Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
When one examines the pharmacologic portions of the many ponderous volumes composing the index to the Surgeon-General's library, and those of the Index Medicus, by which the former has been succeeded, remembering that a very large part of pharmaceutic literature is not here represented, the conviction is forced upon him that our knowledge of the practical utility of medicinal plants is small beyond all reasonable comparison with the amount of time that has been bestowed upon their study. This fact is not difficult to explain, at least in part. It is largely due to the method, or rather want of method which has prevailed, by which partial investigations have been made by individuals without regard to their relation to the complementary parts, these being left undone, the part performed remaining unutilized and becoming finally buried and forgotten. This neglect has been made farther operative by the habit of investigators of
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Jul 18, 1896
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.