Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Gastrointestinal 'Crosses': A New Shade From an Old Palette

Gastrointestinal 'Crosses': A New Shade From an Old Palette Abstract Background: We present our experience with an as yet undescribed type of intentionally ingested metallic foreign body that was specially designed to arrest in its passage and cause perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. The two halves of a standard paper clip are tied crosswise with a rubber band, forming an elastic "cross." With its branches squeezed to lie parallel, the cross is wrapped into a small strip of paper and ingested. After being released from its wrapper, the branches of the cross spring back to their original position and cause perforation of the bowel wall. Design: Case series. Setting: University hospital, Bulgaria. Patients: Five male prisoners from the same jail undergoing laparotomy for foreign body removal during 1 week in January 1994. Interventions: Laparotomy, removal of the foreign bodies through incisions of the bowel wall, immediate restoration of the gastrointestinal tract continuity, and peritoneal lavage and drainage. Outcome Measures: Morbidity and mortality. Results: Two of the patients were initially observed but subsequently underwent surgery for perforations of the gastrointestinal tract. Three of the patients underwent immediate operative treatment. There were 20 total crosses ingested; all foreign objects impacted and perforated the stomach (50%), first duodenal portion (25%), and fourth duodenal portion (20%). There was no morbidity or mortality among the five patients treated. Conclusions: Because ingested crosses that have been released from their wrappers never move distally, the only definitive solution is to operate early.(Arch Surg. 1996;131:166-169) References 1. Jundling G, Wiessner V, Gebhardt C, Zeitler E, Wünsch P-H. Enterocolische Fistel infolge Fremdkorperincorporation . Dtsch Med Wochenschr . 1994;119: 63-66.Crossref 2. Selivanov V, Sheldon GF, Cello JP, Crass RA. Management of foreign body Ingestion . Ann Surg . 1984;199:187-191.Crossref 3. Webb WA. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastro-intestinal tract . Gastroenterology . 1988;94:204-216. 4. Ohri SK, Hutton KAR, Walsh R, Desa LA, Wood CB. Foreign body perforation of the ileum . Br J Clin Pract . 1990;44:647-648. 5. Rocklin MS, Apelgren KN. Colonoscopic extraction of foreign bodies from above the rectum . Am Surg . 1989;55:119-123. 6. Paulson EK, Jaffe RB. Metallic foreign bodies in the stomach: fluoroscopic removal with a magnetic orogastric tube . Radiology . 1990;174:191-194.Crossref 7. Castiñeira M, Lopez M. Ingestion de cuerpos extraños en reclusos . Rev Esp Enferm Dig . 1994;85:254-256. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Surgery American Medical Association

Gastrointestinal 'Crosses': A New Shade From an Old Palette

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/gastrointestinal-crosses-a-new-shade-from-an-old-palette-cKN1hxiikB
Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0004-0010
eISSN
1538-3644
DOI
10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430140056015
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Background: We present our experience with an as yet undescribed type of intentionally ingested metallic foreign body that was specially designed to arrest in its passage and cause perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. The two halves of a standard paper clip are tied crosswise with a rubber band, forming an elastic "cross." With its branches squeezed to lie parallel, the cross is wrapped into a small strip of paper and ingested. After being released from its wrapper, the branches of the cross spring back to their original position and cause perforation of the bowel wall. Design: Case series. Setting: University hospital, Bulgaria. Patients: Five male prisoners from the same jail undergoing laparotomy for foreign body removal during 1 week in January 1994. Interventions: Laparotomy, removal of the foreign bodies through incisions of the bowel wall, immediate restoration of the gastrointestinal tract continuity, and peritoneal lavage and drainage. Outcome Measures: Morbidity and mortality. Results: Two of the patients were initially observed but subsequently underwent surgery for perforations of the gastrointestinal tract. Three of the patients underwent immediate operative treatment. There were 20 total crosses ingested; all foreign objects impacted and perforated the stomach (50%), first duodenal portion (25%), and fourth duodenal portion (20%). There was no morbidity or mortality among the five patients treated. Conclusions: Because ingested crosses that have been released from their wrappers never move distally, the only definitive solution is to operate early.(Arch Surg. 1996;131:166-169) References 1. Jundling G, Wiessner V, Gebhardt C, Zeitler E, Wünsch P-H. Enterocolische Fistel infolge Fremdkorperincorporation . Dtsch Med Wochenschr . 1994;119: 63-66.Crossref 2. Selivanov V, Sheldon GF, Cello JP, Crass RA. Management of foreign body Ingestion . Ann Surg . 1984;199:187-191.Crossref 3. Webb WA. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastro-intestinal tract . Gastroenterology . 1988;94:204-216. 4. Ohri SK, Hutton KAR, Walsh R, Desa LA, Wood CB. Foreign body perforation of the ileum . Br J Clin Pract . 1990;44:647-648. 5. Rocklin MS, Apelgren KN. Colonoscopic extraction of foreign bodies from above the rectum . Am Surg . 1989;55:119-123. 6. Paulson EK, Jaffe RB. Metallic foreign bodies in the stomach: fluoroscopic removal with a magnetic orogastric tube . Radiology . 1990;174:191-194.Crossref 7. Castiñeira M, Lopez M. Ingestion de cuerpos extraños en reclusos . Rev Esp Enferm Dig . 1994;85:254-256.

Journal

Archives of SurgeryAmerican Medical Association

Published: Feb 1, 1996

References