-6.0)<.001Liver cirrhosis§No3584 (98)412701313171.0Yes69 (2)50933648221.8 (14.9-32.0)<.001Level of HBV DNA, copies/mL<300 (Undetectable)873 (24)10154111081.0300-99991161 (32)13518151111.0 (0.5-2.2).9610000-99999643 (18)7404222972.7 (1.3-5.6).006100000-999999349 (9)3845379628.9 (4.6-17.5)<.001≥1 million627 (17)685879115210.7 (5.7-20.1)<.001Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HR, hazard ratio.*Cox proportional hazard models were used.†Data were not available for 3 participants.‡Data were not available for 7 participants.§Diagnosed with ultrasonography within 6 months of study entry.Cumulative IncidenceThe cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma during the follow-up period by serum HBV DNA level at study entry examination appears in Figure 2. There was an increasing trend of cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence with increasing serum HBV DNA level at study entry examination for all participants. The cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence was further calculated in the stepwise analyses in which participants with seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated serum ALT level, and liver cirrhosis were removed sequentially. There was a dose-response relationship between cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and serum HBV DNA level for a subcohort of participants who were seronegative for HBeAg, had a normal ALT level, and did not have liver cirrhosis, which included most participants (80%) in this study.Figure 2.Cumulative Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Serum HBV DNA Level at Study EntryAll participants were seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and seronegative for antibodies against the hepatitis C virus. Asterisk indicates these participants were seronegative for the hepatitis B e antigen and had a normal level of serum alanine aminotransferase and did not have liver cirrhosis at study entry. HBV indicates hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.Table 4compares the cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence at the end of the 13th year of follow-up derived from the stepwise analyses. Approximately 15% of all participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 1 million copies/mL or greater at study entry developed hepatocellular carcinoma by the 13th year of follow-up compared with 1.3% of participants with undetectable levels of HBV DNA. The biological gradient of cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence by serum HBV DNA level remained prominent in all stepwise analyses. Among the 2925 participants seronegative for HBeAg with a normal ALT level and no liver cirrhosis, the cumulative hepatocellular carcinoma incidence was 13.5% for HBV DNA levels of 1 million copies/mL or greater and 0.7% for those with undetectable levels of HBV DNA.Table 4.Cumulative Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by HBV DNA Level at Study EntryCumulative Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (N = 3653)*Seronegative for Hepatitis B e Antigen, %Only (n = 3088)Normal ALT Level (n = 2966)Normal ALT Level and No Liver Cirrhosis (n = 2925)Level of HBV DNA, copies/mL<300 (Undetectable)1.301.200.980.74300-99991.371.211.250.8910000-999993.573.683.423.15100000-99999912.179.548.557.96≥1 million14.8917.8819.5113.50Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBV, hepatitis B virus.*At the end of the 13th year of follow-up.Dose-Response RelationshipSeropositivity for HBeAg, elevated level of serum ALT, and presence of liver cirrhosis at study entry were significantly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk (Table 3). After adjustment for sex, age, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption, the HR for seropositivity for HBeAg was 6.9 (95% CI, 4.9-9.5; P<.001); elevated level of serum ALT, 3.8 (95% CI, 2.5-5.7; P<.001); and liver cirrhosis, 14.0 (95% CI, 9.4-21.0; P<.001).Level of HBV DNA was significantly associated with seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated serum ALT level, and liver cirrhosis at study entry. The independent effects of serum HBV DNA level on hepatocellular carcinoma development after adjustment for other hepatocellular carcinoma risk factors also were analyzed. Compared with participants having serum HBV DNA levels of less than 300 copies/mL, the adjusted HR of developing hepatocellular carcinoma was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.5-2.3; P = .86) for participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 300 to 9999 copies/mL; 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1-4.9; P = .02), 10 000 to 99 999 copies/mL; 6.6 (95% CI, 3.3-13.1; P<.001), 100 000 to 999 999 copies/mL; and 6.1 (95% CI, 2.9-12.7; P<.001), 1 million copies/mL or greater (Table 5). The adjusted HR was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.6-4.2; P<.001) for seropositivity for HBeAg; 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-1.7; P = .64) for elevated serum ALT level; and 9.1 (95% CI, 5.9-13.9; P<.001) for liver cirrhosis. In addition, male sex, increasing age, and habitual alcohol consumption were significantly associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in this long-term follow-up study.Table 5.Regression Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With Hepatocellular CarcinomaAll Participants (N = 3653)Hepatitis B e Antigen SeronegativeOnly (n = 3088)Normal ALT Level (n = 2966)Normal ALT Level and No Liver Cirrhosis (n = 2925)Multivariable-Adjusted HR (95% CI)*PValueMultivariable-Adjusted HR (95% CI)*PValueMultivariable-Adjusted HR (95% CI)*PValueMultivariable-Adjusted HR (95% CI)*PValueSexMale2.1 (1.3-3.3).0012.0 (1.1-3.6).031.6 (0.8-2.9).161.5 (0.8-2.9).24Age in 1-y increment1.09 (1.07-1.11)<.0011.08 (1.06-1.11)<.0011.09 (1.06-1.12)<.0011.11 (1.07-1.14)<.001Cigarette smokingYes1.0 (0.7-1.4).840.9 (0.6-1.4).691.1 (0.7-1.8).761.3 (0.7-2.3).35Alcohol consumptionYes1.6 (1.1-2.4).0091.7 (1.0-2.8).051.8 (1.1-3.1).031.7 (0.9-3.1).08Hepatitis B e antigenSeropositive2.6 (1.6-4.2)<.001Level of ALT, U/L≥451.1 (0.7-1.7).640.8 (0.4-1.7).62Liver cirrhosis†Yes9.1 (5.9-13.9)<.0017.9 (4.5-13.9)<.00111.7 (6.6-20.6)<.001Level of HBV DNA, copies/mL‡<300 (Undetectable)1.0<.001§1.0<.001§1.0<.001§1.0<.001§300-99991.1 (0.5-2.3).861.0 (0.5-2.4).941.3 (0.5-3.2).551.4 (0.5-3.8).5610000-999992.3 (1.1-4.9).022.6 (1.2-5.6).012.7 (1.2-6.3).024.5 (1.8-11.4).001100000-9999996.6 (3.3-13.1)<.0016.1 (2.9-12.8)<.0017.2 (3.2-16.6)<.00111.3 (4.5-28.4)<.001≥1 million6.1 (2.9-12.7)<.00110.6 (4.9-22.8)<.00114.3 (6.2-32.8)<.00117.7 (6.8-46.3)<.001Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HR, hazard ratio.*Cox proportional hazard models were used.†Diagnosed with ultrasonography within 6 months of study entry.‡At study entry.§For trend.In the stepwise analyses removing participants with study entry status of seropositivity for HBeAg, elevated ALT level, and liver cirrhosis sequentially, the dose-response relationship (P<.001 for trend) between hepatocellular carcinoma risk and serum HBV DNA level at study entry became increasingly stronger (Table 5). Among the 2925 participants seronegative for HBeAg who had a normal ALT level and no liver cirrhosis and compared with participants with serum HBV DNA levels of less than 300 copies/mL, the adjusted HR for participants with serum HBV DNA levels of 300 to 9999 copies/mL was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.5-3.8; P = .56); 10 000-99 999 copies/mL, 4.5 (95% CI, 1.8-11.4; P = .001); 100 000-999 999 copies/mL, 11.3 (95% CI, 4.5-28.4; P<.001); and 1 million copies/mL or greater, 17.7 (95% CI, 6.8-46.3; P<.001).Multivariable-Adjusted HRsWe further examined the association between hepatocellular carcinoma risk and persistently elevated serum HBV DNA levels at study entry and follow-up examinations. For participants who had a serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL or greater at study entry, we retrieved their serum samples collected at the follow-up examination just preceding the hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses or at the last follow-up examination for participants who had not developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Follow-up serum samples were inadequate for 289 (18%) participants with a serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL or greater at study entry examination. The median time between the study entry and follow-up serum samples was approximately 10 years (Table 6).Table 6.Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Serum HBV DNA Levels at Study Entry and at Last Follow-upLevel of HBV DNA, copies/mLNo. of Participants (N = 3653)*No. of Hepatocellular Carcinoma CasesMedian Time Between the Baseline and Last Follow-up Examination, yAdjusted HR (95% CI)†At Study EntryAt Follow-upSex, Age, Cigarette Smoking, and Alcohol ConsumptionPlus Seropositivity for HBeAg, Liver Cirrhosis,and ALT Level&numsp;<10000Not tested2034261.01.010000-99999&numsp;<10000256610.71.6 (0.7-3.9)1.3 (0.5-3.1)10000-9999910000-9999916119.20.5 (0.1-3.6)0.4 (0.1-3.2)10000-99999≥10000011059.93.5 (1.4-9.2)2.9 (1.0-9.8)≥100000&numsp;<10000146811.13.8 (1.7-8.4)1.9 (0.8-4.4)≥10000010000-999991201010.57.3 (3.5-15.3)4.3 (2.0-9.3)≥100000≥100000537559.910.1 (6.3-16.2)5.3 (2.9-9.7)Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CI, confidence interval; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HR, hazard ratio.*There were 289 participants whose last follow-up serum samples were not available.