Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Incorrect Impressions Concerning Industry-Sponsored Research—Reply

Incorrect Impressions Concerning Industry-Sponsored Research—Reply Letters 1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: example, are not represented in the Diagnostic and Statistical 3 validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41(11):1284-1292. Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria. In evaluating the 2. Maj M. “Clinical judgment” and the DSM-5 diagnosis of major depression. desirability of screening for depression in primary care, it is World Psychiatry. 2013;12(2):89-91. tempting, but in our view a mistake, to reify the DSM criteria. 3. Kendler KS. The phenomology of major depression and the representativeness This line of reasoning risks losing sight of a deeper reality: the and nature of DSM criteria. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(8):771-780. criteria for major depression are not the thing itself, but rather 4. Huybrechts KF, Palmsten K, Mogun H, et al. National trends in an imperfect index of an underlying condition. A better means antidepressant medication treatment among publicly insured pregnant women. of assessing the desirability of depression screening is to focus Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(3):265-271. on evaluating the practical clinical consequences of screening 5. Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H, et al. Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network on patients who are screened. meta-analysis. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA Internal Medicine American Medical Association

Incorrect Impressions Concerning Industry-Sponsored Research—Reply

Nestle, Marion
JAMA Internal Medicine , Volume 177 (3) – Mar 1, 2017
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/incorrect-impressions-concerning-industry-sponsored-research-reply-LMBSG1Vi4d
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
2168-6106
eISSN
2168-6114
DOI
10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9477
pmid
28264124
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Letters 1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: example, are not represented in the Diagnostic and Statistical 3 validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41(11):1284-1292. Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria. In evaluating the 2. Maj M. “Clinical judgment” and the DSM-5 diagnosis of major depression. desirability of screening for depression in primary care, it is World Psychiatry. 2013;12(2):89-91. tempting, but in our view a mistake, to reify the DSM criteria. 3. Kendler KS. The phenomology of major depression and the representativeness This line of reasoning risks losing sight of a deeper reality: the and nature of DSM criteria. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(8):771-780. criteria for major depression are not the thing itself, but rather 4. Huybrechts KF, Palmsten K, Mogun H, et al. National trends in an imperfect index of an underlying condition. A better means antidepressant medication treatment among publicly insured pregnant women. of assessing the desirability of depression screening is to focus Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(3):265-271. on evaluating the practical clinical consequences of screening 5. Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H, et al. Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network on patients who are screened. meta-analysis.

Journal

JAMA Internal Medicine – American Medical Association

Published: Mar 1, 2017

References

  • Food industry funding of nutrition research: the relevance of history for current debates
    Nestle, M
  • Sugar industry and coronary heart disease research: a historical analysis of internal industry documents
    Kearns, CE; Schmidt, LA; Glantz, SA
  • Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles
    Lesser, LI; Ebbeling, CB; Goozner, M; Wypij, D; Ludwig, DS