Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Miscellanea Medica

Miscellanea Medica for said. She also out that it incor¬ search. are to be in Center, Minneapolis, Minn, example, pointed They expected gen¬ described the as Bi¬ a of checks and eral with the FDA's. report "very good." porates systems balances, agreement ros was one of the leaders in the in that difficulties and concerns raised The intention is to deal with an in¬ drafting by coalition's between and the consensus statement. one IRB in a the NIH particular approving pro¬ consistency The addresses of the tocol shared with other "I think FDA in the the are IRBs. proposal regulations regarding many of bal¬ this will issues that have arisen in terms make the research more conduct of clinical research. help Currently, ethical One the that were consistent across the IRB the FDA focuses on the of ancing concepts country. expectation laid the Belmont Biros decide in the whereas the out in or not same NIH Report, benefit, regulations may may way as said. The Belmont was devel¬ but at least it will understand focus on the of minimal risk. Report another, concept the Commission for the Pro¬ what the were." This leaves researchers concerns oped by inconsistency tection of Human http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

Miscellanea Medica

JAMA , Volume 274 (15) – Oct 18, 1995

Miscellanea Medica

Abstract

for said. She also out that it incor¬ search. are to be in Center, Minneapolis, Minn, example, pointed They expected gen¬ described the as Bi¬ a of checks and eral with the FDA's. report "very good." porates systems balances, agreement ros was one of the leaders in the in that difficulties and concerns raised The intention is to deal with an in¬ drafting by coalition's between and the consensus statement. one IRB in a the NIH particular approving pro¬...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/miscellanea-medica-eF4oS73r2A

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1995.03530150011005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

for said. She also out that it incor¬ search. are to be in Center, Minneapolis, Minn, example, pointed They expected gen¬ described the as Bi¬ a of checks and eral with the FDA's. report "very good." porates systems balances, agreement ros was one of the leaders in the in that difficulties and concerns raised The intention is to deal with an in¬ drafting by coalition's between and the consensus statement. one IRB in a the NIH particular approving pro¬ consistency The addresses of the tocol shared with other "I think FDA in the the are IRBs. proposal regulations regarding many of bal¬ this will issues that have arisen in terms make the research more conduct of clinical research. help Currently, ethical One the that were consistent across the IRB the FDA focuses on the of ancing concepts country. expectation laid the Belmont Biros decide in the whereas the out in or not same NIH Report, benefit, regulations may may way as said. The Belmont was devel¬ but at least it will understand focus on the of minimal risk. Report another, concept the Commission for the Pro¬ what the were." This leaves researchers concerns oped by inconsistency tection of Human

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Oct 18, 1995

There are no references for this article.