Hofrat Riehl
Abstract
To the Editor:—
Your editorial on Gustav Riehl (200:790, 1967) was another of your laudable contributions to the history of medicine. Within it, however, lies a small misunderstanding, which may have occurred during a translation. The article stated that Riehl served a short internship in Bamberg. Undoubtedly this referred to his service as an "Aspirant" (1879-1880) in the clinic of Professor Bamberger. This would have been the equivalent of the...