Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Abstract The general feeling of pessimism concerning the results obtained by the surgical treatment of patients with glaucoma seems sufficient justification for this paper. Our experience, until three years ago, was in agreement with that recently reported by Parker and others and led to the trial of the various surgical procedures but without raising the general average of successful operations above that of other operators. In 1927, we started an investigation to determine which of the different operations for glaucoma gave the best results. The cases studied date back to 1911. It was found that the results were slightly in favor of trephining and were better during the earlier than during the later years of our practice, when greater experience should have resulted in better operations. We were at first unable to explain why in similar eyes and apparently following the same technic, one trephining should prove successful while another was
Archives of Ophthalmology – American Medical Association
Published: Mar 1, 1930
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.