†Cox proportional hazard model was used.Among those who had serum HBV DNA levels at study entry of 10 000-99 999 copies/mL, a statistically significant increase in hepatocellular carcinoma risk (adjusted HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-9.2; P = .01) was observed for a follow-up level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater after adjustment for sex, age, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption. Among those with serum HBV DNA levels at study entry of 100 000 copies/mL or greater, a significant biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by follow-up HBV DNA level was observed (P<.01). The results remained unchanged after additional adjustment was performed for study entry HBeAg serostatus, serum ALT level, and presence of liver cirrhosis.Changes in HBV DNA level may be due to HBeAg seroconversion, treatment effect, or fluctuations in viral HBV DNA between tests. Because HBeAg seroconversion is likely to have had the greatest impact on change in HBV DNA level in this cohort, this relationship was explored in additional analyses. Of the participants seropositive for HBeAg, approximately 42% were seronegative for HBeAg according to the last serum sample available for testing. Of those who were now seronegative for HBeAg, the HBV DNA level in a greater proportion (18.5% compared with 1.1% in the group remaining seropositive for HBeAg) went from 100 000 copies/mL or greater to less than 10 000 copies/mL. Of the group remaining seropositive for HBeAg, 95.2% (compared with 55.4% in the group now seronegative for HBeAg) had an HBV DNA level remaining at 100 000 copies/mL or greater.COMMENTIn Taiwan, HBV infection is mostly acquired perinatally. Many individuals infected with HBV are seropositive for HBeAg and have extremely high-level viremia, normal serum ALT levels, and minimal liver disease.These individuals are considered to be in their immune-tolerant phase. Some of them develop chronic hepatitis B with an elevated serum ALT level later in life.Because treatment for HBV was not reimbursed by the universal national health insurance in Taiwan until 2003, the participants in this study have not received any antiviral treatment with interferon alfa or nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. The cohort in this study therefore represents a natural history cohort. To ensure that participants received treatment that is the standard of care, individuals with abnormal α-fetoprotein, ALT, or ultrasound tests were informed in a letter of the results and instructed to see their physician for follow-up evaluation. Individuals were free to discontinue participation at anytime for any reason. Additionally, all participants with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma were referred to a medical center of their choice for further evaluation. Based on the availability of reimbursement for HBV therapy in October 2003, individuals meeting the established treatment guidelines were referred to the National Taiwan University Hospital for evaluation.There are few other examples of a population-based cohort with prospectively collected data on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma with detailed information on serostatus for HBeAg and serum levels of HBV DNA and ALT. To the best of our knowledge, this study is one of the largest and longest follow-up studies on the association between hepatocellular carcinoma risk and serum HBV DNA level at study entry and follow-up examinations.Consistent with the findings we previously reported,there were significant associations between increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk and seropositivity for HBeAg, elevation of serum ALT level, and ultrasonographically detected liver cirrhosis within 6 months of entry in this study. Hepatitis B e antigen is a biomarker for the active replication of HBV in chronic hepatitis B patients. In this study, using a highly sensitive testing method based on polymerase chain reaction with a detection limit of 300 copies/mL for serum HBV DNA level, most participants with seropositivity for HBeAg (92.6%) had a highly elevated serum HBV DNA level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater. However, most participants seronegative for HBeAg (72.0%) still had a detectable serum HBV DNA level.A significant biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by serum HBV DNA level from 300 copies/mL (undetectable) to 1 million copies/mL or greater was observed in this study. The hepatocellular carcinoma risk started to increase significantly at a serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL, which is lower than the level (100 000 copies/mL) suggested by current clinical practice guidelines for making management decisions in the care of chronic hepatitis B patients.In this study, the majority of individuals with chronic hepatitis B (80%) were seronegative for HBeAg and had a normal serum ALT level at study entry and did not develop liver cirrhosis within 6 months of study entry. In this study, we found that serum level of HBV DNA was a prominent risk predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma independent of HBeAg status, serum ALT level, and the presence of liver cirrhosis. We also observed a significant dose-response relationship between serum HBV DNA level and hepatocellular carcinoma risk (P<.001). This biological gradient of hepatocellular carcinoma risk by