Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

PROceeding With the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

PROceeding With the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) Version of the Common Terminology Criteria... Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the CTCAE Original Investigation Research 21. Gundy CM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, et al. significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin 28. Nunnally JC, Berstein IH. Psychometric Theory. Comparing higher order models for the EORTC Proc. 2002;77(4):371-383. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(9):1607-1617. 25. Mendoza TR, Bennett AV, Mitchell SA, et al. 29. Jonckheere AR. A distribution-free k-sample 22. Kieffer JM, Giesinger JM, Fayers P, et al. Impact of recall period on the accuracy of selected test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika. 1954; Replication and relative validity of the mental and items from the US National Cancer Institute’s 41:133-145. physical higher order model of the EORTC Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the 30. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure QLQ-C30. Paper presented at: International Society Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika. 1988; for Quality of Life Research 21st Annual Conference; (PRO-CTCAE). Poster presented at: International 75:800-802. October 15-18, 2014; Berlin, Germany. Society for Quality of Life Research 21st Annual 31. Kirsch M, Mitchell SA, Dobbels F, et al. Linguistic Conference; October 15-18, 2014; Berlin, Germany. 23. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Oncology American Medical Association

PROceeding With the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

JAMA Oncology , Volume 1 (8) – Nov 1, 2015

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/proceeding-with-the-patient-reported-outcomes-pros-version-of-the-ux2q3P0gN9

References (13)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
2374-2437
eISSN
2374-2445
DOI
10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2689
pmid
26270250
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the CTCAE Original Investigation Research 21. Gundy CM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, et al. significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin 28. Nunnally JC, Berstein IH. Psychometric Theory. Comparing higher order models for the EORTC Proc. 2002;77(4):371-383. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(9):1607-1617. 25. Mendoza TR, Bennett AV, Mitchell SA, et al. 29. Jonckheere AR. A distribution-free k-sample 22. Kieffer JM, Giesinger JM, Fayers P, et al. Impact of recall period on the accuracy of selected test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika. 1954; Replication and relative validity of the mental and items from the US National Cancer Institute’s 41:133-145. physical higher order model of the EORTC Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the 30. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure QLQ-C30. Paper presented at: International Society Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika. 1988; for Quality of Life Research 21st Annual Conference; (PRO-CTCAE). Poster presented at: International 75:800-802. October 15-18, 2014; Berlin, Germany. Society for Quality of Life Research 21st Annual 31. Kirsch M, Mitchell SA, Dobbels F, et al. Linguistic Conference; October 15-18, 2014; Berlin, Germany. 23. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J.

Journal

JAMA OncologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Nov 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.