Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Osteoporosis Screening—2 Steps May Be Too Much for Women Younger Than 65 Years

Osteoporosis Screening—2 Steps May Be Too Much for Women Younger Than 65 Years Opinion EDITORIAL Osteoporosis Screening—2 Steps May Be Too Much for Women Younger Than 65 Years Margaret L. Gourlay, MD, MPH The 2018 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) osteo- The NNS estimates are not available for a 2-step screening procedure, but they would be higher because the FRAX fracture porosis screening statement includes separate B recommen- dations (moderate certainty of moderate net benefit) for bone risk assessment tool most often proposed for prescreening density screening in women performs only modestly better than chance to identify post- 65 years or older and in post- menopausal women aged 50 to 64 years with femoral neck menopausal women younger osteoporosis. Also, a prescreening step does not ensure selec- Related articles at jama.com than 65 years who are at in- tionofapatientpopulationmorelikelytobenefitfromtreatment. creased risk of osteoporosis, For example, a 2001 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that as determined by a formal clinical risk assessment tool. The B risedronate significantly reduced the risk of hip fracture among recommendation for routine osteoporosis screening in all women aged 80 years or older with confirmed osteoporosis, but women 65 years or older has been an enduring and evidence- not among women aged 70 to 79 years selected primarily based http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Internal Medicine American Medical Association

Osteoporosis Screening—2 Steps May Be Too Much for Women Younger Than 65 Years

JAMA Internal Medicine , Volume 178 (9) – Sep 26, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/osteoporosis-screening-2-steps-may-be-too-much-for-women-younger-than-f20utf3Xob
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
2168-6106
eISSN
2168-6114
DOI
10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2776
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Opinion EDITORIAL Osteoporosis Screening—2 Steps May Be Too Much for Women Younger Than 65 Years Margaret L. Gourlay, MD, MPH The 2018 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) osteo- The NNS estimates are not available for a 2-step screening procedure, but they would be higher because the FRAX fracture porosis screening statement includes separate B recommen- dations (moderate certainty of moderate net benefit) for bone risk assessment tool most often proposed for prescreening density screening in women performs only modestly better than chance to identify post- 65 years or older and in post- menopausal women aged 50 to 64 years with femoral neck menopausal women younger osteoporosis. Also, a prescreening step does not ensure selec- Related articles at jama.com than 65 years who are at in- tionofapatientpopulationmorelikelytobenefitfromtreatment. creased risk of osteoporosis, For example, a 2001 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that as determined by a formal clinical risk assessment tool. The B risedronate significantly reduced the risk of hip fracture among recommendation for routine osteoporosis screening in all women aged 80 years or older with confirmed osteoporosis, but women 65 years or older has been an enduring and evidence- not among women aged 70 to 79 years selected primarily based

Journal

JAMA Internal MedicineAmerican Medical Association

Published: Sep 26, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$499/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month