Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

INEXPERT REFRACTION

INEXPERT REFRACTION The eye is defined very simply as "the organ of vision" (Century Dictionary, p. 2103). A number of secondary definitions are given, merely amplifying or extending the first. Is it presumptuous to begin a paper to be presented before the most representative group of American ophthalmologists with a statement so axiomatic? If so, we crave forgiveness. Recalling our undergraduate years and those immediately following, when we were first putting to practical use the concepts of medicine and surgery acquired in the laboratories and clinics, that which preeminently claimed our interest and attention was the means of restoring the sick patient to health. We were aware that a malady might, through the creation of toxic products, seriously interfere with the normal activities of certain organs, e. g., the impaired function of the kidney in scarlet fever or the development of myocardial changes in the course of diphtheria. Therapeutic indications were clear; http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

INEXPERT REFRACTION

JAMA , Volume 99 (2) – Jul 9, 1932

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/inexpert-refraction-OVBq43qPJE

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1932 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1932.02740540009004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The eye is defined very simply as "the organ of vision" (Century Dictionary, p. 2103). A number of secondary definitions are given, merely amplifying or extending the first. Is it presumptuous to begin a paper to be presented before the most representative group of American ophthalmologists with a statement so axiomatic? If so, we crave forgiveness. Recalling our undergraduate years and those immediately following, when we were first putting to practical use the concepts of medicine and surgery acquired in the laboratories and clinics, that which preeminently claimed our interest and attention was the means of restoring the sick patient to health. We were aware that a malady might, through the creation of toxic products, seriously interfere with the normal activities of certain organs, e. g., the impaired function of the kidney in scarlet fever or the development of myocardial changes in the course of diphtheria. Therapeutic indications were clear;

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jul 9, 1932

There are no references for this article.