Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Prospective Evaluation of Vacuum Pleural Drainage After Thoracotomy in Patients With Esophageal Carcinoma

Prospective Evaluation of Vacuum Pleural Drainage After Thoracotomy in Patients With Esophageal... Abstract Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vacuum pleural drainage systems in selected patients. Design: Prospective nonrandomized study. Setting: Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery at a tertiary care center. Patients and Intervention: Between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1995, 32 patients underwent a right-sided posterolateral thoracotomy for the resection of esophageal carcinoma. A vacuum drain was employed in 21 patients (group 1) and an underwater drain in 11 patients (group 2). The selection of patients for vacuum drainage was based on minimal pleural adhesions and technical ease of the operation. Main Outcome Measure: Data on drainage efficiency, total drainage output and duration of the drain being left in situ, and postoperative pulmonary complications were analyzed. Results: The median total drainage outputs were 1280 mL and 1230 mL (P=.92, Mann-Whitney U test) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the median duration of chest drains being left in situ was 7 days and 6 days (P=.11, Mann-Whitney U test) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 5 patients (24%) enrolled in group 1 and 5 patients (45%) enrolled in group 2 (P=.09, Fisher exact test). No hospital mortality was reported during the study. Conclusion: The vacuum drain has proved to be as safe and efficient as the traditional underwater drain, imposing less discomfort and allowing early mobilization. The vacuum drain is, therefore, recommended in selected patients undergoing thoracotomy for esophageal resection.Arch Surg. 1997;132:749-752 References 1. O'Connor TW, Hugh TB. Abdominal drainage: a clinical review . Aust N Z J Surg . 1979;49:253-260.Crossref 2. Seely MF, Hyde WA, Irving M. A safe and effective disposable low pressure suction drain . Br J Surg . 1979;66:657-619.Crossref 3. Campbell P, Neil T, Wake PN. Homer's syndrome caused by an intercostal chest drain . Thorax . 1989;44:305-306.Crossref 4. Milsom I, Gustafsson A. An evaluation of a postoperative vacuum drainage system . Curr Med Res Opin . 1979;6:160-164.Crossref 5. Raves JJ, Slifkin M, Diamond DL. A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage . Am J Surg . 1984;148:618-620.Crossref 6. Riebman JB, Olivencia Yurvati AH, Laub GW. Improved technique for pleural drain insertion during cardiovascular surgery . J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) . 1994;35: 503-505. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Surgery American Medical Association

Prospective Evaluation of Vacuum Pleural Drainage After Thoracotomy in Patients With Esophageal Carcinoma

Archives of Surgery , Volume 132 (7) – Jul 1, 1997

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/prospective-evaluation-of-vacuum-pleural-drainage-after-thoracotomy-in-kxL5kRT9j0
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0004-0010
eISSN
1538-3644
DOI
10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310063012
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vacuum pleural drainage systems in selected patients. Design: Prospective nonrandomized study. Setting: Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery at a tertiary care center. Patients and Intervention: Between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1995, 32 patients underwent a right-sided posterolateral thoracotomy for the resection of esophageal carcinoma. A vacuum drain was employed in 21 patients (group 1) and an underwater drain in 11 patients (group 2). The selection of patients for vacuum drainage was based on minimal pleural adhesions and technical ease of the operation. Main Outcome Measure: Data on drainage efficiency, total drainage output and duration of the drain being left in situ, and postoperative pulmonary complications were analyzed. Results: The median total drainage outputs were 1280 mL and 1230 mL (P=.92, Mann-Whitney U test) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the median duration of chest drains being left in situ was 7 days and 6 days (P=.11, Mann-Whitney U test) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 5 patients (24%) enrolled in group 1 and 5 patients (45%) enrolled in group 2 (P=.09, Fisher exact test). No hospital mortality was reported during the study. Conclusion: The vacuum drain has proved to be as safe and efficient as the traditional underwater drain, imposing less discomfort and allowing early mobilization. The vacuum drain is, therefore, recommended in selected patients undergoing thoracotomy for esophageal resection.Arch Surg. 1997;132:749-752 References 1. O'Connor TW, Hugh TB. Abdominal drainage: a clinical review . Aust N Z J Surg . 1979;49:253-260.Crossref 2. Seely MF, Hyde WA, Irving M. A safe and effective disposable low pressure suction drain . Br J Surg . 1979;66:657-619.Crossref 3. Campbell P, Neil T, Wake PN. Homer's syndrome caused by an intercostal chest drain . Thorax . 1989;44:305-306.Crossref 4. Milsom I, Gustafsson A. An evaluation of a postoperative vacuum drainage system . Curr Med Res Opin . 1979;6:160-164.Crossref 5. Raves JJ, Slifkin M, Diamond DL. A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage . Am J Surg . 1984;148:618-620.Crossref 6. Riebman JB, Olivencia Yurvati AH, Laub GW. Improved technique for pleural drain insertion during cardiovascular surgery . J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) . 1994;35: 503-505.

Journal

Archives of SurgeryAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jul 1, 1997

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month