Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Abstract In evaluating a new procedure such as needle biopsy of the kidney, it is important to know (1) its ease of performance, (2) its morbidity and mortality, and (3) its clinical usefulness. The first two points have been covered fairly well previously by us and by others.* In order to assess the last point we have chosen 100 successful renal biopsies and compared the clinical and pathological impressions. These 100 biopsies are taken from a total of 169 biopsy attempts, of which 131 yielded renal tissue. In 31 patients, however, the results were discarded from the study because the biopsies were unsatisfactory or because they were repeat biopsies on the same patients. METHODS Kidney biopsy specimens were obtained by means of a Turkel needle, formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and whatever other stains were necessary.5 Such sections measured 5 to 20 mm. in References 1. References 1-9. 2. References 2 and 14.
A.M.A. Archives of Internal Medicine – American Medical Association
Published: Dec 1, 1955
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.