serum HBV DNA level remained significant in all stepwise analyses using the Cox proportional hazards models. The consistency of a dose-response relationship between serum HBV DNA level at study entry and hepatocellular carcinoma risk during follow-up suggests the importance of closer clinical monitoring and even antiviral treatment for those who have an elevated serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL or greater. The development of new antiviral agents capable of effectively lowering serum HBV DNA level regardless of HBeAg serostatus and serum ALT level may be important to lower the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients.Serum level of HBV DNA is a dynamic parameter in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The importance of persistently elevated serum HBV DNA levels has seldom been elucidated. In this study, we analyzed the serum level of HBV DNA at last follow-up examination among those who had a serum HBV DNA level of 10 000 copies/mL or greater at study entry examination. For this analysis we used data from participants with a baseline HBV DNA level of less than 10 000 copies/mL as the reference group and we did not retest their follow-up serum samples. Making these participants the reference group serves to bias the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with persistent elevation of HBV DNA toward the null. This represents a conservative decision because some of these participants may have had elevated HBV DNA at follow-up examination. Among those who had a serum HBV DNA level of 100 000 copies/mL or greater, a significant reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma risk was observed with a decreasing serum HBV DNA level at follow-up examination in a reverse dose-response relationship (P<.01). Because most clinical trials of antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B are limited by their short period of follow-up, virological, histological, and biochemical markers are used to assess the efficacy of the therapy.It has been argued that serum HBV DNA level is a useful tool for comparing the antiviral potency of different antiviral drugs and strategies,but it is not the primary surrogate for clinical end points such as liver cirrhosis, liver decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma.The findings of this study provide strong longitudinal evidence of an increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk associated with the persistent elevation of serum HBV DNA level. This suggests that effective control of HBV replication indicated by the decrease in serum HBV DNA level following antiviral therapy can be expected to lower the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the long run.Important consideration should be given to the impact of HBV genotype on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in this population. In Taiwan, the HBV genotypes B and C are the predominant genotypes, and genotype C has been shown to be associated with higher HBV DNA levels and a greater risk of hepatocellular carcinoma than genotype B.In unpublished data from our cohort, among participants with HBV DNA levels of 100 000 copies/mL or greater, the frequencies of genotypes B and C were 79.3% and 20.7% in participants who were seronegative for HBeAg and 41.7% and 58.3% in participants who were seropositive for HBeAg, respectively. Also, the rates of the precore stop codon (G1896A) mutation were 63.7% for those who were seronegative for HBeAg and 7.2% for those who were seropositive for HBeAg. The complete ascertainment of the different genotypes and mutation rates in this cohort as well as their impact on hepatocellular carcinoma risk is the subject of an ongoing study.CONCLUSIONSerum level of HBV DNA may be used as a major risk predictor for hepatocellular carcinoma, independent of HBeAg serostatus, serum ALT level, and the presence of liver cirrhosis. Monitoring the change in serum HBV DNA level is recommended for the management of chronic hepatitis B patients. Randomized controlled trials comparing different therapeutic strategies in patients with elevated serum HBV DNA level but a normal ALT level may further contribute to the development of appropriate treatment guidelines in these patients. These patients, especially those seronegative for HBeAg, account for an increasing majority of chronically infected individuals and are at an increased risk of future hepatocellular carcinoma.Corresponding Author:Chien-Jen Chen, ScD, National Taiwan University, Room 1547, No. 1, Jen-Ai Rd Sec. 1, Taipei 10018, Taiwan ([email protected]).Author Contributions:Dr Chen had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.Study concept and design: Chen, Yang, Su, Huang, Iloeje.Acquisition of data: Chen, Yang, Jen, You, Lu, Huang.Analysis and interpretation of data: Chen, Yang, Su, Iloeje.Drafting of the manuscript: Chen, Iloeje.Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Chen, Yang, Su, Jen, You, Lu, Huang, Iloeje.Statistical analysis: Yang, Su, Iloeje.Obtained funding: Chen, Su, Iloeje.Administrative, technical, or material support: Chen, Yang, Jen, You, Lu, Huang.Study supervision: Chen.Financial Disclosures:None reported.Funding/Support:Dr Chen received a grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb to conduct the laboratory tests for this study. This study also was supported by the Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Republic of China.Role of the Sponsor:Drs Iloeje and Su (employed by Bristol-Myers Squibb) were involved in the study design, development of the analysis plan, and interpretation of the data and writing of the manuscript. All data handling and statistical analyses were done by the staff at the National Taiwan University. At no time did the funding sources have access to the data.Other Members of the REVEAL-HBV Study Group:National Taiwan University Hospital: C. Y. Hsieh, H. S. Lee, P. M. Yang, C. H. Chen, J. D. Chen, S. P. Huang, C. F. Jan. National Taiwan University: T. H. H. Chen. National Defense Medical Center: C. A. Sun. Taipei City Psychiatric Center: M. H. Wu. Tzu Chi University: L. Y. Wang, S. Y. Chen. Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital: K. E. Chu. Huhsi Health Center, Penghu County: S. C. Ho, T. G. Lu. Provincial Penghu Hospital: W. P. Wu, T. Y. Ou. Sanchi Health Center, Taipei County: C. G. Lin. Provincial Chutung Hospital: K. C. Shih. Provincial Potzu Hospital: W. S. Chung, C. Li. Kaohsu Health Center, Pingtung County: C. C. Chen. Paihsa Health Center, Penghu County: W. C. How.Acknowledgment:We thank Yun-Fan Liaw, MD, of the Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital and University (Taipei, Taiwan) for his very helpful comments and suggestions.REFERENCESWMLeeHepatitis B virus infection.N Engl J Med1997337173317459392700CJChenLYWangMWYuEpidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection in the Asia-Pacific region.J Gastroenterol Hepatol200015(suppl)E3E610921373RPBeasleyHepatitis B virus: the major etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer198861194219562834034BJMcMahonHepatocellular carcinoma and viral hepatitis.In: Wilson RA, ed. Viral Hepatitis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention.New York, NY: Marcel Deckker; 1997:315-330CJChenDSChenInteraction of hepatitis B virus, chemical carcinogen, and genetic susceptibility: multistage hepatocarcinogenesis with multifactorial etiology.Hepatology2002361046104912395312CJChenMWYuYFLiawEpidemiological characteristics and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Gastroenterol Hepatol199712S294S3089407350HIYangSNLuYFLiawHepatitis B e antigen and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.N Engl J Med200234716817412124405SLYouHIYangCJChenSeropositivity of hepatitis B e antigen and hepatocellular carcinoma.Ann Med20043621522415181977CJChenHIYangSLYouHepatitis B e antigen and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma [reply].N Engl J Med2002347172212444194AGeierCGDietrichCGartungAntiviral therapy in HBe-Ag-positive hepatitis B with normal aminotransferase levels.Hepatology20033771271312601370YFLiawNLeungRGuanGKLauIMericanAsian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: an update.J Gastroenterol Hepatol20031823924512603522ASLokBJMcMahonChronic hepatitis B.Hepatology2001341225124111732013ASFLokCGDietrichCGartungAntiviral therapy in HBe-Ag-positive hepatitis B with normal aminotransferase levels [reply].Hepatology20033771312601370HMommeja-MarinEMondouMRBlumFRousseauSerum HBV DNA as a marker of efficacy during therapy for chronic HBV infection: analysis and review of the literature.Hepatology2003371309131912774009AAlbertiCan serum HBV-DNA be used as a primary end point to assess efficacy of new treatments for chronic hepatitis B?Hepatology200338182012829981EPenaVKRohatgiSmall sample and efficiency results for the Nelson-Aalen estimator.J Stat Plann Inference199337192202NBreslowJCrowleyA large sample study of the life table and product limit estimates under random censorship.Ann Stat19742437453OAalenNonparametric inference for a family of counting processes.Ann Stat19786701726MHChangHYHsuHCHsuYHNiJSChenDSChenThe significance of spontaneous hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in childhood: with special emphasis on the clearance of hepatitis B e antigen before 3 years of age.Hepatology199522138713927590652CJChuMHussainASLokQuantitative serum HBV DNA levels during different stages of chronic hepatitis B infection.Hepatology2002361408141512447866PILeeMHChangCYLeeChanges of serum hepatitis B virus DNA and aminotransferase levels during the course of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in children.Hepatology1990126576602210669MWYuSHYehPJChenHepatitis B virus genotype and DNA level and hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study in men.J Natl Cancer Inst20059726527215713961

Journal

JAMA – American Medical Association

Published: Jan 4, 2006

There are no references for this article.